Bota Adrian Vasile, Bratosin Felix, Bogdan Iulia, Septimiu-Radu Susa, Ilie Adrian Cosmin, Burtic Sonia-Roxana, Razvan David Vladut, Tudor Raluca, Indries Mirela Florica, Csep Andrei Nicolae, Fildan Ariadna Petronela, Budea Camelia Melania, Marincu Iosif
Methodological and Infectious Diseases Research Center, Department of Infectious Diseases, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Square 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Doctoral School, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Square 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Diseases. 2024 Jan 11;12(1):21. doi: 10.3390/diseases12010021.
This longitudinal study investigates the psychosocial effects of long-COVID Syndrome, a domain still not extensively researched. It specifically evaluates the quality of life, coping mechanisms, anxiety and depression levels in COVID-19 survivors, differentiating between those with and without long-COVID Syndrome. Conducted at the Victor Babes Hospital for Infectious Diseases and Pulmonology in Timisoara, Romania, the study utilized a cohort of patients diagnosed with mild to moderate COVID-19. The following standardized tools: WHOQOL-BREF for quality of life, COPE-60 for coping strategies, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), were employed for the assessment. The sample consisted of 86 patients displaying persistent post-acute symptoms and 432 asymptomatic patients at the 6-month post-discharge mark. Patients with frequent post-acute symptoms reported significantly higher levels of fatigue (8.2 ± 1.4), cognitive difficulties (7.5 ± 1.6), and respiratory challenges (7.8 ± 1.3), along with a markedly lower overall quality of life (7.0 ± 1.5) compared to their asymptomatic counterparts. HADS scores revealed elevated depression (6.8 ± 1.9) and anxiety (7.1 ± 2.3) in the symptomatic group. Quality of life, as evaluated through the use of WHOQOL-BREF, showed lower scores in the symptomatic cohort across physical (58.8 ± 15.8), mental (56.3 ± 16.4), and social domains (50.2 ± 17.5). COPE-60 findings indicated a higher prevalence of disengagement (56.4%) and emotion-focused coping strategies (61.8%) in the symptomatic group, in contrast to 30.1% and 37.0%, respectively, in the asymptomatic group. The study highlights that long-COVID Syndrome significantly deteriorates the quality of life and is associated with increased depression and anxiety levels. The prevalent use of disengagement and emotion-focused coping strategies among patients with persistent symptoms suggests a need for enhanced psychosocial support tailored to this subgroup.
这项纵向研究调查了新冠后综合征的心理社会影响,这一领域仍未得到广泛研究。它具体评估了新冠病毒感染者康复后的生活质量、应对机制、焦虑和抑郁水平,区分了患有和未患有新冠后综合征的人群。该研究在罗马尼亚蒂米什瓦拉的维克托·巴比斯传染病与肺病医院进行,研究对象为一群被诊断患有轻至中度新冠病毒感染的患者。研究采用了以下标准化工具:用于评估生活质量的世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL-BREF)、用于评估应对策略的COPE-60以及医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)。样本包括86名出院6个月后仍有持续急性后症状的患者和432名无症状患者。与无症状患者相比,经常出现急性后症状的患者报告的疲劳程度(8.2±1.4)、认知困难程度(7.5±1.6)和呼吸问题程度(7.8±1.3)明显更高,总体生活质量(7.0±1.5)则明显更低。HADS评分显示,有症状组的抑郁(6.8±1.9)和焦虑(7.1±2.3)水平升高。通过WHOQOL-BREF评估的生活质量在有症状队列的身体(58.8±15.8)、心理(56.3±16.4)和社会领域(50.2±17.5)得分较低。COPE-60的研究结果表明,有症状组中脱离接触(56.4%)和以情绪为中心的应对策略(61.8%)的患病率更高,而无症状组的这一比例分别为30.1%和37.0%。该研究强调,新冠后综合征会显著降低生活质量,并与抑郁和焦虑水平升高有关。持续有症状的患者普遍采用脱离接触和以情绪为中心的应对策略,这表明需要为这一亚组提供强化的心理社会支持。