Suppr超能文献

跨学科团队科学与公众:迈向参与式团队科学的步骤。

Interdisciplinary team science and the public: Steps toward a participatory team science.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Division of Prevention and Community Research & The Consultation Center, Yale University School of Medicine.

Department of Psychological Science, Central Connecticut State University.

出版信息

Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):549-562. doi: 10.1037/amp0000281.

Abstract

Interdisciplinary team science involves research collaboration among investigators from different disciplines who work interdependently to share leadership and responsibility. Although over the past several decades there has been an increase in knowledge produced by science teams, the public has not been meaningfully engaged in this process. We argue that contemporary changes in how science is understood and practiced offer an opportunity to reconsider engaging the public as active participants on teams and coin the term participatory team science to describe public engagement in team science. We discuss how public engagement can enhance knowledge within the team to address complex problems and suggest a different organizing framework for team science that aligns better with how teams operate and with participatory approaches to research. We also summarize work on public engagement in science, describe opportunities for various types of engagement, and provide an example of participatory team science carried out across research phases. We conclude by discussing implications of participatory team science for psychology, including changing the default when assembling an interdisciplinary science team by identifying meaningful roles for public engagement through participatory team science. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

跨学科团队科学涉及来自不同学科的研究人员之间的合作研究,他们相互依存,共同领导和承担责任。尽管在过去几十年中,科学团队的知识产出有所增加,但公众并没有真正参与到这个过程中。我们认为,当前科学界对科学的理解和实践的变化为重新考虑让公众作为积极的参与者加入团队提供了机会,并将这一术语命名为“参与式团队科学”,以描述公众在团队科学中的参与。我们讨论了公众参与如何增强团队内部解决复杂问题的知识,并提出了一种不同的团队科学组织框架,使其更符合团队的运作方式和参与式研究方法。我们还总结了科学领域的公众参与工作,描述了各种类型的参与机会,并提供了一个跨研究阶段进行的参与式团队科学的例子。最后,我们讨论了参与式团队科学对心理学的影响,包括通过参与式团队科学确定公众参与的有意义角色,改变组建跨学科科学团队的默认方式。

相似文献

4
Team Science, Justice, and the Co-Production of Knowledge.团队科学、正义与知识的共同生产。
Am J Community Psychol. 2018 Sep;62(1-2):13-22. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12252. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
6
Fresh teams are associated with original and multidisciplinary research.新鲜的团队与原创和多学科研究有关。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Oct;5(10):1314-1322. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01084-x. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
8
The science of teamwork: Introduction to the special issue.团队科学:特刊介绍。
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):305-307. doi: 10.1037/amp0000337.
10
Building and maintaining an interdisciplinary research team.组建并维持一支跨学科研究团队。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1999 Apr-Jun;13 Suppl 1:S17-21. doi: 10.1097/00002093-199904001-00006.

引用本文的文献

6
Editorial: Experts' opinions on aging and public health.社论:专家对衰老与公共卫生的看法。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 4;11:1322841. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1322841. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

2
Team Science, Justice, and the Co-Production of Knowledge.团队科学、正义与知识的共同生产。
Am J Community Psychol. 2018 Sep;62(1-2):13-22. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12252. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
4
From patients to partners.从患者到伙伴。
Science. 2017 Oct 20;358(6361):414. doi: 10.1126/science.358.6361.414.
6
Generalizing about Public Health Interventions: A Mixed-Methods Approach to External Validity.推广公共卫生干预措施:外部有效性的混合方法研究。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2017 Mar 20;38:371-391. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044509. Epub 2017 Jan 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验