Suppr超能文献

将种族主义命名为姑息治疗研究中不平等现象的根本原因:范围综述。

Naming racism as a root cause of inequities in palliative care research: a scoping review.

机构信息

Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, 60 Murray Street, 4th Floor, Box 13, Toronto, ON, M5T3L9, Canada.

Waakebiness-Bryce Institute for Indigenous Health, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, 6th floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Jun 10;23(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01465-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Racial and ethnic inequities in palliative care are well-established. The way researchers design and interpret studies investigating race- and ethnicity-based disparities has future implications on the interventions aimed to reduce these inequities. If racism is not discussed when contextualizing findings, it is less likely to be addressed and inequities will persist.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the characteristics of 12 years of academic literature that investigates race- or ethnicity-based disparities in palliative care access, outcomes and experiences, and determine the extent to which racism is discussed when interpreting findings.

METHODS

Following Arksey & O'Malley's methodology for scoping reviews, we searched bibliographic databases for primary, peer reviewed studies globally, in all languages, that collected race or ethnicity variables in a palliative care context (January 1, 2011 to October 17, 2023). We recorded study characteristics and categorized citations based on their research focus-whether race or ethnicity were examined as a major focus (analyzed as a primary independent variable or population of interest) or minor focus (analyzed as a secondary variable) of the research purpose, and the interpretation of findings-whether authors directly or indirectly discussed racism when contextualizing the study results.

RESULTS

We identified 3000 citations and included 181 in our review. Of these, most were from the United States (88.95%) and examined race or ethnicity as a major focus (71.27%). When interpreting findings, authors directly named racism in 7.18% of publications. They were more likely to use words closely associated with racism (20.44%) or describe systemic or individual factors (41.44%). Racism was directly named in 33.33% of articles published since 2021 versus 3.92% in the 10 years prior, suggesting it is becoming more common.

CONCLUSION

While the focus on race and ethnicity in palliative care research is increasing, there is room for improvement when acknowledging systemic factors - including racism - during data analysis. Researchers must be purposeful when investigating race and ethnicity, and identify how racism shapes palliative care access, outcomes and experiences of racially and ethnically minoritized patients.

摘要

背景

在姑息治疗中,存在着明显的种族和民族不平等现象。研究人员在设计和解释研究种族和民族差异时的方法,对旨在减少这些不平等的干预措施具有未来意义。如果在背景化研究结果时不讨论种族主义,那么就不太可能解决种族主义问题,不平等现象将持续存在。

目的

总结 12 年来调查姑息治疗中种族或民族差异的学术文献的特征,确定在解释研究结果时讨论种族主义的程度。

方法

我们按照阿克塞尔和奥马利的范围综述方法,在全球范围内搜索了所有语言的同行评审的原始研究,这些研究在姑息治疗背景下收集了种族或族裔变量(2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 10 月 17 日)。我们记录了研究特征,并根据研究重点将引用文献分类——种族或族裔是否被视为研究目的的主要重点(作为主要独立变量或研究重点人群进行分析)或次要重点(作为次要变量进行分析),以及研究结果的解释——作者在背景化研究结果时是否直接或间接地讨论了种族主义。

结果

我们确定了 3000 条引文,并在综述中纳入了 181 条引文。其中,大多数来自美国(88.95%),并将种族或族裔作为主要重点进行了研究(71.27%)。在解释研究结果时,作者在 7.18%的出版物中直接提到了种族主义。他们更有可能使用与种族主义密切相关的词(20.44%)或描述系统或个人因素(41.44%)。自 2021 年以来,直接提到种族主义的文章比例为 33.33%,而在之前的 10 年中为 3.92%,这表明这种情况越来越普遍。

结论

尽管姑息治疗研究中对种族和民族的关注正在增加,但在数据分析中承认系统因素(包括种族主义)仍有改进的空间。研究人员在研究种族和民族时必须有明确的目的,并确定种族主义如何影响少数族裔患者的姑息治疗机会、结果和体验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b17/11163751/5a7e5bbdf176/12904_2024_1465_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验