Stoll Sarah E M, Bauer Isabel, Hopfer Karen, Lamberty Judith, Lunz Verena, Guzmán Bausch Francesca, Höflacher Cosima, Kroliczak Gregory, Kalénine Solène, Randerath Jennifer
Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Lurija Institute for Rehabilitation Science and Health Research, Kliniken Schmieder, Allensbach, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 4;14:1270437. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1270437. eCollection 2023.
In the 21st century, digital devices have become integral to our daily lives. Still, practical assessments designed to evaluate an individual's digital tool competencies are absent. The present study introduces the "Digital Tools Test" ("DIGI"), specifically designed for the evaluation of one's proficiency in handling common applications and functions of smartphones and tablets. The DIGI assessment has been primarily tailored for prospective use among older adults and neurological patients with the latter frequently suffering from so-called apraxia, which potentially also affects the handling of digital tools. Similar to traditional tool use tests that assess tool-selection and tool-action processes, the DIGI assessment evaluates an individual's ability to select an appropriate application for a given task (e.g., creating a new contact), their capacity to navigate within the chosen application and their competence in executing precise and accurate movements, such as swiping.
We tested the implementation of the DIGI in a group of 16 healthy adults aged 18 to 28 years and 16 healthy adults aged 60 to 74 years. All participants were able to withstand the assessment and reported good acceptance.
The results revealed a significant performance disparity, with older adults displaying notably lower proficiency in the DIGI. The DIGI performance of older adults exhibited a correlation with their ability to employ a set of novel mechanical tools, but not with their ability to handle a set of familiar common tools. There was no such correlation for the younger group.
In conclusion, this study introduces an innovative assessment tool aimed at evaluating common digital tool competencies. Our preliminary results demonstrate good acceptance and reveal expected group differences. For current cohorts of older adults, the results seem to indicate that the ability to use novel tools may aid digital tool use. In the next step, the psychometric properties of the DIGI assessment should be evaluated in larger and more diverse samples. The advancement of digital tool competency assessments and rehabilitation strategies is essential when we aim at facilitating societal inclusion and participation for individuals in affected populations.
在21世纪,数字设备已成为我们日常生活中不可或缺的一部分。然而,目前仍缺乏旨在评估个人数字工具能力的实际测评。本研究推出了“数字工具测试”(“DIGI”),该测试专门设计用于评估个人操作智能手机和平板电脑常见应用程序及功能的熟练程度。DIGI评估主要是为老年人和神经疾病患者设计的,后者经常患有所谓的失用症,这可能也会影响数字工具的操作。与评估工具选择和工具操作过程的传统工具使用测试类似,DIGI评估会评估个人为给定任务选择合适应用程序的能力(例如创建新联系人)、在所选应用程序中导航的能力以及执行精确动作(如滑动)的能力。
我们在一组16名年龄在18至28岁的健康成年人以及16名年龄在60至74岁的健康成年人中测试了DIGI的实施情况。所有参与者都能完成评估,并表示接受度良好。
结果显示出显著的表现差异,老年人在DIGI测试中的熟练程度明显较低。老年人的DIGI表现与他们使用一套新型机械工具的能力相关,但与他们操作一套熟悉的常用工具的能力无关。年轻组则不存在这种相关性。
总之,本研究推出了一种旨在评估常见数字工具能力的创新评估工具。我们的初步结果显示出良好的接受度,并揭示了预期的组间差异。对于当前的老年人群体,结果似乎表明使用新型工具的能力可能有助于数字工具的使用。下一步,应在更大且更多样化的样本中评估DIGI评估的心理测量特性。当我们旨在促进受影响人群中的个体融入社会并参与社会活动时,数字工具能力评估和康复策略的发展至关重要。