Clinical Sciences Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Kingston-Upon-Hull, East Yorkshire, UK.
Department of Cardiology, Castle Hill Hospital, Hull University Teaching Hospitals Trust, Castle Road, Cottingham, East Yorkshire, UK.
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2024 Apr;21(2):101-114. doi: 10.1007/s11897-024-00643-3. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
Fluid retention or congestion is a major cause of symptoms, poor quality of life, and adverse outcome in patients with heart failure (HF). Despite advances in disease-modifying therapy, the mainstay of treatment for congestion-loop diuretics-has remained largely unchanged for 50 years. In these two articles (part I: loop diuretics and part II: combination therapy), we will review the history of diuretic treatment and the current trial evidence for different diuretic strategies and explore potential future directions of research.
We will assess recent trials including DOSE, TRANSFORM, ADVOR, CLOROTIC, OSPREY-AHF, and PUSH-AHF amongst others, and assess how these may influence current practice and future research. There are few data on which to base diuretic therapy in clinical practice. The most robust evidence is for high dose loop diuretic treatment over low-dose treatment for patients admitted to hospital with HF, yet this is not reflected in guidelines. There is an urgent need for more and better research on different diuretic strategies in patients with HF.
液体潴留或充血是心力衰竭(HF)患者出现症状、生活质量下降和预后不良的主要原因。尽管在疾病修正治疗方面取得了进展,但充血-袢利尿剂治疗方案作为主要治疗方法,50 年来基本没有改变。在这两篇文章中(第一部分:袢利尿剂和第二部分:联合治疗),我们将回顾利尿剂治疗的历史以及不同利尿剂策略的当前临床试验证据,并探讨未来研究的潜在方向。
我们将评估最近的试验,包括 DOSE、TRANSFORM、ADVOR、CLOROTIC、OSPREY-AHF 和 PUSH-AHF 等,并评估这些试验如何影响当前的实践和未来的研究。在临床实践中,我们几乎没有数据可以作为利尿剂治疗的依据。最有力的证据是对于因 HF 住院的患者,高剂量袢利尿剂治疗优于低剂量治疗,但这并未反映在指南中。迫切需要对 HF 患者的不同利尿剂策略进行更多和更好的研究。