• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国社区居民医疗服务利用的偏好异质性:一项陈述偏好离散选择实验

Preferences heterogeneity of health care utilization of community residents in China: a stated preference discrete choice experiment.

作者信息

Jiang Ming-Zhu, Fu Qiang, Xiong Ju-Yang, Li Xiang-Lin, Jia Er-Ping, Peng Ying-Ying, Shen Xiao

机构信息

School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 18;20(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05134-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-020-05134-4
PMID:32423447
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7236293/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To tackle the issue with the low usage of primary healthcare service in China, it is essential to align resource distribution with the preferences of the community residents. There are few academic researches for describing residents' perceived characteristics of healthcare services in China. This study aims to investigate the preferences of healthcare services utilization in community residents and explore the heterogeneity. The findings will be useful for the policy makers to take targeted measures to tailor the provision of healthcare services.

METHODS

The face-to-face interviews and surveys were conducted to elicit four key attributes (care provider; mode of services; cost; travel time) of the preference from community residents for healthcare utilization. A rational test was presented first to confirm the consistency, and then 16 pairs of choice tasks with 12 sociodemographic items were given to the respondents. Two hypothetical options for each set, without an opt-out option, were presented in each choice task. The latent class analysis (LCA) was used to analyse the data.

RESULTS

Two thousand one hundred sixty respondents from 36 communities in 6 cities were recruited for our study. 2019 (93.47%) respondents completed valid discrete choice experiment (DCE) questionnaires. The LCA results suggested that four groups of similar preferences were identified. The first group (27.29%) labelled as "Comprehensive consideration" had an even preference of all four attributes. The second group (37.79%) labelled as "Price-driven" preferred low-price healthcare services. The third group labelled as "Near distance" showed a clear preference for seeking healthcare services nearby. The fourth group (34.18%) labelled as "Quality seeker" preferred the healthcare service provided by experts. Willingness to pay (WTP) results showed that people were willing to accept CNY202.12($29.37) for Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) services and willing to pay CNY604.31($87.81) for the service provided by experts.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study qualitatively measures the distinct preferences for healthcare utilization in community residents in China. The results suggest that the care provider, mode of services, travel time and cost should be considered in priority setting decisions. The study, however, reveals substantial disagreement in opinion of TCM between different population subgroups.

摘要

背景

为解决中国基层医疗服务利用率低的问题,使资源分配与社区居民的偏好相匹配至关重要。目前国内鲜有描述居民对医疗服务感知特征的学术研究。本研究旨在调查社区居民对医疗服务利用的偏好,并探讨其异质性。研究结果将有助于政策制定者采取针对性措施来调整医疗服务的提供。

方法

通过面对面访谈和调查,获取社区居民对医疗服务利用偏好的四个关键属性(医疗服务提供者;服务模式;成本;出行时间)。首先进行合理性测试以确认一致性,然后向受访者给出16对包含12个社会人口学项目的选择任务。每个选择任务中有两个假设选项,且无退出选项。采用潜在类别分析(LCA)对数据进行分析。

结果

我们的研究招募了来自6个城市36个社区的2160名受访者。2019名(93.47%)受访者完成了有效的离散选择实验(DCE)问卷。LCA结果表明识别出了四组相似的偏好。第一组(27.29%)被标记为“综合考量型”,对所有四个属性偏好较为均衡。第二组(37.79%)被标记为“价格驱动型”,偏好低价医疗服务。第三组被标记为“距离近优先型”,明显偏好就近寻求医疗服务。第四组(34.18%)被标记为“追求质量型”,偏好专家提供的医疗服务。支付意愿(WTP)结果显示,人们愿意为中医服务支付202.12元人民币(29.37美元),愿意为专家提供的服务支付604.31元人民币(87.81美元)。

结论

我们的研究定性地衡量了中国社区居民对医疗服务利用的不同偏好。结果表明,在优先级设定决策中应考虑医疗服务提供者、服务模式、出行时间和成本。然而,研究揭示了不同人群亚组在中医观点上存在重大分歧。

相似文献

1
Preferences heterogeneity of health care utilization of community residents in China: a stated preference discrete choice experiment.中国社区居民医疗服务利用的偏好异质性:一项陈述偏好离散选择实验
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 18;20(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05134-4.
2
Community residents' preferences for chronic disease management in Primary Care Facilities in China: a stated preference survey.中国基层医疗机构中社区居民对慢性病管理的偏好:一项陈述偏好调查
Arch Public Health. 2021 Nov 26;79(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00728-8.
3
Treatment Preferences of Residents Assumed to Have Severe Chronic Diseases in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.中国假设患有严重慢性病的居民的治疗偏好:离散选择实验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 13;17(22):8420. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228420.
4
Preferences of Patients with Non-Communicable Diseases for Primary Healthcare Facilities: A Discrete Choice Experiment in Wuhan, China.非传染性疾病患者对基层医疗保健设施的偏好:来自中国武汉的离散选择实验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 4;17(11):3987. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113987.
5
Preference of primary care patients for home-based healthcare and support services: a discrete choice experiment in China.基层医疗患者对居家医疗保健和支持服务的偏好:中国的一项离散选择实验
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 18;12:1324776. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1324776. eCollection 2024.
6
Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Herpes Zoster Vaccination Among Chinese Adults: Discrete Choice Experiment.中国人对带状疱疹疫苗接种的偏好和支付意愿:离散选择实验。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Aug 9;10:e51242. doi: 10.2196/51242.
7
Patient Preferences for Attributes of Androgen Deprivation Therapies in Prostate Cancer: A Discrete Choice Experiment with Latent Class Analysis.患者对前列腺癌雄激素剥夺治疗属性的偏好:基于潜在类别分析的离散选择实验。
Adv Ther. 2024 Oct;41(10):3934-3950. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02955-1. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
8
Patient preferences for community pharmacy asthma services: a discrete choice experiment.患者对社区药店哮喘服务的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Oct 1;30(10):961-76. doi: 10.2165/11594350-000000000-00000.
9
Exploring determinants of health provider choice and heterogeneity in preference among outpatients in Beijing: a labelled discrete choice experiment.探讨北京门诊患者选择卫生服务提供者的决定因素和偏好异质性:一项标记离散选择实验。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 3;9(4):e023363. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023363.
10
The choice and preference for public-private health care among urban residents in China: evidence from a discrete choice experiment.中国城市居民对公私医疗保健的选择与偏好:来自离散选择实验的证据
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 18;16(1):580. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1829-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatial optimization of hierarchical healthcare facilities driven by multi-source data: a case study of Shenyang, China.多源数据驱动的分级医疗设施空间优化:以中国沈阳为例
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 25;13:1640070. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1640070. eCollection 2025.
2
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
3
Preference for community health services in people with chronic diseases: a discrete choice experiment in China.慢性病患者对社区卫生服务的偏好:一项中国的离散选择实验
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 20;12:1479237. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1479237. eCollection 2024.
4
The digitalization of emergency department triage: the perspectives of health professionals and patients.急诊科分诊的数字化:卫生专业人员和患者的观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 15;24(1):1406. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11862-8.
5
Choices of medical institutions and associated factors in older patients with multimorbidity in stabilization period in China: A study based on logistic regression and decision tree model.中国老年多病共存稳定期患者的医疗机构选择及其相关因素:一项基于逻辑回归和决策树模型的研究
Health Care Sci. 2023 Oct 16;2(6):359-369. doi: 10.1002/hcs2.73. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
The association between internet use and the choice of medical institution among Chinese older adults.互联网使用与中国老年人选择医疗机构之间的关系。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 21;24(1):537. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04994-3.
7
Preferences for Physical Examination Service in Community Health Service Center in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.中国社区卫生服务中心体格检查服务偏好:一项离散选择实验
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Jan 6;18:39-51. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S440896. eCollection 2024.
8
Public preference on sharing health data to inform research, health policy and clinical practice in Australia: A stated preference experiment.澳大利亚民众对分享健康数据以支持研究、卫生政策和临床实践的偏好:一项意愿调查实验。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0290528. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290528. eCollection 2023.
9
Assessing Patients' Preferences for Preventive Dental Care: A Discrete Choice Experiment.评估患者对预防性牙科护理的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 24;15(8):e44028. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44028. eCollection 2023 Aug.
10
Patient experience in community health services and first choice for medical attention: A cross-sectional study in Wuhan, China.患者在社区卫生服务中的体验和对医疗服务的第一选择:一项在中国武汉的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 25;18(7):e0288164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288164. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
10 years of health-care reform in China: progress and gaps in Universal Health Coverage.中国医改十年:全民医保体系建设的成就与挑战
Lancet. 2019 Sep 28;394(10204):1192-1204. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32136-1.
2
Public preferences for health care facilities in rural China: A discrete choice experiment.公众对中国农村地区医疗机构的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Sep;237:112396. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112396. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
3
What can we learn from China's health system reform?我们能从中国的医疗卫生体制改革中学到什么?
BMJ. 2019 Jun 19;365:l2349. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l2349.
4
Assessing Rationality in Discrete Choice Experiments in Health: An Investigation into the Use of Dominance Tests.评估健康领域离散选择实验中的理性:对优势检验使用情况的调查。
Value Health. 2018 Oct;21(10):1192-1197. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.04.1822. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
5
Parental Preferences for the Organization of Preschool Vaccination Programs Including Financial Incentives: A Discrete Choice Experiment.包括经济激励措施在内的学龄前儿童疫苗接种计划组织的家长偏好:一项离散选择实验
MDM Policy Pract. 2017 May 23;2(1):2381468317708319. doi: 10.1177/2381468317708319. eCollection 2017 Jan-Jun.
6
What Characteristics of Nursing Homes Are Most Valued by Consumers? A Discrete Choice Experiment with Residents and Family Members.消费者最看重养老院的哪些特点?一项针对居民和家属的离散选择实验。
Value Health. 2018 Jul;21(7):843-849. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.11.004. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
7
Registered nurses' preferences for rural and urban jobs: A discrete choice experiment.注册护士对农村和城市工作的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Oct;86:11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 May 26.
8
How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity.离散选择实验在多大程度上能够预测健康选择?系统评价和元分析的外部有效性。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Nov;19(8):1053-1066. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0954-6. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
9
Tuberculosis detection and the challenges of integrated care in rural China: A cross-sectional standardized patient study.中国农村地区的结核病检测与综合医疗面临的挑战:一项横断面标准化患者研究。
PLoS Med. 2017 Oct 17;14(10):e1002405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002405. eCollection 2017 Oct.
10
Patients' preferences for primary health care - a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments.患者对初级卫生保健的偏好——离散选择实验的系统文献综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2433-7.