Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Department of Neurosurgery, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.
Clin Spine Surg. 2024 Oct 1;37(8):E389-E393. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001617. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
Level IV retrospective cohort study.
Despite the positive outcomes associated with laminoplasty, there is significant surgeon variability in the use of laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy in the United States. In this study, we explored how geographic and specialty-specific differences may influence the utilization of laminoplasty to treat cervical myelopathy.
We queried the Mariner 157 database (PearlDiver, Inc.), a national administrative claims database containing diagnostic, procedural, and demographic records from over 157 million patients from 2010 to 2021.
Using the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision/International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision and Current Procedural Terminology codes, we identified all patients with a diagnosis of cervical myelopathy who had undergone multilevel posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) or laminoplasty. We further analyzed patients' demographics, comorbidities, geographical location, and specialty of the surgeon (neurosurgery or orthopedic spine surgery).
There were 34,432 patients with a diagnosis of cervical myelopathy, of which 4,033 (11.7%) underwent laminoplasty and 30,399 (88.3%) underwent multilevel PCDF. Northeast, South, and West regions had lower percentages of laminoplasty utilization compared with the Midwest in terms of total case mix between laminoplasty and PCDF. In addition, 2,300 (57.0%) of the laminoplasty cases were performed by orthopedic spine surgeons compared with 1,733 (43.0%) by neurosurgeons. Temporal trends in laminoplasty utilization were stable for orthopedic surgeons, whereas laminoplasty utilization decreased over time between 2010 and 2021 for neurosurgeons (P < 0.001).
Utilization of laminoplasty in the United States is not well defined. Our results suggest a geographical and training-specific variation in the utilization of laminoplasty. Surgeons with orthopedic training were more likely to perform laminoplasty compared with surgeons with a neurosurgery training background. In addition, we found greater utilization of laminoplasty in the Midwest compared with other regions.
IV 级回顾性队列研究。
尽管椎板成形术带来了积极的结果,但在美国,医生在使用椎板成形术治疗颈椎脊髓病方面存在显著的差异。在这项研究中,我们探讨了地理和专业差异如何影响使用椎板成形术治疗颈椎脊髓病。
我们查询了 Mariner 157 数据库(PearlDiver,Inc.),这是一个国家管理索赔数据库,包含 2010 年至 2021 年来自超过 1.57 亿患者的诊断、程序和人口统计记录。
使用国际疾病分类第 10 版/国际疾病分类第 9 版和当前程序术语代码,我们确定了所有接受多节段颈椎后路减压融合术(PCDF)或椎板成形术治疗的颈椎脊髓病患者。我们进一步分析了患者的人口统计学、合并症、地理位置和外科医生的专业(神经外科或骨科脊柱外科)。
有 34432 例颈椎脊髓病患者,其中 4033 例(11.7%)接受了椎板成形术,30399 例(88.3%)接受了多节段 PCDF。与中西部相比,东北、南部和西部的总病例组合中椎板成形术的使用率较低,无论是与 PCDF 相比还是单独与 PCDF 相比。此外,2300 例(57.0%)椎板成形术由骨科脊柱外科医生完成,1733 例(43.0%)由神经外科医生完成。骨科医生的椎板成形术使用率呈稳定趋势,而神经外科医生的椎板成形术使用率在 2010 年至 2021 年间呈下降趋势(P<0.001)。
在美国,椎板成形术的使用情况并不明确。我们的结果表明,椎板成形术的使用存在地理和培训方面的差异。接受过骨科培训的外科医生比接受过神经外科培训背景的外科医生更有可能进行椎板成形术。此外,我们发现中西部地区比其他地区更广泛地使用椎板成形术。