Alm Carl E, Karlsten Anders, Madsen Jan E, Nordsletten Lars, Brattgjerd Jan E, Pripp Are H, Frihagen Frede, Röhrl Stephan M
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Bone Jt Open. 2024 Jan 19;5(1):37-45. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.51.BJO-2023-0082.R1.
Despite limited clinical scientific backing, an additional trochanteric stabilizing plate (TSP) has been advocated when treating unstable trochanteric fractures with a sliding hip screw (SHS). We aimed to explore whether the TSP would result in less post operative fracture motion, compared to SHS alone.
Overall, 31 patients with AO/OTA 31-A2 trochanteric fractures were randomized to either a SHS alone or a SHS with an additional TSP. To compare postoperative fracture motion, radiostereometric analysis (RSA) was performed before and after weightbearing, and then at four, eight, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. With the "after weightbearing" images as baseline, we calculated translations and rotations, including shortening and medialization of the femoral shaft.
Similar migration profiles were observed in all directions during the course of healing. At one year, eight patients in the SHS group and 12 patients in the TSP group were available for analysis, finding a clinically non-relevant, and statistically non-significant, difference in total translation of 1 mm (95% confidence interval -4.7 to 2.9) in favour of the TSP group. In line with the migration data, no significant differences in clinical outcomes were found.
The TSP did not influence the course of healing or postoperative fracture motion compared to SHS alone. Based on our results, routine use of the TSP in AO/OTA 31-A2 trochanteric fractures cannot be recommended. The TSP has been shown, in biomechanical studies, to increase stability in sliding hip screw constructs in both unstable and intermediate stable trochanteric fractures, but the clinical evidence is limited. This study showed no advantage of the TSP in unstable (AO 31-A2) fractures in elderly patients when fracture movement was evaluated with radiostereometric analysis.
尽管临床科学依据有限,但在使用滑动髋螺钉(SHS)治疗不稳定型转子间骨折时,有人主张额外使用转子间稳定钢板(TSP)。我们旨在探讨与单独使用SHS相比,TSP是否会减少术后骨折移位。
总共31例AO/OTA 31-A2型转子间骨折患者被随机分为单独使用SHS组或联合使用TSP组。为比较术后骨折移位情况,在负重前后以及术后4周、8周、12周、26周和52周进行放射立体测量分析(RSA)。以“负重后”图像为基线,我们计算了平移和旋转情况,包括股骨干的缩短和内移。
在愈合过程中,各个方向均观察到相似的移位情况。一年时,SHS组有8例患者、TSP组有12例患者可供分析,结果发现TSP组在总平移方面有1毫米的差异,临床意义不大且无统计学显著性(95%置信区间为-4.7至2.9),该差异有利于TSP组。与移位数据一致,临床结果未发现显著差异。
与单独使用SHS相比,TSP并未影响愈合过程或术后骨折移位。基于我们的研究结果,不建议在AO/OTA 31-A2型转子间骨折中常规使用TSP。生物力学研究表明,TSP可增加不稳定型和中间稳定型转子间骨折滑动髋螺钉结构的稳定性,但临床证据有限。本研究通过放射立体测量分析评估骨折移位时,未发现TSP在老年患者不稳定型(AO 31-A2)骨折中有优势。