• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胆囊切除术后附带阑尾切除术对感染率影响的前瞻性分析。

Prospective analysis of the effect of incidental appendectomy on infection rate after cholecystectomy.

作者信息

Ikard R W

出版信息

South Med J. 1987 Mar;80(3):292-5. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198703000-00004.

DOI:10.1097/00007611-198703000-00004
PMID:3824009
Abstract

I prospectively studied 100 patients to see whether "incidental appendectomy" with cholecystectomy affects wound infection rate. Randomization resulted in groups similar in age, habitus, and sex. Forty-seven patients had appendectomy. The most frequent gallbladder disease was chronic calculous cholecystitis. Positive cultures were obtained from 11% of gallbladders. The mean age of patients with gallbladder bacteria was 14.5 years older than that of the series. True pathologic changes were seen in 6% of appendices. Average operative time was extended six minutes by appendectomy. Length of postoperative hospital stay was unchanged by the addition of appendectomy. There were no infections in the patients without appendectomy and one (2%) in the group with appendectomy. The total 1% infection rate is considerably below most reported rates. There was no difference in infection rate between groups with and without appendectomy (P = .47). Unless the procedure is technically difficult, appendectomy with elective cholecystectomy does not increase the chance of infection.

摘要

我前瞻性地研究了100例患者,以观察胆囊切除术时行“附带阑尾切除术”是否会影响伤口感染率。随机分组后,两组患者在年龄、体型和性别方面相似。47例患者接受了阑尾切除术。最常见的胆囊疾病是慢性结石性胆囊炎。11%的胆囊培养结果呈阳性。胆囊有细菌感染的患者平均年龄比该系列患者大14.5岁。6%的阑尾可见真正的病理改变。阑尾切除术使平均手术时间延长了6分钟。增加阑尾切除术后,术后住院时间未改变。未行阑尾切除术的患者无感染,而行阑尾切除术的组中有1例(2%)感染。总的1%感染率远低于大多数报告的感染率。行阑尾切除术组和未行阑尾切除术组之间的感染率无差异(P = 0.47)。除非手术操作技术上有困难,择期胆囊切除术时行阑尾切除术不会增加感染几率。

相似文献

1
Prospective analysis of the effect of incidental appendectomy on infection rate after cholecystectomy.胆囊切除术后附带阑尾切除术对感染率影响的前瞻性分析。
South Med J. 1987 Mar;80(3):292-5. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198703000-00004.
2
Wound sepsis after cholecystectomy. Influence of incidental appendectomy.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 1986 Aug;8(4):435-7. doi: 10.1097/00004836-198608000-00010.
3
Wound infection after cholecystectomy. Correlation between bacteria in bile and wound infection after operation on the gallbladder for acute and chronic gallstone disease.胆囊切除术后伤口感染。急性和慢性胆结石疾病行胆囊手术后胆汁中的细菌与伤口感染之间的相关性。
Eur J Surg. 1992 Feb;158(2):109-12.
4
The influence of biliary infection on the postoperative course after biliary tract surgery.胆道感染对胆道手术后病程的影响。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1977 May;67(5):456-62.
5
Incidental appendectomy with cholecystectomy: is the increased risk justified?阑尾切除术联合胆囊切除术:增加的风险是否合理?
Am Surg. 1987 Oct;53(10):553-7.
6
Infections and bacteriological data after laparoscopic and open gallbladder surgery.腹腔镜与开腹胆囊切除术后的感染及细菌学数据
J Hosp Infect. 1998 May;39(1):27-37. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(98)90240-7.
7
Wound sepsis after elective cholecystectomy. Restriction of prophylactic antibiotics to risk groups.择期胆囊切除术后伤口感染。将预防性抗生素的使用限制在高危人群。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1981;16(7):937-40. doi: 10.3109/00365528109181826.
8
Are bile bacteria relevant to septic complications following biliary surgery?
Br J Surg. 1984 Nov;71(11):845-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800711113.
9
Incidental appendectomy?--Yes.偶然进行的阑尾切除术?——是的。
Can J Surg. 1981 Mar;24(2):191-2.
10
Prophylactic appendicectomy during elective cholecystectomy: effects on morbidity. A prospective controlled study.
Int Surg. 1989 Jan-Mar;74(1):32-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Review. Laparoscopic appendicectomy: current status.综述。腹腔镜阑尾切除术:现状。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997 Nov;79(6):393-402.