文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

人工智能用于学术写作中的伦理困境以及肾脏病学术界同行评审的示例框架:一项叙述性综述

Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI for Academic Writing and an Example Framework for Peer Review in Nephrology Academia: A Narrative Review.

作者信息

Miao Jing, Thongprayoon Charat, Suppadungsuk Supawadee, Garcia Valencia Oscar A, Qureshi Fawad, Cheungpasitporn Wisit

机构信息

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bang Phli 10540, Samut Prakan, Thailand.

出版信息

Clin Pract. 2023 Dec 30;14(1):89-105. doi: 10.3390/clinpract14010008.


DOI:10.3390/clinpract14010008
PMID:38248432
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10801601/
Abstract

The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) has greatly propelled progress across various sectors including the field of nephrology academia. However, this advancement has also given rise to ethical challenges, notably in scholarly writing. AI's capacity to automate labor-intensive tasks like literature reviews and data analysis has created opportunities for unethical practices, with scholars incorporating AI-generated text into their manuscripts, potentially undermining academic integrity. This situation gives rise to a range of ethical dilemmas that not only question the authenticity of contemporary academic endeavors but also challenge the credibility of the peer-review process and the integrity of editorial oversight. Instances of this misconduct are highlighted, spanning from lesser-known journals to reputable ones, and even infiltrating graduate theses and grant applications. This subtle AI intrusion hints at a systemic vulnerability within the academic publishing domain, exacerbated by the publish-or-perish mentality. The solutions aimed at mitigating the unethical employment of AI in academia include the adoption of sophisticated AI-driven plagiarism detection systems, a robust augmentation of the peer-review process with an "AI scrutiny" phase, comprehensive training for academics on ethical AI usage, and the promotion of a culture of transparency that acknowledges AI's role in research. This review underscores the pressing need for collaborative efforts among academic nephrology institutions to foster an environment of ethical AI application, thus preserving the esteemed academic integrity in the face of rapid technological advancements. It also makes a plea for rigorous research to assess the extent of AI's involvement in the academic literature, evaluate the effectiveness of AI-enhanced plagiarism detection tools, and understand the long-term consequences of AI utilization on academic integrity. An example framework has been proposed to outline a comprehensive approach to integrating AI into Nephrology academic writing and peer review. Using proactive initiatives and rigorous evaluations, a harmonious environment that harnesses AI's capabilities while upholding stringent academic standards can be envisioned.

摘要

人工智能(AI)的出现极大地推动了包括肾脏病学学术领域在内的各个领域的发展。然而,这一进步也引发了伦理挑战,尤其是在学术写作方面。人工智能能够自动执行文献综述和数据分析等劳动密集型任务,这为不道德行为创造了机会,一些学者将人工智能生成的文本纳入其手稿中,这可能会损害学术诚信。这种情况引发了一系列伦理困境,这些困境不仅质疑当代学术努力的真实性,还挑战同行评审过程的可信度以及编辑监督的完整性。这种不当行为的例子比比皆是,从小众期刊到知名期刊,甚至渗透到研究生论文和资助申请中。这种微妙的人工智能入侵暗示了学术出版领域存在系统性漏洞,而“不发表就出局”的心态则加剧了这一问题。旨在减轻学术界人工智能不道德使用的解决方案包括采用先进的人工智能驱动的抄袭检测系统、在同行评审过程中增加一个“人工智能审查”阶段、对学者进行关于人工智能道德使用的全面培训,以及促进一种承认人工智能在研究中作用的透明文化。这篇综述强调了肾脏病学学术机构之间迫切需要共同努力,营造一个道德使用人工智能的环境,从而在快速的技术进步面前维护受人尊敬的学术诚信。它还呼吁进行严格的研究,以评估人工智能在学术文献中的参与程度,评估人工智能增强的抄袭检测工具的有效性,并了解人工智能使用对学术诚信的长期影响。本文提出了一个示例框架,概述了将人工智能整合到肾脏病学学术写作和同行评审中的综合方法。通过积极主动的举措和严格的评估,可以设想一个既能利用人工智能的能力又能坚持严格学术标准的和谐环境。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1212/10801601/f447ade88560/clinpract-14-00008-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1212/10801601/5f40bb85ee23/clinpract-14-00008-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1212/10801601/f447ade88560/clinpract-14-00008-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1212/10801601/5f40bb85ee23/clinpract-14-00008-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1212/10801601/f447ade88560/clinpract-14-00008-g002.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI for Academic Writing and an Example Framework for Peer Review in Nephrology Academia: A Narrative Review.

Clin Pract. 2023-12-30

[2]
Rising adoption of artificial intelligence in scientific publishing: evaluating the role, risks, and ethical implications in paper drafting and review process.

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2024-4-25

[3]
Beyond the Hype-The Actual Role and Risks of AI in Today's Medical Practice: Comparative-Approach Study.

JMIR AI. 2024-1-22

[4]
ChatGPT isn't an author, but a contribution taxonomy is needed.

Account Res. 2024-9-18

[5]
Guiding principles and proposed classification system for the responsible adoption of artificial intelligence in scientific writing in medicine.

Front Artif Intell. 2023-11-16

[6]
Fake academic writing: ethics during chatbot era.

Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2023-6-1

[7]
The relationship between personal and professional goals and emotional state in academia: a study on unethical use of artificial intelligence.

Front Psychol. 2024-3-27

[8]
Using AI Tools in Writing Peer Review Reports: Should Academic Journals Embrace the Use of ChatGPT?

Ann Biomed Eng. 2024-2

[9]
From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing.

Biol Sport. 2023-4

[10]
The transformative impact of large language models on medical writing and publishing: current applications, challenges and future directions.

Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2024-9-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
Artificial Intelligence Use in Medical Education: Best Practices and Future Directions.

Curr Urol Rep. 2025-5-29

[2]
AI in Neurology: Everything, Everywhere, all at Once PART 2: Speech, Sentience, Scruples, and Service.

Ann Neurol. 2025-9

[3]
Artificial intelligence as a tool for improving health literacy in kidney care.

PLOS Digit Health. 2025-2-21

[4]
Enhancing Patient Comprehension of Glomerular Disease Treatments Using ChatGPT.

Healthcare (Basel). 2024-12-31

[5]
Can ChatGPT Fool the Match? Artificial Intelligence Personal Statements for Plastic Surgery Residency Applications: A Comparative Study.

Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024-7-23

[6]
Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Advancing Medical Manuscript Composition: Applications and Ethical Considerations.

Cureus. 2024-10-17

[7]
Reflections on the “Ethics Guideline for using Generative Artificial Intelligence in Scientific Research and Publication Process of Higher Education Institutions”.

Balkan Med J. 2025-3-3

[8]
Decipher the Cipher.

Contemp Clin Dent. 2024

本文引用的文献

[1]
Should ChatGPT be considered a medical writer?

Malays Fam Physician. 2023-11-28

[2]
ChatGPT-4 and Human Researchers Are Equal in Writing Scientific Introduction Sections: A Blinded, Randomized, Non-inferiority Controlled Study.

Cureus. 2023-11-18

[3]
Chatbots, generative AI, and scholarly manuscripts: WAME recommendations on chatbots and generative artificial intelligence in relation to scholarly publications.

Colomb Med (Cali). 2023

[4]
Potential and limitations of ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence in medical safety education.

World J Clin Cases. 2023-11-16

[5]
Awareness and Use of ChatGPT and Large Language Models: A Prospective Cross-sectional Global Survey in Urology.

Eur Urol. 2024-2

[6]
Exploring the Potential of Chatbots in Critical Care Nephrology.

Medicines (Basel). 2023-10-20

[7]
AI-Powered Renal Diet Support: Performance of ChatGPT, Bard AI, and Bing Chat.

Clin Pract. 2023-9-26

[8]
Performance of ChatGPT on Nephrology Test Questions.

Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024-1-1

[9]
ChatGPT use shows that the grant-application system is broken.

Nature. 2023-11

[10]
ChatGPT: ethical concerns and challenges in academics and research.

J Infect Dev Ctries. 2023-9-30

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索