• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字心理健康干预:饮食文化干预框架的差异。

Digital Mental Health Interventions: Differences in Diet Culture Intervention Framing.

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.

College of Education and Human Development, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Dec 23;21(1):24. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21010024.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph21010024
PMID:38248489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10815398/
Abstract

Diet culture is a societal norm that ranks thin bodies as superior to other body types and has been associated with negative outcomes, such as eating disorders. Wellness has evolved into a term that is often used to promote diet culture messages. One possible way to combat diet culture is through single-session, digital mental health interventions (DMHIs), which allow for increased access to brief public health treatments. The framing of DMHIs is critical to ensure that the target population is reached. Participants ( = 397) were enrolled in a single-session DMHI, which was framed as either a ( = 201) or a ( = 196). Baseline group differences in eating disorder pathology, body image, weight stigma concerns, fat acceptance, and demographic characteristics were analyzed. Across groups, participants reported moderately high eating disorder pathology, low-to-moderate levels of body dissatisfaction, moderate levels of fat acceptance, and either very low or very high weight stigma concerns. Participants in the group reported higher levels of fat acceptance than those in the group ( < 0.001). No other framing group differences were identified, though post hoc analyses revealed differences based on recruitment source (i.e., social media versus undergraduate research portal). This study found that framing a DMHI as targeting diet culture or as a Wellness Resource can result in the successful recruitment of individuals at risk of disordered eating. Framing a DMHI as a may increase recruitment of individuals with low levels of fat acceptance, which may be particularly important for dismantling diet culture, disordered eating, and weight stigma concerns. Future research should assess DMHI framing in other populations, such as men and adolescents.

摘要

饮食文化是一种社会规范,将瘦体型视为优于其他体型的标准,并与饮食失调等负面结果相关联。健康已演变成一个常用术语,常被用来宣传饮食文化信息。对抗饮食文化的一种可能方法是通过单次、数字化心理健康干预(DMHI),这可以增加获得简短公共卫生治疗的机会。DMHI 的框架设计至关重要,以确保目标人群能够接收到信息。参与者(=397)被纳入单次 DMHI 干预中,该干预被设计为以饮食文化(=201)或健康资源(=196)为框架。分析了饮食失调病理、身体意象、体重污名化关注点、脂肪接受度和人口统计学特征方面的基线组间差异。在所有组中,参与者报告了中度高的饮食失调病理,低至中度的身体不满,中等水平的脂肪接受度,以及极低或极高的体重污名化关注点。与健康资源框架组相比,饮食文化框架组的参与者报告了更高水平的脂肪接受度(<0.001)。虽然事后分析显示了基于招募来源(即社交媒体与大学生研究门户)的差异,但没有发现其他框架组间差异。这项研究发现,将 DMHI 框架设计为针对饮食文化或作为健康资源可以成功招募有饮食失调风险的个体。将 DMHI 框架设计为饮食文化可能会增加对低脂肪接受度个体的招募,这对于打破饮食文化、饮食失调和体重污名化问题可能尤为重要。未来的研究应该在其他人群中评估 DMHI 的框架设计,例如男性和青少年。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9314/10815398/638de6aed351/ijerph-21-00024-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9314/10815398/638de6aed351/ijerph-21-00024-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9314/10815398/638de6aed351/ijerph-21-00024-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Digital Mental Health Interventions: Differences in Diet Culture Intervention Framing.数字心理健康干预:饮食文化干预框架的差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Dec 23;21(1):24. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21010024.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Interventions for preventing falls in older people in care facilities.护理机构中预防老年人跌倒的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 20;8:CD016064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016064.
4
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
5
Computer and mobile technology interventions for self-management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理的计算机和移动技术干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 23;5(5):CD011425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011425.pub2.
6
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
7
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
8
Providing Human Support for the Use of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Meta-review.提供数字心理健康干预措施使用的人力支持:系统元综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 6;25:e42864. doi: 10.2196/42864.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
10
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors, mediators, and moderators of response to digital interventions for eating disorders: A systematic review.预测因素、中介因素和调节因素对饮食障碍数字干预的反应:系统综述。
Int J Eat Disord. 2024 May;57(5):1034-1048. doi: 10.1002/eat.24078. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
2
The effects of brief diet and anti-diet social media videos on body image and eating concerns among young women.简短的饮食和反饮食社交媒体视频对年轻女性体像和饮食担忧的影响。
Eat Behav. 2023 Dec;51:101811. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2023.101811. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
3
Effects of Participant's Choice of Different Digital Interventions on Outcomes for Binge-Spectrum Eating Disorders: A Pilot Doubly Randomized Preference Trial.
不同数字干预措施对 binge-spectrum 饮食障碍结局影响的参与者选择:一项先导性双盲随机偏好试验。
Behav Ther. 2023 Mar;54(2):303-314. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2022.09.007. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
4
Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating -A Digital Gamified Acceptance and Commitment Early Intervention Program for Individuals at High Risk for Eating Disorders.评估针对饮食失调高危个体的数字游戏化接纳与承诺早期干预项目的随机临床试验
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 23;11(7):1775. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071775.
5
Trends in US Patients Receiving Care for Eating Disorders and Other Common Behavioral Health Conditions Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.美国在新冠疫情前后接受饮食失调和其他常见行为健康状况治疗的患者趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2134913. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.34913.
6
The Fat Acceptance Scale: Development and initial validation.肥胖接受度量表:编制与初步验证。
J Couns Psychol. 2022 Apr;69(3):311-325. doi: 10.1037/cou0000583. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
7
Promoting Graduate Student Mental Health During COVID-19: Acceptability, Feasibility, and Perceived Utility of an Online Single-Session Intervention.在新冠疫情期间促进研究生心理健康:一项在线单节干预措施的可接受性、可行性及感知效用
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 7;12:569785. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.569785. eCollection 2021.
8
Prevalence and correlates of weight bias internalization in weight management: A multinational study.体重管理中体重偏见内化的患病率及其相关因素:一项跨国研究。
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Feb 17;13:100755. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100755. eCollection 2021 Mar.
9
Implementation strategies for digital mental health interventions in health care settings.数字心理健康干预在医疗保健环境中的实施策略。
Am Psychol. 2020 Nov;75(8):1080-1092. doi: 10.1037/amp0000686.
10
The Influence of Three Modes of Human Support on Attrition and Adherence to a Web- and Mobile App-Based Mental Health Promotion Intervention in a Nonclinical Cohort: Randomized Comparative Study.三种人类支持模式对基于网络和移动应用的心理健康促进干预在非临床队列中脱落和坚持的影响:随机对照研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 29;22(9):e19945. doi: 10.2196/19945.