• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于项目特定和关系加工的学习反应性判断

Judgments of Learning Reactivity on Item-Specific and Relational Processing.

作者信息

Chang Minyu, Brainerd Charles

机构信息

Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada.

Department of Psychology and Human Neuroscience Institute, Cornell University, G331 MVR Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.

出版信息

J Intell. 2024 Jan 5;12(1):4. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12010004.

DOI:10.3390/jintelligence12010004
PMID:38248902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10817339/
Abstract

Judgments of learning (JOLs) reactivity refers to the finding that the mere solicitation of JOLs modifies subsequent memory performance. One theoretical explanation is the item-specific processing hypothesis, which posits that item-level JOLs redound to the benefit of later memory performance because they enhance item-specific processing. The current study was designed to test this account. We factorially manipulated the organization (blocked vs. randomized) of categorized lists and JOL condition (item-JOLs, list-JOLs, no-JOLs) between participants, and fit the dual-retrieval model to free recall data to pinpoint the underlying memory processes that were affected by JOL solicitation. Our results showed that item-level JOLs produced positive reactivity for randomized but not for blocked categorized lists. Moreover, we found that the positive JOL reactivity for randomized categorized lists was tied to a familiarity judgment process that is associated with gist processing, rather than to item-specific recollective processes. Thus, our results pose a challenge to the item-specific processing explanation of JOL reactivity. We argue that JOL reactivity is not restricted to item-specific processing; instead, whether JOLs predominantly engage participants with item-specific or relational processing depends on the interaction between learning stimuli and JOLs.

摘要

学习判断(JOLs)反应性是指这样一个发现:仅仅是对学习判断的诱导就会改变后续的记忆表现。一种理论解释是特定项目加工假说,该假说认为项目层面的学习判断有助于提高后续记忆表现,因为它们增强了特定项目的加工。本研究旨在验证这一观点。我们在参与者之间对分类列表的组织方式(分组呈现与随机呈现)和学习判断条件(项目学习判断、列表学习判断、无学习判断)进行了析因操纵,并将双检索模型应用于自由回忆数据,以确定受学习判断诱导影响的潜在记忆过程。我们的结果表明,项目层面的学习判断对随机呈现而非分组呈现的分类列表产生了积极的反应性。此外,我们发现随机呈现的分类列表的积极学习判断反应性与一个与要点加工相关的熟悉度判断过程有关,而不是与特定项目的回忆过程有关。因此,我们的结果对学习判断反应性的特定项目加工解释提出了挑战。我们认为,学习判断反应性并不局限于特定项目的加工;相反,学习判断主要促使参与者进行特定项目加工还是关系加工取决于学习刺激与学习判断之间的相互作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4a3/10817339/df4c488284d2/jintelligence-12-00004-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4a3/10817339/49e842982cbf/jintelligence-12-00004-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4a3/10817339/df4c488284d2/jintelligence-12-00004-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4a3/10817339/49e842982cbf/jintelligence-12-00004-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4a3/10817339/df4c488284d2/jintelligence-12-00004-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Judgments of Learning Reactivity on Item-Specific and Relational Processing.基于项目特定和关系加工的学习反应性判断
J Intell. 2024 Jan 5;12(1):4. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12010004.
2
Metamemory judgments and design effects: Judgment of learning (JOL) reactivity in free recall is affected by study list structure.元记忆判断与设计效应:自由回忆中的学习判断(JOL)反应性受学习列表结构的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Sep 23. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01638-0.
3
Making judgments of learning enhances memory by inducing item-specific processing.判断学习通过诱导项目特异性加工来增强记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Jul;49(5):955-967. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01133-2. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
4
Judgments of learning (JOLs) selectively improve memory depending on the type of test.学习判断(JOLs)可以根据测试类型有选择性地提高记忆效果。
Mem Cognit. 2020 Jul;48(5):745-758. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01025-5.
5
Reactivity from judgments of learning is not only due to memory forecasting: evidence from associative memory and frequency judgments.学习判断中的反应性不仅源于记忆预测:来自联想记忆和频率判断的证据。
Metacogn Learn. 2022;17(2):589-625. doi: 10.1007/s11409-022-09301-2. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
6
When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Displaced-JOL effect".当人们的学习判断(JOLs)在预测后续回忆方面极其准确时:“错位JOL效应” 。
Memory. 2018 Jul;26(6):771-783. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1406523. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
7
The font size effect depends on inter-item relation.字号大小效应取决于项目间关系。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Oct;51(7):1702-1713. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01419-1. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
8
Judgments of learning (JOLs) impact item memory but not source memory: Insights into JOL reactivity using a multinomial model.学习判断(JOLs)影响项目记忆但不影响来源记忆:使用多项式模型对JOL反应性的洞察。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2025 Jun;51(6):1004-1021. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001176. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
9
Does the reactivity effect of judgments of learning transfer to learning of new information?学习判断的反应性效应是否会转移到新信息的学习中?
Memory. 2023 Aug;31(7):918-930. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2023.2208792. Epub 2023 May 4.
10
Slow judgments of learning predict familiarity-based memories as measured by the remember-know task.缓慢的学习判断预测了基于熟悉度的记忆,如“记得-知道”任务所测量的那样。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Nov;48(11):1618-1637. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001067. Epub 2021 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Introduction to the Special Issue: Advances in Metacognition, Learning, and Reactivity.特刊引言:元认知、学习与反应性的进展
J Intell. 2025 Apr 9;13(4):46. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13040046.
2
Judgments of Learning Reactively Improve Memory by Enhancing Learning Engagement and Inducing Elaborative Processing: Evidence from an EEG Study.学习判断通过增强学习参与度和引发精细化加工来被动地改善记忆:一项脑电图研究的证据。
J Intell. 2024 Apr 9;12(4):44. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12040044.

本文引用的文献

1
Judgments of learning enhance recall for category-cued but not letter-cued items.学习判断增强了类别提示但不是字母提示项目的回忆。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Oct;51(7):1547-1561. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01417-3. Epub 2023 May 12.
2
Metamemory judgments have dissociable reactivity effects on item and interitem relational memory.元记忆判断对项目及项目间关系记忆具有可分离的反应性效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2023 Apr;49(4):557-574. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001160. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
3
Is discriminability a requirement for reactivity? Comparing the effects of mixed vs. pure list presentations on judgment of learning reactivity.
辨别力是否是反应性的要求?比较混合与纯列表呈现对学习反应性判断的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Jul;51(5):1198-1213. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01381-4. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
4
Judgments of learning reactively facilitate visual memory by enhancing learning engagement.学习的判断反应性地通过增强学习参与度来促进视觉记忆。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Apr;30(2):676-687. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02174-1. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
5
Why do judgments of learning modify memory? Evidence from identical pairs and relatedness judgments.为什么学习判断会改变记忆?来自相同对和关联性判断的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2023 Apr;49(4):547-556. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001174. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
6
Investigating memory reactivity with a within-participant manipulation of judgments of learning: support for the cue-strengthening hypothesis.通过对学习判断进行被试内操纵来探究记忆反应性:对线索强化假说的支持。
Memory. 2021 Nov;29(10):1342-1353. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1985143. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
7
Making judgments of learning enhances memory by inducing item-specific processing.判断学习通过诱导项目特异性加工来增强记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Jul;49(5):955-967. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01133-2. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
8
Judgments of learning (JOLs) selectively improve memory depending on the type of test.学习判断(JOLs)可以根据测试类型有选择性地提高记忆效果。
Mem Cognit. 2020 Jul;48(5):745-758. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01025-5.
9
Reactivity to Measures of Metacognition.对元认知测量的反应性。
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 6;10:2755. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02755. eCollection 2019.
10
Do judgments of learning modify older adults' actual learning?学习判断是否会改变老年人的实际学习情况?
Psychol Aging. 2019 Sep;34(6):836-847. doi: 10.1037/pag0000376. Epub 2019 Jul 1.