Miao Jing, Thongprayoon Charat, Suppadungsuk Supawadee, Garcia Valencia Oscar A, Qureshi Fawad, Cheungpasitporn Wisit
Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bang Phli 10540, Samut Prakan, Thailand.
Clin Pract. 2023 Dec 30;14(1):89-105. doi: 10.3390/clinpract14010008.
The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) has greatly propelled progress across various sectors including the field of nephrology academia. However, this advancement has also given rise to ethical challenges, notably in scholarly writing. AI's capacity to automate labor-intensive tasks like literature reviews and data analysis has created opportunities for unethical practices, with scholars incorporating AI-generated text into their manuscripts, potentially undermining academic integrity. This situation gives rise to a range of ethical dilemmas that not only question the authenticity of contemporary academic endeavors but also challenge the credibility of the peer-review process and the integrity of editorial oversight. Instances of this misconduct are highlighted, spanning from lesser-known journals to reputable ones, and even infiltrating graduate theses and grant applications. This subtle AI intrusion hints at a systemic vulnerability within the academic publishing domain, exacerbated by the publish-or-perish mentality. The solutions aimed at mitigating the unethical employment of AI in academia include the adoption of sophisticated AI-driven plagiarism detection systems, a robust augmentation of the peer-review process with an "AI scrutiny" phase, comprehensive training for academics on ethical AI usage, and the promotion of a culture of transparency that acknowledges AI's role in research. This review underscores the pressing need for collaborative efforts among academic nephrology institutions to foster an environment of ethical AI application, thus preserving the esteemed academic integrity in the face of rapid technological advancements. It also makes a plea for rigorous research to assess the extent of AI's involvement in the academic literature, evaluate the effectiveness of AI-enhanced plagiarism detection tools, and understand the long-term consequences of AI utilization on academic integrity. An example framework has been proposed to outline a comprehensive approach to integrating AI into Nephrology academic writing and peer review. Using proactive initiatives and rigorous evaluations, a harmonious environment that harnesses AI's capabilities while upholding stringent academic standards can be envisioned.
人工智能(AI)的出现极大地推动了包括肾脏病学学术领域在内的各个领域的发展。然而,这一进步也引发了伦理挑战,尤其是在学术写作方面。人工智能能够自动执行文献综述和数据分析等劳动密集型任务,这为不道德行为创造了机会,一些学者将人工智能生成的文本纳入其手稿中,这可能会损害学术诚信。这种情况引发了一系列伦理困境,这些困境不仅质疑当代学术努力的真实性,还挑战同行评审过程的可信度以及编辑监督的完整性。这种不当行为的例子比比皆是,从小众期刊到知名期刊,甚至渗透到研究生论文和资助申请中。这种微妙的人工智能入侵暗示了学术出版领域存在系统性漏洞,而“不发表就出局”的心态则加剧了这一问题。旨在减轻学术界人工智能不道德使用的解决方案包括采用先进的人工智能驱动的抄袭检测系统、在同行评审过程中增加一个“人工智能审查”阶段、对学者进行关于人工智能道德使用的全面培训,以及促进一种承认人工智能在研究中作用的透明文化。这篇综述强调了肾脏病学学术机构之间迫切需要共同努力,营造一个道德使用人工智能的环境,从而在快速的技术进步面前维护受人尊敬的学术诚信。它还呼吁进行严格的研究,以评估人工智能在学术文献中的参与程度,评估人工智能增强的抄袭检测工具的有效性,并了解人工智能使用对学术诚信的长期影响。本文提出了一个示例框架,概述了将人工智能整合到肾脏病学学术写作和同行评审中的综合方法。通过积极主动的举措和严格的评估,可以设想一个既能利用人工智能的能力又能坚持严格学术标准的和谐环境。
Account Res. 2024-9-18
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2023-6-1
Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2024-9-1
Curr Urol Rep. 2025-5-29
PLOS Digit Health. 2025-2-21
Healthcare (Basel). 2024-12-31
Contemp Clin Dent. 2024
Malays Fam Physician. 2023-11-28
World J Clin Cases. 2023-11-16
Medicines (Basel). 2023-10-20
Clin Pract. 2023-9-26
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024-1-1
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2023-9-30