Sansevere Kayla S, MacVicar Joel A, Samuels Daniel R, Yang Audrey K, Johnson Sara K, Brunyé Tad T, Ward Nathan
Department of Psychology, Tufts University, 490 Boston Ave., Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Eliot-Pearson Department of Child Study and Human Development, Tufts University, 105 College Ave., Medford, MA 02145, USA.
Brain Sci. 2024 Jan 17;14(1):87. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14010087.
Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) delivers low-intensity electrical currents to the brain to treat anxiety, depression, and pain. Though CES is considered safe and cost-effective, little is known about side effects emerging across different contexts. Our objective was to investigate how varying physical and cognitive demands impact the frequency and intensity of CES vestibular sensations in a sample of healthy young adults. We used a 2 (stimulation: sham, active) × 2 (physical demand: static sway, dynamic sit-to-stand) × 2 (cognitive demand: single-task remain silent, dual-task count backward) repeated measures design. Vestibular sensations were measured with surveys and wearable sensors capturing balance changes. Active stimulation did not influence reported vestibular sensations. Instead, high physical demand predicted more sensation reports. High cognitive demand, but not active stimulation, predicted postural sway unsteadiness. Significant effects of active stimulation on balance were observed only during the dynamic sit-to-stand transitions. In summary, CES induces vestibular sensations only for a specific outcome under certain circumstances. Our findings imply that consumers can safely maximize the benefits of CES while ensuring they are taking steps to minimize any potential side effects by considering their context and circumstances.
颅电刺激(CES)通过向大脑输送低强度电流来治疗焦虑、抑郁和疼痛。尽管CES被认为是安全且具有成本效益的,但对于在不同情况下出现的副作用却知之甚少。我们的目标是研究在健康的年轻成年人样本中,不同的身体和认知需求如何影响CES前庭感觉的频率和强度。我们采用了2(刺激:假刺激、主动刺激)×2(身体需求:静态摇摆、动态坐立)×2(认知需求:单任务保持沉默、双任务倒数)重复测量设计。通过调查和捕捉平衡变化的可穿戴传感器来测量前庭感觉。主动刺激并未影响所报告的前庭感觉。相反,高身体需求预示着更多的感觉报告。高认知需求而非主动刺激预示着姿势摇摆不稳定。仅在动态坐立转换期间观察到主动刺激对平衡有显著影响。总之,CES仅在特定情况下针对特定结果诱发前庭感觉。我们的研究结果表明,消费者可以在确保通过考虑自身情况和环境采取措施将任何潜在副作用降至最低的同时,安全地最大化CES的益处。