Memon M A
Department of Surgery, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997 Nov;79(6):393-402.
Laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA), has failed to gain unequivocal acceptance by the general surgical community as an alternative to open appendicectomy (OA). This is because the early postoperative recovery leading to quicker hospital discharge, which led to the worldwide acceptance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, has not been universally seen with LA. Moreover, in the majority of the published series of LAs, there seems to be a trend towards an increased incidence of intra-abdominal abscesses. However, laparoscopy is superior to the 'watch and wait' policy where the diagnosis of appendicitis is questionable. Furthermore, since a large incision can be avoided by using the LA technique in obese patients, the incidence of postoperative morbidity can be reduced considerably. Nevertheless, before endorsing routine and widespread use of LA, it is essential that this technique is critically evaluated in well-designed, controlled, randomised trials, showing clearly the major benefits to the patient in terms of quicker hospital discharge, reduced postoperative pain, decreased wound infection and early return to full activities. Laparoscopic appendicectomy will never replace all open appendicectomies, but should become an alternative in certain groups of patients.
腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)作为开腹阑尾切除术(OA)的替代方法,尚未得到普通外科界的明确认可。这是因为,虽然早期术后恢复快从而能更快出院这一优势使得腹腔镜胆囊切除术被全球广泛接受,但LA并非普遍具有这一优势。此外,在大多数已发表的LA系列研究中,似乎存在腹腔内脓肿发生率增加的趋势。然而,在阑尾炎诊断存疑时,腹腔镜检查优于“观察等待”策略。此外,由于肥胖患者使用LA技术可避免大切口,术后发病率可大幅降低。尽管如此,在认可LA的常规广泛应用之前,必须在精心设计、对照、随机的试验中对该技术进行严格评估,明确显示其在更快出院、减轻术后疼痛、减少伤口感染以及早日完全恢复活动等方面给患者带来的主要益处。腹腔镜阑尾切除术永远无法取代所有的开腹阑尾切除术,但在某些特定患者群体中应成为一种选择。