Jabbar Huriya, Wilson Terri S
The University of Texas at Austin.
University of Colorado Boulder, United States.
Educ Policy Anal Arch. 2018 Jan 5;26. doi: 10.14507/epaa.26.3883. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
School choice has the potential to be a tool for desegregation, but research suggests that choice more often exacerbates segregation than remedies it. In the past several years, hundreds of 'intentionally diverse' charter schools have opened across the country, potentially countering the link between charter schools and segregation. Yet, these schools raise important questions about choice, segregation, and equity. For instance: how do leaders of diverse charter schools prioritize diversity in decisions about location, marketing, and recruitment? What are the implications of these diversity efforts for equity, especially within competitive and marketized educational contexts? We explore the concrete recruiting and marketing strategies schools used to build and retain their diverse communities, drawing on qualitative data from New Orleans, LA and Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN. We identify key strategies used by school leaders, but also note that many strategies were ad-hoc and experimental. Furthermore, we note that schools often did not articulate their goals for diversity, making them susceptible to external pressures that might refocus attention away from equity and diversity, or allow groups with more power to shape agendas within the school. Finally, we find that gentrification and widening economic inequities threatened schools' efforts to recruit and maintain a diverse student body. We discuss implications for leaders of diverse charter schools and other leaders seeking to diversify their student bodies, as well as policymakers and charter authorizers.
学校选择有可能成为一种消除种族隔离的工具,但研究表明,选择往往会加剧而不是补救种族隔离。在过去几年里,全国开设了数百所“有意追求多元化”的特许学校,这有可能打破特许学校与种族隔离之间的联系。然而,这些学校引发了关于选择、种族隔离和公平性的重要问题。例如:多元化特许学校的领导在选址、营销和招生决策中如何优先考虑多元化?这些多元化努力对公平性有何影响,尤其是在竞争激烈和市场化的教育环境中?我们利用来自路易斯安那州新奥尔良市和明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯-圣保罗市的定性数据,探讨学校用于建立和留住多元化社区的具体招生和营销策略。我们确定了学校领导使用的关键策略,但也指出许多策略是临时的和试验性的。此外,我们注意到学校往往没有阐明其多元化目标,这使得它们容易受到外部压力的影响,这些压力可能会将注意力从公平性和多元化上转移开,或者让更有权力的群体在学校内部制定议程。最后,我们发现中产阶级化和日益扩大的经济不平等威胁到学校招收和维持多元化学生群体的努力。我们讨论了对多元化特许学校的领导以及其他寻求使学生群体多样化的领导、政策制定者和特许学校授权机构的启示。