• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“我能够挽回局面”:在经历了首次剖宫产中不人道的孕产护理后寻求剖宫产后阴道分娩。

"I was able to take it back": Seeking VBAC after experiencing dehumanizing maternity care in a primary cesarean.

作者信息

Ibrahim Bridget Basile, Cheyney Melissa, Vedam Saraswathi, Kennedy Holly Powell

机构信息

Yale University School of Nursing, 400 West Campus Drive, Orange, CT, 06477, United States.

Oregon State University, Waldo Hall 224, 2250 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR, 97331, United States.

出版信息

SSM Qual Res Health. 2023 Dec;4. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100339. Epub 2023 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100339
PMID:38239391
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10795544/
Abstract

In this article, we present findings from a qualitative narrative analysis that examined the pregnancy, primary cesarean, and subsequent birth experiences of women in the United States. Using a maximal variation sampling strategy, we recruited participants via social media and networking to participate in semistructured interviews. Twenty-five women from diverse backgrounds and geographic locations across the U.S. participated, eight self-identified as racialized and seventeen as non-Hispanic, White. Data were analyzed iteratively using Clandinin and Connelly's approach to Narrative Inquiry. Across their narratives, participants described their experiences of maternity care that were either generally negative (dehumanizing care) or positive (humanized care). They further described how their experiences of dehumanizing or humanized care impacted their decision-making for subsequent births, mental health, relationships with the healthcare system, early parenting birth satisfaction, and family planning. Findings suggest that regardless of ultimate mode of birth, what was most important to women was how they are treated by their maternity care team. We suggest practice changes that may improve the experience of maternity care for primary cesarean and subsequent births, especially among those made marginal by systems of oppression.

摘要

在本文中,我们展示了一项定性叙事分析的结果,该分析考察了美国女性的怀孕、初次剖宫产及后续分娩经历。我们采用最大差异抽样策略,通过社交媒体和社交网络招募参与者,以参与半结构化访谈。来自美国不同背景和地理位置的25名女性参与了研究,其中8人自我认定为有色人种,17人是非西班牙裔白人。我们使用克兰迪宁和康奈利的叙事探究方法对数据进行了反复分析。在她们的叙述中,参与者描述了她们接受的产科护理经历,这些经历要么总体上是负面的(非人性化护理),要么是正面的(人性化护理)。她们还进一步描述了非人性化或人性化护理经历如何影响她们对后续分娩的决策、心理健康、与医疗系统的关系、初为人母的分娩满意度以及计划生育。研究结果表明,无论最终的分娩方式如何,对女性来说最重要的是她们在产科护理团队那里得到怎样的对待。我们建议做出一些实践改变,以改善初次剖宫产及后续分娩的产科护理体验,尤其是在那些因压迫制度而处于边缘地位的人群中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40fe/10795544/1429ebec6a34/nihms-1952572-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40fe/10795544/1429ebec6a34/nihms-1952572-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40fe/10795544/1429ebec6a34/nihms-1952572-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
"I was able to take it back": Seeking VBAC after experiencing dehumanizing maternity care in a primary cesarean.“我能够挽回局面”:在经历了首次剖宫产中不人道的孕产护理后寻求剖宫产后阴道分娩。
SSM Qual Res Health. 2023 Dec;4. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100339. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
2
Racial Disparities in Respectful Maternity Care During Pregnancy and Birth After Cesarean in Rural United States.美国农村地区剖宫产术后妊娠和分娩期间尊重产妇护理的种族差异。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2023 Jan;52(1):36-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2022.10.001. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
3
Inequities in quality perinatal care in the United States during pregnancy and birth after cesarean.美国剖宫产术后妊娠和分娩期间围产期护理质量的不平等现象。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 22;17(9):e0274790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274790. eCollection 2022.
4
Demographic, Socioeconomic, Health Systems, and Geographic Factors Associated with Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: An Analysis of 2017 U.S. Birth Certificate Data.与剖宫产术后阴道分娩相关的人口统计学、社会经济学、卫生系统和地理因素:对 2017 年美国出生证明数据的分析。
Matern Child Health J. 2021 Jul;25(7):1069-1080. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-03066-3. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
5
A narrative analysis of women's experiences of planning a vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) in Australia using critical feminist theory.运用批判女性主义理论对澳大利亚妇女计划剖腹产(VBAC)后阴道分娩经历的叙述分析
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Apr 29;19(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2297-4.
6
Learning from women: Improving experiences of respectful maternity care during unplanned caesarean birth for women with diverse ethnicity and racial backgrounds.向女性学习:改善不同种族和族裔背景的女性在计划外剖宫产分娩期间获得尊重的孕产护理体验。
Women Birth. 2023 Feb;36(1):e125-e133. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2022.05.004. Epub 2022 May 21.
7
"I had to fight for my VBAC": A mixed methods exploration of women's experiences of pregnancy and vaginal birth after cesarean in the United States.“我必须争取 VBAC(阴道分娩):对美国妇女剖腹产产后阴道分娩经历的混合方法探索。”
Birth. 2021 Jun;48(2):164-177. doi: 10.1111/birt.12513. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
8
Women Construct Their Birth Narratives and Process Unplanned Cesarean Births Through Storytelling.女性通过讲故事来构建自己的分娩叙事,并处理意外的剖宫产。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2021 Jan;50(1):30-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2020.09.157. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
9
"": A Narrative Study on Women's Expectations and Experiences of Maternity Care in Bangladesh.《孟加拉国妇女对孕产妇护理的期望与经历的叙事研究》 (原文冒号前为空,推测标题应是这样,如有错误请指出)
J Patient Exp. 2023 Nov 19;10:23743735231215607. doi: 10.1177/23743735231215607. eCollection 2023.
10
The role of the respectful maternity care model in São Paulo, Brazil: A cross-sectional study.巴西圣保罗尊重产妇护理模式的作用:一项横断面研究。
Birth. 2019 Sep;46(3):509-516. doi: 10.1111/birt.12448.

引用本文的文献

1
The Social Context of Pregnancy, Respectful Maternity Care, Biomarkers of Weathering, and Postpartum Mental Health Inequities: A Scoping Review.怀孕的社会背景、尊重孕产妇护理、健康状况的生物标志物以及产后心理健康不平等:一项范围综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Apr 15;21(4):480. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21040480.

本文引用的文献

1
Obstetric experiences of young black mothers: An intersectional perspective.年轻黑人母亲的产科经历:一个交叉视角。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Jan;317:115604. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115604. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
2
Racism During Pregnancy and Birthing: Experiences from Asian and Pacific Islander, Black, Latina, and Middle Eastern Women.孕期和分娩期间的种族主义:亚裔和太平洋岛民、非裔、拉丁裔和中东女性的经历。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023 Dec;10(6):3007-3017. doi: 10.1007/s40615-022-01475-4. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
3
Inequities in quality perinatal care in the United States during pregnancy and birth after cesarean.
美国剖宫产术后妊娠和分娩期间围产期护理质量的不平等现象。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 22;17(9):e0274790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274790. eCollection 2022.
4
Learning from women: Improving experiences of respectful maternity care during unplanned caesarean birth for women with diverse ethnicity and racial backgrounds.向女性学习:改善不同种族和族裔背景的女性在计划外剖宫产分娩期间获得尊重的孕产护理体验。
Women Birth. 2023 Feb;36(1):e125-e133. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2022.05.004. Epub 2022 May 21.
5
Births: Final Data for 2020.出生人数:2020 年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2021 Feb;70(17):1-50.
6
From coercion to respectful care: women's interactions with health care providers when planning a VBAC.从强制到尊重的护理:妇女在计划 VBAC 时与医疗保健提供者的互动。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jan 27;22(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04407-6.
7
Examining the association between subjective childbirth experience and maternal mental health at six months postpartum.探讨主观分娩体验与产后 6 个月产妇心理健康之间的关联。
J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2023 Jul;41(3):275-288. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2021.1990233. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
8
Experiences of Quality Perinatal Care During the US COVID-19 Pandemic.美国 COVID-19 大流行期间的优质围产期护理体验。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2021 Sep;66(5):579-588. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13269. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
9
Perceived discrimination during the childbirth hospitalization and postpartum visit attendance and content: Evidence from the Listening to Mothers in California survey.产妇在分娩住院和产后访视期间感知到的歧视,以及其内容:来自加利福尼亚州倾听母亲调查的证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 23;16(6):e0253055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253055. eCollection 2021.
10
Person-centered maternity care and postnatal health: associations with maternal and newborn health outcomes.以人为主导的孕产护理与产后健康:与孕产妇和新生儿健康结局的关联
AJOG Glob Rep. 2021 Feb;1(1):100005. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2021.100005.