Exercise Intervention for Health Research Group (EXINH-RG), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Physiotherapy in Motion Multispeciality Research Group (PTinMOTION), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2024 Apr;65:152377. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152377. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
The aim of the present review was (1) to determine the effects of exercise based-interventions (EBIs) on pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory biomarkers in patients with fibromyalgia (FM), and (2) to determine the most effective type (acute or maintained) and modality (aerobic, resistance, etc.).
A systematic search was conducted in various electronic databases to identify all the relevant studies: Medline (PubMed), PEDro, EBSCO and Google Scholar. Clinical trials assessing the effects of EBIs in patients with FM were selected. Methodological quality was evaluated by two independent investigators using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Qualitative analysis was based on the classification of the results into levels of evidence according to GRADE.
Eleven studies were included. The meta-analysis showed a statistically significant decrease in proinflammatory biomarkers by EBIs with a large clinical effect in 19 comparisons (SMD: 1.74; 95 % CI: 0.85-2.62; p < 0.05), especially for IL8. The certainty of the evidence was low. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant increase in anti-inflammatory biomarkers (IL10) by EBIs in 6 comparisons and very low certainty of evidence. Evidence was found for acute and maintained effects of exercise, with aerobic and aquatic exercise modalities showing better improvements than resistance exercise.
EBIs are effective in inducing an immunomodulatory response in FM, characterized by decreased pro-inflammatory signaling. However, there was no evidence of an increase in anti-inflammatory biomarkers. These results should be interpreted with caution due to low certainty of evidence.
本综述的目的是:(1)确定基于运动的干预措施(EBIs)对纤维肌痛(FM)患者促炎和抗炎生物标志物的影响;(2)确定最有效的类型(急性或维持性)和方式(有氧运动、抗阻运动等)。
系统检索了多个电子数据库,以确定所有相关研究:Medline(PubMed)、PEDro、EBSCO 和 Google Scholar。选择了评估 EBIs 对 FM 患者影响的临床试验。两名独立的研究者使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估方法学质量。定性分析是根据 GRADE 将结果分类为证据水平。
纳入了 11 项研究。meta 分析显示,EBIs 可显著降低促炎生物标志物,19 项比较中有大的临床效果(SMD:1.74;95%CI:0.85-2.62;p<0.05),特别是 IL8。证据的确定性为低。meta 分析显示,EBIs 对抗炎生物标志物(IL10)无统计学显著增加,证据确定性非常低。有证据表明急性和维持性运动的效果,有氧运动和水上运动方式比抗阻运动显示出更好的改善。
EBIs 在 FM 中有效诱导免疫调节反应,表现为促炎信号降低。然而,没有证据表明抗炎生物标志物增加。由于证据确定性低,这些结果应谨慎解释。