Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA; Center on the Developing Child, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2024 Feb;8(2):147-158. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(23)00251-1.
Racial and ethnic inequities in paediatric care have received increased research attention over the past two decades, particularly in the past 5 years, alongside an increased societal focus on racism. In this Series paper, the first in a two-part Series focused on racism and child health in the USA, we summarise evidence on racial and ethnic inequities in the quality of paediatric care. We review studies published between Jan 1, 2017 and July 31, 2022, that are adjusted for or stratified by insurance status to account for group differences in access, and we exclude studies in which differences in access are probably driven by patient preferences or the appropriateness of intervention. Overall, the literature reveals widespread patterns of inequitable treatment across paediatric specialties, including neonatology, primary care, emergency medicine, inpatient and critical care, surgery, developmental disabilities, mental health care, endocrinology, and palliative care. The identified studies indicate that children from minoritised racial and ethnic groups received poorer health-care services relative to non-Hispanic White children, with most studies drawing on data from multiple sites, and accounting for indicators of family socioeconomic position and clinical characteristics (eg, comorbidities or condition severity). The studies discussed a range of potential causes for the observed disparities, including implicit biases and differences in site of care or clinician characteristics. We outline priorities for future research to better understand and address paediatric treatment inequities and implications for practice and policy. Policy changes within and beyond the health-care system, discussed further in the second paper of this Series, are essential to address the root causes of treatment inequities and to promote equitable and excellent health for all children.
在过去的二十年里,儿科护理中的种族和民族不平等问题引起了越来越多的研究关注,尤其是在过去的 5 年里,社会对种族主义的关注也有所增加。在本系列论文中,这是第一篇聚焦美国种族主义和儿童健康的论文,我们总结了儿科护理质量方面的种族和民族不平等的证据。我们回顾了 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 7 月 31 日期间发表的研究,这些研究调整了保险状况或按保险状况分层,以说明获得医疗服务方面的群体差异,并且我们排除了那些差异可能是由患者偏好或干预措施的适当性驱动的研究。总体而言,文献揭示了儿科各专业领域普遍存在的治疗不平等现象,包括新生儿科、初级保健、急诊医学、住院和重症监护、外科、发育障碍、心理健康护理、内分泌学和姑息治疗。已确定的研究表明,少数族裔和少数民族儿童接受的医疗服务比非西班牙裔白人儿童差,大多数研究都利用了来自多个地点的数据,并考虑了家庭社会经济地位和临床特征(例如,合并症或病情严重程度)的指标。这些研究讨论了观察到的差异的一系列潜在原因,包括隐含偏见以及护理地点或临床医生特征的差异。我们概述了未来研究的优先事项,以更好地理解和解决儿科治疗不平等问题,并为实践和政策提供依据。本系列论文的第二篇将进一步讨论,卫生保健系统内外的政策变化对于解决治疗不平等的根本原因以及促进所有儿童的公平和卓越健康至关重要。