Mestermann Stefan, Kleinöder Jonas Markus, Arndt Marie, Krämer Josef, Eichler Anna, Kratz Oliver
Department of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Dec 22;14(1):13. doi: 10.3390/bs14010013.
Changes in parental roles have renewed the focus on a father's involvement in an offspring's psychological development. However, fathers are still under-represented in family research. There are only a few structured father-centered intervention programs in child and adolescent psychiatry. In a German population sample, a pilot father-centered family intervention program with n = 16 participants, conducted in person (n = 8) and online (n = 8), in a child and adolescent psychiatry inpatient/day clinic setting was evaluated by comparing paternal stress, PSE, and child-rated paternal competence in a pre-post design. Participating fathers showed significant decreases in child-related parenting stress (presence: = 0.042, online: = 0.047) and significant increases in PSE ( = 0.006/0.012). Parent-related stress and child-rated paternal competence were unaffected ( = 0.108/0.171; = 0.167/0.101), while small-to-medium effect size measures pointed in the direction of our hypothesis ( = 0.48/0.36; = 0.37/0.50). Participant satisfaction was higher in person than online ( = 0.008). As social and biological fathers have important influences on child and adolescent well-being and development, they should be included more frequently in prevention and intervention programs. Fathers seem to benefit from gender-specific intervention programs with regard to stress reduction, as well as experiencing competence- and PSE-increasing effects.
父母角色的变化使人们重新关注父亲在子女心理发展中的参与度。然而,在家庭研究中,父亲的代表性仍然不足。在儿童和青少年精神病学领域,只有少数以父亲为中心的结构化干预项目。在一个德国人群样本中,一项针对16名参与者的以父亲为中心的家庭干预试点项目,在儿童和青少年精神病学住院部/日间诊所环境中,分别通过面对面(n = 8)和在线(n = 8)的方式进行,采用前后设计对父亲的压力、育儿自我效能感(PSE)以及孩子评定的父亲能力进行了评估。参与项目的父亲在与孩子相关的育儿压力方面显著降低(面对面: = 0.042,在线: = 0.047),并且育儿自我效能感显著提高( = 0.006/0.012)。与父母相关的压力和孩子评定的父亲能力未受影响( = 0.108/0.171; = 0.167/0.101),而中等到小的效应量测量结果指向了我们假设的方向( = 0.48/0.36; = 0.37/0.50)。参与者的满意度面对面高于在线( = 0.008)。由于社会父亲和生物学父亲对儿童和青少年的幸福及发展有重要影响,他们应更频繁地被纳入预防和干预项目。父亲似乎从针对性别的干预项目中受益,在减轻压力方面如此,同时在体验能力提升和育儿自我效能感增强的效果方面也是如此。