Jonathan Geneva K, Abitante George, McBride Alyssa, Bernstein-Sandler Mary, Babington Pamela, Dopke Cynthia A, Rossom Rebecca C, Mohr David C, Goulding Evan H
Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Department of Psychological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
J Affect Disord. 2024 Apr 1;350:926-936. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.01.099. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
Understanding how individuals utilize and perceive digital mental health interventions may improve engagement and effectiveness. To support intervention improvement, participant feedback was obtained and app use patterns were examined for a randomized clinical trial evaluating a smartphone-based intervention for individuals with bipolar disorder.
App use and coaching engagement were examined (n = 124). Feedback was obtained via exit questionnaires (week 16, n = 81) and exit interviews (week 48, n = 17).
On average, over 48 weeks, participants used the app for 4.4 h and engaged with the coach for 3.9 h. Participants spent the most time monitoring target behaviors and receiving adaptive feedback and the least time viewing self-assessments and skills. Participants reported that the daily check in helped increase awareness of target behaviors but expressed frustration with repetitiveness of monitoring and feedback content. Participants liked personalizing their wellness plan, but its use did not facilitate skills practice. App use declined over time which participants attributed to clinical stability, content mastery, and time commitment. Participants found the coaching supportive and motivating for app use.
App engagement based on viewing time may overestimate engagement. The delay between intervention delivery and the exit interviews and low exit interview participation may introduce bias.
Utilization patterns and feedback suggest that digital mental health engagement and efficacy may benefit from adaptive personalization of targets monitored combined with adaptive monitoring and feedback to support skills practice and development. Increasing engagement with supports may also be beneficial.
了解个体如何使用和看待数字心理健康干预措施可能会提高参与度和有效性。为了支持干预措施的改进,在一项针对双相情感障碍患者的基于智能手机的干预措施的随机临床试验中,收集了参与者的反馈并研究了应用程序的使用模式。
对应用程序的使用情况和辅导参与度进行了研究(n = 124)。通过退出问卷(第16周,n = 81)和退出访谈(第48周,n = 17)获得反馈。
在48周的时间里,参与者平均使用该应用程序4.4小时,与辅导人员互动3.9小时。参与者花费最多的时间监测目标行为并接收适应性反馈,而花费最少的时间查看自我评估和技能。参与者报告说,每日签到有助于提高对目标行为的认识,但对监测和反馈内容的重复性表示沮丧。参与者喜欢个性化他们的健康计划,但使用该计划并没有促进技能练习。随着时间的推移,应用程序的使用量下降,参与者将其归因于临床稳定性、内容掌握程度和时间投入。参与者发现辅导对应用程序的使用有支持作用且具有激励性。
基于查看时间的应用程序参与度可能高估了参与度。干预实施与退出访谈之间的延迟以及退出访谈参与率低可能会引入偏差。
使用模式和反馈表明,数字心理健康的参与度和效果可能受益于对所监测目标的适应性个性化设置,以及结合适应性监测和反馈以支持技能练习和发展。增加对支持措施的参与度也可能有益。