• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肥胖接受度量表:编制与初步验证。

The Fat Acceptance Scale: Development and initial validation.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Couns Psychol. 2022 Apr;69(3):311-325. doi: 10.1037/cou0000583. Epub 2021 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1037/cou0000583
PMID:34570537
Abstract

The fat acceptance movement arose to combat the widespread stigmatization of fatness and fat people through personal liberation and political activism. Support for the movement and its underlying ideology has grown rapidly over the past three decades; however, a self-report measure of fat acceptance with strong psychometric properties has not yet been developed. The current studies aimed to develop the Fat Acceptance Scale (FAS), a measure of fat-accepting beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors that was designed to be appropriate for use with people of all sizes. In Study 1, exploratory factor analysis ( = 266) and confirmatory factor analysis ( = 267) supported a three-factor solution assessing fat activism, health beliefs related to weight, and interpersonal respect for fat individuals. In Study 2 ( = 291), FAS scores predicted reactions to fictitious fat women after controlling for an established measure of antifat attitudes. Data from a subsample of 47 participants indicated moderate-to-high stability of the FAS over 4 weeks. In Study 3 ( = 156), health service psychology doctoral students' FAS scores predicted their reactions to a fictional fat psychotherapy client after controlling for antifat attitudes. Taken together, results provided preliminary evidence for the validity and reliability of FAS scores and suggest that the FAS may be a valuable tool for researchers, clinicians, and advocates interested in fat acceptance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

胖人接受运动旨在通过个人解放和政治行动主义来对抗对肥胖和胖人的普遍污名化。在过去的三十年中,人们对该运动及其潜在思想的支持迅速增长;然而,尚未开发出具有强大心理测量特性的胖人接受自我报告衡量标准。本研究旨在开发胖人接受量表(FAS),这是一种衡量胖人接受信念、态度和行为的工具,旨在适合所有体型的人使用。在研究 1 中,探索性因素分析(n=266)和验证性因素分析(n=267)支持了一个三因素解决方案,评估胖人活动、与体重相关的健康信念和对胖人的人际尊重。在研究 2(n=291)中,在控制针对反胖态度的既定衡量标准后,FAS 分数可预测对虚构胖女性的反应。来自 47 名参与者的子样本的数据表明,FAS 在 4 周内具有中等至高的稳定性。在研究 3(n=156)中,健康服务心理学博士生的 FAS 分数可预测他们对虚构胖心理治疗客户的反应,控制了反胖态度。综合来看,结果为 FAS 分数的有效性和可靠性提供了初步证据,并表明 FAS 可能是对胖人接受感兴趣的研究人员、临床医生和倡导者的有用工具。

相似文献

1
The Fat Acceptance Scale: Development and initial validation.肥胖接受度量表:编制与初步验证。
J Couns Psychol. 2022 Apr;69(3):311-325. doi: 10.1037/cou0000583. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
2
Weight Stigmatization among Physical Therapy Students and Registered Physical Therapists.物理治疗专业学生和注册物理治疗师中的体重歧视现象。
Obes Facts. 2020;13(2):104-116. doi: 10.1159/000504809. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
3
Stigmatizing attitudes towards people living with HIV/AIDS: validation of a measurement scale.对艾滋病毒/艾滋病感染者的污名化态度:一种测量量表的验证
BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 4;14:1246. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1246.
4
Development and validation of the Sociocultural Influences on Fear of Fat Scale (SI-FAT).社会文化因素对肥胖恐惧量表(SI-FAT)的编制与验证。
Body Image. 2021 Jun;37:181-187. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
5
Beyond the thin ideal: Development and validation of the Fit Ideal Internalization Test (FIIT) for women.超越瘦理想:女性 Fit 理想内化测试(FIIT)的开发和验证。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Feb;32(2):140-153. doi: 10.1037/pas0000773. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
6
French version of the Family Attitude Scale: psychometric properties and relation of attitudes to the respondent's psychiatric status.家庭态度量表的法译本:心理测量特性及其与被试者精神状况的关系。
Psychiatry Res. 2013 Dec 15;210(2):641-6. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.07.008. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
7
The Adaptation and Validation of the Trans Attitudes and Beliefs Scale to the Spanish Context.《跨性别态度与信念量表的西班牙情境适应与验证》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;19(7):4374. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074374.
8
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Frommelt Attitude Toward Care of the Dying Scale (FATCOD-B) among Italian medical students.意大利医学生中弗罗梅尔特临终关怀态度量表(FATCOD-B)的验证性因素分析。
Palliat Support Care. 2015 Oct;13(5):1391-8. doi: 10.1017/S1478951515000139. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
9
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS) in a large and representative Swedish sample: is the use of the total scale and subscale scores justified?基于大样本和代表性瑞典样本的证据为本实践态度量表(EBPAS)的验证性因子分析:使用总量表和分量表得分是否合理?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Oct 14;20(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01126-4.
10
Perceptions of childhood sexual abuse survivors: development and initial validation of a new scale to measure stereotypes of adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse.童年性虐待幸存者的认知:一种用于测量童年性虐待成年幸存者刻板印象的新量表的开发与初步验证
J Child Sex Abus. 2013;22(3):358-78. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2013.743955.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of the Gender Identity and Expression Microaggressions in Therapy Scale (GIEMTS).发展和验证治疗中的性别认同和表达微侵犯量表(GIEMTS)。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2024 Jun;61(2):110-124. doi: 10.1037/pst0000523. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
2
Digital Mental Health Interventions: Differences in Diet Culture Intervention Framing.数字心理健康干预:饮食文化干预框架的差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Dec 23;21(1):24. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21010024.