Suppr超能文献

用于评估足部溃疡高风险糖尿病患者足底组织累积应力的新生物力学模型。

New biomechanical models for cumulative plantar tissue stress assessment in people with diabetes at high risk of foot ulceration.

作者信息

Hulshof Chantal M, van Netten Jaap J, Oosterhof Caroline M, van der Poel Jonne, Pijnappels Mirjam, Bus Sicco A

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Ageing & Vitality and Rehabilitation & Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Ageing & Vitality and Rehabilitation & Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Human Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Biomech. 2024 Jan;163:111940. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.111940. Epub 2024 Jan 11.

Abstract

To better understand stress-related foot ulceration in diabetes, the cumulative plantar tissue stress (CPTS) should be quantified accurately, but also feasibly for clinical use. We developed multiple CPTS models with varying complexity and investigated their agreement with the most comprehensive reference model available. We assessed 52 participants with diabetes and high foot ulcer risk for barefoot and in-shoe plantar pressures during overground walking at different speeds, standing, sit-to-stand transitions, and stair walking. Level of these weight-bearing activities along with footwear adherence were objectively measured over seven days. The reference CPTS-model included the pressure-time integrals of each walking stride (barefoot and shod), specified for speed; standing period (barefoot and shod); transition and stair walking stride. We compared four CPTS-models with increasing number of input parameters (models 1-4) with the reference model, using repeated measures ANOVA, Pearson's correlation and Bland-Altman plots. For the clinically-relevant metatarsal 1 region, calculated CPTS was lower for the four CPTS-models compared to reference (Δ770, Δ466, Δ24 and Δ12 MPas/day, respectively). CPTS associated moderately with the reference model for model 1 (r = 0.551) and very strongly for models 2-4 (r ≥ 0.937). Limits of agreement were large for models 1 and 2 (-728;2269 and -302;1233 MPas/day), and small for models 3 and 4 (-43;92 and -54;78 MPas/day). CPTS in models 3 and 4 best agreed with the reference model, where model 3 required fewer parameters, i.e., pressure-time integrals of each walking stride and standing period while barefoot and shod. These parameters need to be included for accurate and feasible CPTS assessment.

摘要

为了更好地理解糖尿病中与压力相关的足部溃疡,累积足底组织压力(CPTS)应被准确量化,同时在临床应用中也要切实可行。我们开发了多个复杂度不同的CPTS模型,并研究了它们与现有最全面参考模型的一致性。我们评估了52名糖尿病患者且足部溃疡风险高的参与者,测量他们在不同速度的地面行走、站立、从坐到站的转换以及上楼梯行走时的赤脚和穿鞋状态下的足底压力。在七天内客观测量这些负重活动的水平以及鞋类贴合度。参考CPTS模型包括每个行走步幅(赤脚和穿鞋)的压力 - 时间积分,按速度指定;站立期(赤脚和穿鞋);转换和上楼梯行走步幅。我们使用重复测量方差分析、皮尔逊相关性和布兰德 - 奥特曼图,将四个输入参数数量不断增加的CPTS模型(模型1 - 4)与参考模型进行比较。对于临床相关的第一跖骨区域,四个CPTS模型计算出的CPTS低于参考值(分别为Δ770、Δ466、Δ24和Δ12 MPas/天)。模型1的CPTS与参考模型中度相关(r = 0.551),模型2 - 4则与参考模型高度相关(r≥0.937)。模型1和2的一致性界限较大(-728;2269和-302;1233 MPas/天),模型3和4的一致性界限较小(-43;92和-54;78 MPas/天)。模型3和4中的CPTS与参考模型的一致性最佳,其中模型3所需参数较少,即每个行走步幅和站立期(赤脚和穿鞋)的压力 - 时间积分。为了进行准确且可行的CPTS评估,需要纳入这些参数。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验