Suppr超能文献

抽动障碍药理学试验中的安慰剂和反安慰剂反应:一项荟萃分析。

Placebo and Nocebo Responses in Pharmacological Trials of Tic Disorders: A Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Wang Simeng, Xiong Zhiyi, Cui Yuehua, Fan Fei, Zhang Si, Jia Ru, Hu Yuchen, Li Liang, Zhang Xuan, Han Fei

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Mov Disord. 2024 Mar;39(3):585-595. doi: 10.1002/mds.29714. Epub 2024 Jan 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials of new drugs for tic disorders (TD) often fail to yield positive results. Placebo and nocebo responses play a vital role in interpreting the outcomes of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), yet these responses in RCTs of TD remain unexplored.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to assess the magnitude of placebo and nocebo responses in RCTs of pharmacological interventions for TD and identify influencing factors.

METHODS

A systematic search of the Embase, Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO databases was conducted. Eligible studies were RCTs that compared active pharmacological agents with placebos. Placebo response was defined as the change from baseline in TD symptom severity in the placebo group, and nocebo response as the proportion experiencing adverse events (AEs) in this group. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to explore modifying factors.

RESULTS

Twenty-four trials involving 2222 participants were included in this study. A substantial placebo response in TD symptom severity was identified, with a pooled effect size of -0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.99 to -0.59; I = 67%). Forty-four percent (95% CI 27% to 63%; I = 92%) of patients experienced AEs while taking inert pills. Sample size, study design, and randomization ratio were correlated with changes in placebo and nocebo responses.

CONCLUSION

There were considerable placebo and nocebo responses in TD clinical trials. These results are of great relevance for the design of future trials and for clinical practice in TD.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration ID CRD42023388397. © 2024 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

摘要

背景

治疗抽动障碍(TD)的新药临床试验往往未能取得积极成果。安慰剂和反安慰剂反应在解释随机对照试验(RCT)结果方面起着至关重要的作用,但TD的RCT中的这些反应仍未得到探索。

目的

旨在评估TD药物干预RCT中安慰剂和反安慰剂反应的程度,并确定影响因素。

方法

对Embase、Medline、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库和PsycINFO数据库进行了系统检索。符合条件的研究是将活性药物与安慰剂进行比较的RCT。安慰剂反应定义为安慰剂组中TD症状严重程度相对于基线的变化,反安慰剂反应定义为该组中经历不良事件(AE)的比例。进行亚组分析和meta回归以探索修饰因素。

结果

本研究纳入了24项试验,涉及2222名参与者。在TD症状严重程度方面发现了显著的安慰剂反应,合并效应量为-0.79(95%置信区间[CI]-0.99至-0.59;I=67%)。44%(95%CI 27%至63%;I=92%)的患者在服用惰性药丸时出现了AE。样本量、研究设计和随机化比例与安慰剂和反安慰剂反应的变化相关。

结论

TD临床试验中存在相当大的安慰剂和反安慰剂反应。这些结果对于未来试验的设计和TD的临床实践具有重要意义。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO注册编号CRD42023388397。©2024作者。《运动障碍》由Wiley Periodicals LLC代表国际帕金森和运动障碍协会出版。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验