澳大利亚糖尿病患者中基于人工智能的糖尿病视网膜病变筛查的人群影响和成本效益:一项成本效益分析
Population impact and cost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence-based diabetic retinopathy screening in people living with diabetes in Australia: a cost effectiveness analysis.
作者信息
Hu Wenyi, Joseph Sanil, Li Rui, Woods Ekaterina, Sun Jason, Shen Mingwang, Jan Catherine Lingxue, Zhu Zhuoting, He Mingguang, Zhang Lei
机构信息
Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Surgery (Ophthalmology), The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
出版信息
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Jan 10;67:102387. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102387. eCollection 2024 Jan.
BACKGROUND
We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of an artificial intelligence-(AI) based diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening system in the primary care setting for both non-Indigenous and Indigenous people living with diabetes in Australia.
METHODS
We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis between January 01, 2022 and August 01, 2023. A decision-analytic Markov model was constructed to simulate DR progression in a population of 1,197,818 non-Indigenous and 65,160 Indigenous Australians living with diabetes aged ≥20 years over 40 years. From a healthcare provider's perspective, we compared current practice to three primary care AI-based screening scenarios-(A) substitution of current manual grading, (B) scaling up to patient acceptance level, and (C) achieving universal screening. Study results were presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), benefit-cost ratio (BCR), and net monetary benefits (NMB). A Willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of AU$50,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and a discount rate of 3.5% were adopted in this study.
FINDINGS
With the status quo, the non-Indigenous diabetic population was projected to develop 96,269 blindness cases, resulting in AU$13,039.6 m spending on DR screening and treatment during 2020-2060. In comparison, all three intervention scenarios were effective and cost-saving. In particular, if a universal screening program was to be implemented (Scenario C), it would prevent 38,347 blindness cases, gain 172,090 QALYs and save AU$595.8 m, leading to a BCR of 3.96 and NMB of AU$9,200 m. Similar findings were also reported in the Indigenous population. With the status quo, 3,396 Indigenous individuals would develop blindness, which would cost the health system AU$796.0 m during 2020-2060. All three intervention scenarios were cost-saving for the Indigenous population. Notably, universal AI-based DR screening (Scenario C) would prevent 1,211 blindness cases and gain 9,800 QALYs in the Indigenous population, leading to a saving of AU$19.2 m with a BCR of 1.62 and NMB of AU$509 m.
INTERPRETATION
Our findings suggest that implementing AI-based DR screening in primary care is highly effective and cost-saving in both Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations.
FUNDING
This project received grant funding from the Australian Government: the National Critical Research Infrastructure Initiative, Medical Research Future Fund (MRFAI00035) and the NHMRC Investigator Grant (APP1175405). The contents of the published material are solely the responsibility of the Administering Institution, a participating institution or individual authors and do not reflect the views of the NHMRC. This work was supported by the Global STEM Professorship Scheme (P0046113), the Fundamental Research Funds of the State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Project of Investigation on Health Status of Employees in Financial Industry in Guangzhou, China (Z012014075). The Centre for Eye Research Australia receives Operational Infrastructure Support from the Victorian State Government. W.H. is supported by the Melbourne Research Scholarship established by the University of Melbourne. The funding source had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
背景
我们旨在评估基于人工智能(AI)的糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)筛查系统在澳大利亚初级医疗环境中,对于非原住民和原住民糖尿病患者的成本效益。
方法
我们在2022年1月1日至2023年8月1日期间进行了成本效益分析。构建了一个决策分析马尔可夫模型,以模拟年龄≥20岁的1197818名非原住民和65160名原住民澳大利亚糖尿病患者在40年中的DR进展情况。从医疗服务提供者的角度出发,我们将当前的做法与三种基于初级医疗AI的筛查方案进行了比较:(A)替代当前的人工分级,(B)扩大到患者接受水平,以及(C)实现普遍筛查。研究结果以增量成本效益比(ICER)、效益成本比(BCR)和净货币效益(NMB)表示。本研究采用每质量调整生命年(QALY)50000澳元的支付意愿(WTP)阈值和3.5%的贴现率。
结果
在现状下,预计非原住民糖尿病患者将出现96269例失明病例,在2020 - 2060年期间,DR筛查和治疗的花费将达到130.396亿澳元。相比之下,所有三种干预方案都是有效的且节省成本。特别是,如果实施普遍筛查计划(方案C),将预防38347例失明病例,获得172090个QALY,并节省5.958亿澳元,效益成本比为3.96,净货币效益为92亿澳元。原住民人群也有类似的发现。在现状下,3396名原住民将出现失明,在2020 - 2060年期间,这将使卫生系统花费7.96亿澳元。所有三种干预方案对原住民人群都是节省成本的。值得注意的是,基于AI的普遍DR筛查(方案C)将预防1211例失明病例,并在原住民人群中获得9800个QALY,节省1920万澳元,效益成本比为1.62,净货币效益为5.09亿澳元。
解读
我们的研究结果表明,在初级医疗中实施基于AI的DR筛查在原住民和非原住民人群中都是高效且节省成本的。
资金
本项目获得了澳大利亚政府提供的资助:国家关键研究基础设施计划、医学研究未来基金(MRFAI00035)和NHMRC研究员资助(APP1175405)。已发表材料的内容仅由管理机构、参与机构或个人作者负责,并不反映NHMRC的观点。本研究得到了全球STEM教授计划(P(0046113)、眼科学国家重点实验室基础研究基金、中国广州金融行业员工健康状况调查项目(Z012014075)的支持。澳大利亚眼研究中心获得了维多利亚州政府的运营基础设施支持。W.H.得到了墨尔本大学设立的墨尔本研究奖学金的支持。资助来源在研究的设计和实施、数据的收集、管理、分析和解释、稿件的准备、审核或批准以及决定提交稿件发表等方面均未发挥作用。