Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
J Hum Hypertens. 2024 May;38(5):430-436. doi: 10.1038/s41371-023-00888-w. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
Aortic stiffness, measured by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), is a predictor of cardiovascular (CV) mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Aortic stiffness increases aortic systolic and pulse pressures (cSBP, cPP) and augmentation index adjusted for a heart rate of 75 beats per minute (AIx@75). In this study, we examined if the integration of multiple components of central blood pressure and aortic stiffness (ICPS) into risk score categories could improve CV mortality prediction in ESRD. In a prospective cohort of 311 patients with ESRD on dialysis who underwent vascular assessment at baseline, 118 CV deaths occurred after a median follow-up of 3.1 years. The relationship between hemodynamic parameters and CV mortality was analyzed through Kaplan-Meier and Cox survival analysis. ICPS risk score from 0 to 5 points were calculated from points given to tertiles, and were regrouped into three risk categories (Average, High, Very-High). A strong association was found between the ICPS risk categories and CV mortality (High risk HR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.05-4.62, P = 0.036); Very-High risk (HR = 4.44, 95% CI: 2.21-8.92, P < 0.001) as compared to the Average risk group. The Very-High risk category remained associated with CV mortality (HR = 3.55, 95% CI: 1.37-9.21, P = 0.009) after adjustment for traditional CV risk factors as compared to the Average risk group. While higher C-statistics value of ICPS categories (C: 0.627, 95% CI: 0.578-0.676, P = 0.001) was not statistically superior to PWV, cPP or AIx@75, the use of ICPS categories resulted in a continuous net reclassification index of 0.56 (95% CI: 0.07-0.99). In conclusion, integration of multiple components of central blood pressure and aortic stiffness may potentially be useful for better prediction of CV mortality in this cohort.
主动脉僵硬度通过颈股脉搏波速度(PWV)来测量,是终末期肾病(ESRD)患者心血管(CV)死亡率的预测因子。主动脉僵硬度增加了主动脉收缩压和脉搏压(cSBP,cPP)和校正心率为 75 次/分钟的增强指数(AIx@75)。在这项研究中,我们研究了将中心血压和主动脉僵硬度的多个成分(ICPS)整合到风险评分类别中是否可以改善 ESRD 患者的 CV 死亡率预测。在一项前瞻性队列研究中,311 名接受透析的 ESRD 患者在基线时接受了血管评估,中位随访 3.1 年后发生了 118 例 CV 死亡。通过 Kaplan-Meier 和 Cox 生存分析分析了血流动力学参数与 CV 死亡率之间的关系。从 tertiles 中给出的分数计算了 ICPS 风险评分从 0 到 5 分,并重新分组为三个风险类别(平均、高、非常高)。ICPS 风险类别与 CV 死亡率之间存在很强的关联(高风险 HR=2.20,95%CI:1.05-4.62,P=0.036);与平均风险组相比,非常高风险(HR=4.44,95%CI:2.21-8.92,P<0.001)。与平均风险组相比,调整传统 CV 危险因素后,非常高风险类别仍然与 CV 死亡率相关(HR=3.55,95%CI:1.37-9.21,P=0.009)。虽然 ICPS 类别的更高 C 统计量值(C:0.627,95%CI:0.578-0.676,P=0.001)在统计学上并不优于 PWV、cPP 或 AIx@75,但使用 ICPS 类别可导致连续净重新分类指数为 0.56(95%CI:0.07-0.99)。总之,整合中心血压和主动脉僵硬度的多个成分可能对该队列的 CV 死亡率预测有用。