• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Shaping new norms for AI.塑造人工智能新规范。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Mar 11;379(1897):20230028. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0028. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
2
Social norm change: drivers and consequences.社会规范的改变:驱动因素与后果。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Mar 11;379(1897):20230023. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0023. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
3
Artificial Intelligence Technologies and Practical Normativity/Normality: Investigating Practices beyond the Public Space.人工智能技术与实践规范性/常态性:探究公共空间之外的实践
Open Res Eur. 2024 Mar 11;3:160. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.16536.2. eCollection 2023.
4
Risk, sanctions and norm change: the formation and decay of social distancing norms.风险、制裁与规范变迁:社交距离规范的形成与消解。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Mar 11;379(1897):20230035. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0035. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
5
Modelling social norms: an integration of the norm-utility approach with beliefs dynamics.建模社会规范:规范效用方法与信念动态的整合。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Mar 11;379(1897):20230027. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0027. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
6
Cultural influences on the effects of social norm appeals.文化对社会规范呼吁效果的影响。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Mar 11;379(1897):20230036. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0036. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
7
A research agenda for the study of social norm change.社会规范变化研究议程
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2022 Jul 11;380(2227):20200411. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0411. Epub 2022 May 23.
8
AI for identifying social norm violation.人工智能用于识别社会规范违反行为。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 19;13(1):8103. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35350-x.
9
Human and nonhuman norms: a dimensional framework.人类与非人类规范:一个维度框架。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Mar 11;379(1897):20230026. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0026. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
10
[Artificial intelligence: How will ChatGPT and other AI applications change our everyday medical practice?].[人工智能:ChatGPT和其他人工智能应用将如何改变我们的日常医疗实践?]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2023 Jun;118(5):366-371. doi: 10.1007/s00063-023-01019-6. Epub 2023 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Moral judgments in online discourse are not biased by gender.网络话语中的道德判断不存在性别偏见。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21555. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08749-x.
2
Emergent social conventions and collective bias in LLM populations.大语言模型群体中的新兴社会习俗和集体偏见。
Sci Adv. 2025 May 16;11(20):eadu9368. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adu9368. Epub 2025 May 14.
3
Testing the limits of large language models in debating humans.测试大语言模型在与人类辩论中的极限。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 22;15(1):13852. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98378-1.
4
Embracing the future: Integrating ChatGPT into China's nursing education system.拥抱未来:将ChatGPT融入中国护理教育体系。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2024 Mar 7;11(2):295-299. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.03.006. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Social norm change: drivers and consequences.社会规范的改变:驱动因素与后果。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Mar 11;379(1897):20230023. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0023. Epub 2024 Jan 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Threats by artificial intelligence to human health and human existence.人工智能对人类健康和人类生存的威胁。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 May;8(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010435.
2
Journals take up arms against AI-written text.期刊杂志联手抵制 AI 生成文本。
Science. 2023 Feb 24;379(6634):740-741. doi: 10.1126/science.adh2762. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
3
Nonhuman "Authors" and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge.非人类“作者”以及对科学出版物和医学知识完整性的影响。
JAMA. 2023 Feb 28;329(8):637-639. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.1344.
4
ChatGPT is fun, but not an author.ChatGPT 很有趣,但不是作者。
Science. 2023 Jan 27;379(6630):313. doi: 10.1126/science.adg7879. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
5
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove.研究论文将ChatGPT列为作者:许多科学家表示反对。
Nature. 2023 Jan;613(7945):620-621. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z.
6
A research agenda for the study of social norm change.社会规范变化研究议程
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2022 Jul 11;380(2227):20200411. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0411. Epub 2022 May 23.
7
The echo chamber effect on social media.社交媒体的回音室效应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Mar 2;118(9). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2023301118.
8
The dynamics of norm change in the cultural evolution of language.语言文化进化中规范变化的动力学。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Aug 14;115(33):8260-8265. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1721059115. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
9
Experimental evidence for tipping points in social convention.社会规范转折点的实验证据。
Science. 2018 Jun 8;360(6393):1116-1119. doi: 10.1126/science.aas8827.
10
The emergence of consensus: a primer.共识的形成:入门指南。
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Feb 21;5(2):172189. doi: 10.1098/rsos.172189. eCollection 2018 Feb.

塑造人工智能新规范。

Shaping new norms for AI.

机构信息

City, University of London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK.

The Alan Turing Institute, British Library, 96 Euston Road, London NW1 2DB, UK.

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Mar 11;379(1897):20230028. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0028. Epub 2024 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1098/rstb.2023.0028
PMID:38244607
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10799727/
Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly integrated into our lives, the need for new norms is urgent. However, AI evolves at a much faster pace than the characteristic time of norm formation, posing an unprecedented challenge to our societies. This paper examines possible criticalities of the processes of norm formation surrounding AI. It focuses on how new norms can be established, rather than on what these norms should be. It distinguishes different scenarios based on the centralization or decentralization of the norm formation process, analysing the cases where new norms are shaped by formal authorities or informal institutions, or emerge spontaneously in a bottom-up fashion. On the latter point, the paper reports a conversation with ChatGPT in which the LLM discusses some of the emerging norms it has observed. Far from seeking exhaustiveness, this article aims to offer readers interpretive tools to frame society's response to the growing pervasiveness of AI. An outlook on how AI could influence the formation of future social norms emphasizes the importance for open societies to anchor their formal deliberation process in an open, inclusive and transparent public discourse. This article is part of the theme issue 'Social norm change: drivers and consequences'.

摘要

随着人工智能(AI)日益融入我们的生活,制定新规范的需求迫在眉睫。然而,AI 的发展速度远远超过规范形成的特征时间,这对我们的社会构成了前所未有的挑战。本文探讨了围绕 AI 的规范形成过程可能出现的问题。它侧重于如何建立新规范,而不是这些规范应该是什么。它根据规范形成过程的集中化或分散化来区分不同的情况,分析了新规范是由正式权威机构还是非正式机构形成的情况,或者是自发地自下而上出现的情况。在后一种情况下,本文报告了与 ChatGPT 的一次对话,在对话中,该大语言模型讨论了它观察到的一些新兴规范。本文远非追求详尽无遗,而是旨在为读者提供解释工具,以构建社会对 AI 日益普及的应对框架。展望 AI 如何影响未来社会规范的形成,强调了开放社会将其正式审议过程建立在开放、包容和透明的公共话语基础上的重要性。本文是“社会规范变化:驱动因素和后果”主题问题的一部分。