• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Editorial: Experts' opinions on aging and public health.

作者信息

Ory Marcia G, Smith Matthew Lee

机构信息

Center for Community Health and Aging, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.

School of Public Health Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 4;11:1322841. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1322841. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1322841
PMID:38239786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10794574/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Editorial: Experts' opinions on aging and public health.社论：专家对衰老与公共卫生的看法。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 4;11:1322841. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1322841. eCollection 2023.
2
The reliability of experts' opinions in constructing a composite environmental index: the case of ESI 2005.构建综合环境指数时专家意见的可靠性：以2005年环境可持续指数为例
J Environ Manage. 2009 Jun;90(8):2448-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.018. Epub 2009 Mar 14.
3
[The role of the Medical Scientific Council's Forensic Committee in the consent judgments regarding private insurance companies].
Orv Hetil. 2008 Aug 3;149(31):1457-62. doi: 10.1556/OH.2008.28390.
4
The Experts' Advice: Prevention and Responsibility in German Media and Scientific Discourses on Dementia.专家建议：德国媒体和科学界关于痴呆症的预防和责任论争
Qual Health Res. 2021 Sep;31(11):2005-2018. doi: 10.1177/10497323211014844. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
5
Medical Experts' Agreement on Risk Assessment Based on All Possible Combinations of the COVID-19 Predictors-A Novel Approach for Public Health Screening and Surveillance.医学专家基于 COVID-19 预测因素的所有可能组合达成的风险评估共识——一种用于公共卫生筛查和监测的新方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 10;19(24):16601. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416601.
6
Social media for health promotion in diabetes: study protocol for a participatory public health intervention design.社交媒体用于糖尿病健康促进：一项参与式公共卫生干预设计的研究方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 5;18(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3178-7.
7
Editorial: Experts' opinions in radiation and health: Emerging issues in the field.社论：辐射与健康领域专家观点：该领域新出现的问题
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 17;11:1168971. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1168971. eCollection 2023.
8
The European Union and Public Health Emergencies: Expert Opinions on the Management of the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Suggestions for Future Emergencies.欧盟与公共卫生紧急事件：应对 COVID-19 大流行第一波疫情的管理专家意见及对未来紧急事件的建议。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 20;9:698995. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.698995. eCollection 2021.
9
A comparative analysis of attitudes toward genome-edited food among Japanese public and scientific community.公众与科学界对基因编辑食品态度的比较分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0300107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300107. eCollection 2024.
10
Editorial: Women in Science: Aging and Public Health 2021.社论：2021年科学界的女性：衰老与公共卫生
Front Public Health. 2022 May 30;10:895113. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.895113. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Editorial: Healthy Aging and the Community Environment.社论：健康老龄化与社区环境
Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 15;9:737955. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.737955. eCollection 2021.
2
The Role of Health Technologies in Multicomponent Primary Care Interventions: Systematic Review.健康技术在多组分初级保健干预中的作用：系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 11;23(1):e20195. doi: 10.2196/20195.
3
RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review.RE-AIM规划与评估框架：历经20年回顾，适应新科学与实践
Front Public Health. 2019 Mar 29;7:64. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064. eCollection 2019.
4
Interdisciplinary team science and the public: Steps toward a participatory team science.跨学科团队科学与公众：迈向参与式团队科学的步骤。
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):549-562. doi: 10.1037/amp0000281.
5
Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review.孤独感和社会隔离作为死亡风险因素：一项荟萃分析综述。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Mar;10(2):227-37. doi: 10.1177/1745691614568352.