• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两臂均衡分配临床试验中最大耐受不平衡限制的随机化设计的稳态统计特性与实现。

Steady-state statistical properties and implementation of randomization designs with maximum tolerated imbalance restriction for two-arm equal allocation clinical trials.

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

Biometrics and Data Sciences Department, Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc, Ridgefield, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2024 Mar 15;43(6):1194-1212. doi: 10.1002/sim.10013. Epub 2024 Jan 20.

DOI:10.1002/sim.10013
PMID:38243729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10925840/
Abstract

In recent decades, several randomization designs have been proposed in the literature as better alternatives to the traditional permuted block design (PBD), providing higher allocation randomness under the same restriction of the maximum tolerated imbalance (MTI). However, PBD remains the most frequently used method for randomizing subjects in clinical trials. This status quo may reflect an inadequate awareness and appreciation of the statistical properties of these randomization designs, and a lack of simple methods for their implementation. This manuscript presents the analytic results of statistical properties for five randomization designs with MTI restriction based on their steady-state probabilities of the treatment imbalance Markov chain and compares them to those of the PBD. A unified framework for randomization sequence generation and real-time on-demand treatment assignment is proposed for the straightforward implementation of randomization algorithms with explicit formulas of conditional allocation probabilities. Topics associated with the evaluation, selection, and implementation of randomization designs are discussed. It is concluded that for two-arm equal allocation trials, several randomization designs offer stronger protection against selection bias than the PBD does, and their implementation is not necessarily more difficult than the implementation of the PBD.

摘要

近几十年来,文献中提出了几种随机化设计,作为传统区组随机化设计(PBD)的更好替代方案,在相同的最大允许不平衡限制(MTI)下提供更高的分配随机性。然而,PBD 仍然是临床试验中最常用的随机化受试者的方法。这种现状可能反映了对这些随机化设计的统计性质的认识和重视不足,以及缺乏简单的方法来实现这些设计。本文基于治疗失衡马尔可夫链的稳定状态概率,对五种具有 MTI 限制的随机化设计的统计性质进行了分析,并将其与 PBD 的结果进行了比较。提出了一种基于明确的条件分配概率公式的随机化序列生成和实时按需治疗分配的统一框架,用于直接实现随机化算法。讨论了与随机化设计的评估、选择和实现相关的主题。结论是,对于双臂等分配试验,几种随机化设计比 PBD 提供了更强的保护,防止选择偏倚,并且其实施不一定比 PBD 的实施更困难。

相似文献

1
Steady-state statistical properties and implementation of randomization designs with maximum tolerated imbalance restriction for two-arm equal allocation clinical trials.两臂均衡分配临床试验中最大耐受不平衡限制的随机化设计的稳态统计特性与实现。
Stat Med. 2024 Mar 15;43(6):1194-1212. doi: 10.1002/sim.10013. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
6
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果:面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
7
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.巴雷特食管的监测:通过系统评价、专家研讨会和经济模型探索不确定性
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
9
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Allocation Predictability of Individual Assignments in Restricted Randomization Designs for Two-Arm Equal Allocation Trials.双臂等额分配试验受限随机化设计中个体分配的分配可预测性
Stat Med. 2025 Feb 10;44(3-4):e10343. doi: 10.1002/sim.10343.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimal Randomization Designs for Large Multicenter Clinical Trials: From the National Institutes of Health Stroke Trials Network Funded by National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Experience.大型多中心临床试验的最佳随机设计:来自美国国立卫生研究院卒中试验网络,由美国国立卫生研究院/国立神经病学与卒中研究所资助的经验。
Stroke. 2023 Jul;54(7):1909-1919. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.040743. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
2
A roadmap to using randomization in clinical trials.在临床试验中使用随机化的路线图。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Aug 16;21(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01303-z.
3
Merged block randomisation: A novel randomisation procedure for small clinical trials.合并区块随机化:一种用于小型临床试验的新型随机化程序。
Clin Trials. 2019 Jun;16(3):246-252. doi: 10.1177/1740774519827957. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
4
A comparative study of restricted randomization procedures for multiarm trials with equal or unequal treatment allocation ratios.一种用于治疗分配比例相等或不相等的多臂试验的受限随机化程序的比较研究。
Stat Med. 2018 Sep 20;37(21):3056-3077. doi: 10.1002/sim.7817. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
5
Imbalance control in clinical trial subject randomization-from philosophy to strategy.临床试验受试者随机化中的不平衡控制——从理念到策略
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Sep;101:116-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.02.022. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
6
The asymptotic maximal procedure for subject randomization in clinical trials.临床试验中受试者随机化的渐进极大化程序。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Jul;27(7):2142-2153. doi: 10.1177/0962280216677107. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
7
Comparing MTI randomization procedures to blocked randomization.比较MTI随机化程序与区组随机化。
Stat Med. 2016 Feb 28;35(5):685-94. doi: 10.1002/sim.6637. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
8
Mass weighted urn design--A new randomization algorithm for unequal allocations.质量加权瓮设计——一种用于不等分配的新随机化算法。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Jul;43:209-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
9
Wide brick tunnel randomization - an unequal allocation procedure that limits the imbalance in treatment totals.宽砖式随机分组 - 一种限制处理总数不平衡的不等分配程序。
Stat Med. 2014 Apr 30;33(9):1514-30. doi: 10.1002/sim.6051. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
10
Minimal sufficient balance-a new strategy to balance baseline covariates and preserve randomness of treatment allocation.最小充分平衡——平衡基线协变量并保持治疗分配随机性的新策略。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2015 Dec;24(6):989-1002. doi: 10.1177/0962280212436447. Epub 2012 Jan 26.