Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.
University of Tokyo Spine Group (UTSG).
Clin Spine Surg. 2024 Jul 1;37(6):E257-E263. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001572. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
Retrospective cohort study.
The aim of the present study is to investigate the coexisting lower back pain (LBP) in patients with cervical myelopathy and to evaluate changes in LBP after cervical spine surgery.
Only a few studies with a small number of participants have evaluated the association between cervical myelopathy surgery and postoperative improvement in LBP.
Patients who underwent primary cervical decompression surgery with or without fusion for myelopathy and completed preoperative and 1-year postoperative questionnaires were reviewed using a prospectively collected database involving 9 tertiary referral hospitals. The questionnaires included the patient-reported Japanese Orthopaedic Association (PRO-JOA) score and Numerical Rating Scales (NRS). The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for NRS-LBP was defined as >30% improvement from baseline. Patient demographics, characteristics, and PRO-JOA score were compared between patients with and without concurrent LBP, and the contributor to achieving the MCID for LBP was analyzed using logistic regression analysis.
A total of 786 consecutive patients with cervical myelopathy were included, of which 525 (67%) presented with concurrent LBP. LBP was associated with a higher body mass index ( P <0.001) and worse preoperative PRO-JOA score ( P <0.001). Among the 525 patients with concurrent LBP, the mean postoperative NRS-LBP significantly improved from 4.5±2.4 to 3.4±2.7 ( P <0.01) postoperatively, with 248 (47%) patients reaching the MCID cutoff. Patients with a PRO-JOA recovery rate >50% were more likely to achieve MCID compared with those with a recovery rate <0% (adjusted odd ratio 4.02, P <0.001).
More than 50% of patients with myelopathy reported improvement in LBP after cervical spine surgery, and 47% achieved the MCID for LBP, which was positively correlated with a better PRO-JOA recovery rate. Treating cervical myelopathy in patients with concomitant LBP may be sufficient to mitigate concomitant LBP.
Level III.
回顾性队列研究。
本研究旨在探讨颈椎脊髓病患者同时存在的下腰痛(LBP),并评估颈椎手术后 LBP 的变化。
仅有少数几项研究纳入了少量参与者,评估了颈椎脊髓病手术与术后 LBP 改善之间的关联。
使用前瞻性收集的数据库回顾了在 9 家三级转诊医院接受原发性颈椎减压手术(伴或不伴融合)治疗脊髓病且完成术前和 1 年术后问卷调查的患者。问卷包括患者报告的日本骨科协会(PRO-JOA)评分和数字评分量表(NRS)。NRS-LBP 的最小临床重要差异(MCID)定义为与基线相比改善>30%。比较伴有和不伴有同时性 LBP 的患者的患者人口统计学、特征和 PRO-JOA 评分,并使用逻辑回归分析分析导致 LBP 达到 MCID 的因素。
共纳入 786 例连续的颈椎脊髓病患者,其中 525 例(67%)同时存在 LBP。LBP 与较高的体重指数(P<0.001)和较差的术前 PRO-JOA 评分(P<0.001)相关。在 525 例同时存在 LBP 的患者中,术后 NRS-LBP 平均值从 4.5±2.4 显著改善至 3.4±2.7(P<0.01),248 例(47%)患者达到 MCID 截止值。与恢复率<0%的患者相比,PRO-JOA 恢复率>50%的患者更有可能达到 MCID(调整后的优势比 4.02,P<0.001)。
超过 50%的脊髓病患者在颈椎手术后报告 LBP 改善,47%的患者达到 LBP 的 MCID,这与更好的 PRO-JOA 恢复率呈正相关。治疗伴有 LBP 的颈椎脊髓病患者可能足以减轻同时性 LBP。
III 级。