Nakhaee Majid, Khandehroo Masoud, Esmaeili Reza
Social Development and Health Promotion Research Center, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran.
Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Social Development and Health Promotion Research Center, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran.
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024 Jan 18;22(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12962-024-00514-7.
Human communities suffered a vast socioeconomic burden in dealing with the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) globally. Real-word data about these burdens can inform governments about evidence-based resource allocation and prioritization. The aim of this scoping review was to map the cost-of-illness (CoI) studies associated with COVID-19.
This scoping review was conducted from January 2019 to December 2021. We searched cost-of-illness papers published in English within Web of Sciences, PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Science Direct and ProQuest. For each eligible study, extracted data included country, publication year, study period, study design, epidemiological approach, costing method, cost type, cost identification, sensitivity analysis, estimated unit cost and national burden. All of the analyses were applied in Excel software.
2352 records were found after the search strategy application, finally 28 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Most of the studies were done in the United States, Turkey, and China. The prevalence-based approach was the most common in the studies, and most of studies also used Hospital Information System data (HIS). There were noticeable differences in the costing methods and the cost identification. The average cost of hospitalization per patient per day ranged from 101$ in Turkey to 2,364$ in the United States. Among the studies, 82.1% estimated particularly direct medical costs, 3.6% only indirect costs, and 14.3% both direct and indirect costs.
The economic burden of COVID-19 varies from country to country. The majority of CoI studies estimated direct medical costs associated with COVID-19 and there is a paucity of evidence for direct non-medical, indirect, and intangible costs, which we recommend for future studies. To create homogeneity in CoI studies, we suggest researchers follow a conceptual framework and critical appraisal checklist of cost-of-illness (CoI) studies.
在全球应对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的过程中,人类社会承受了巨大的社会经济负担。关于这些负担的真实数据可以为政府提供循证资源分配和优先排序的依据。本范围综述的目的是梳理与COVID-19相关的疾病成本(CoI)研究。
本范围综述于2019年1月至2021年12月进行。我们在科学网、PubMed、谷歌学术、Scopus、科学Direct和ProQuest中搜索以英文发表的疾病成本论文。对于每项符合条件的研究,提取的数据包括国家、发表年份、研究时期、研究设计、流行病学方法、成本核算方法、成本类型、成本识别、敏感性分析、估计单位成本和国家负担。所有分析均在Excel软件中进行。
应用检索策略后共找到2352条记录,最终28篇文章符合纳入标准并被纳入综述。大多数研究在美国、土耳其和中国进行。基于患病率的方法在研究中最为常见,大多数研究还使用了医院信息系统数据(HIS)。在成本核算方法和成本识别方面存在显著差异。每位患者每天的住院平均成本从土耳其的101美元到美国的2364美元不等。在这些研究中,82.1%特别估计了直接医疗成本,3.6%仅估计了间接成本,14.3%同时估计了直接和间接成本。
COVID-19的经济负担因国家而异。大多数CoI研究估计了与COVID-19相关的直接医疗成本,而对于直接非医疗、间接和无形成本的证据较少,我们建议在未来的研究中加以关注。为了使CoI研究具有同质性,我们建议研究人员遵循疾病成本(CoI)研究的概念框架和批判性评价清单。