• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

字号大小效应取决于项目间关系。

The font size effect depends on inter-item relation.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, McGill University, 2001 Avenue McGill College, Montréal, QC, H3A 1G1, Canada.

Department of Psychology and Human Neuroscience Institute, Cornell University, Montréal, Canada.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2023 Oct;51(7):1702-1713. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01419-1. Epub 2023 Mar 30.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-023-01419-1
PMID:36995573
Abstract

The font size effect refers to the metacognitive illusion that larger fonts lead to higher judgments of learning (JOLs) but not better recall. Prior studies demonstrated robust JOL effects of font size under conditions of intra-item relation (i.e., cue-target relatedness within a word pair), even though intra-item relation is a more diagnostic cue than font size. However, it remains an open question whether the JOL effects of font size persist under conditions of inter-item relation (i.e., relations across items on a single-word list). In the current study, we examined the JOL and recall effects of font size when font size and inter-item relation were factorially manipulated in three JOL-recall experiments. Additionally, to manipulate the salience of inter-item relation, we presented related and unrelated lists in a blocked manner in Experiment 1 but in a mixed manner in Experiments 2 and 3. Our results showed that the JOL effects of font size are moderated or eliminated when inter-item relation is manipulated simultaneously with font size. Moreover, the smaller font led to better recall for related lists but not for unrelated lists across all three experiments. Therefore, our results demonstrate that individual cues may not be integrated with equal weight, and there can be a trade-off between item-specific and relational processing during the JOL process. Additionally, highlighting key information with larger fonts may not be optimal with related items.

摘要

字号大小效应是指一种元认知错觉,即较大的字号会导致更高的学习判断(JOL),但不会带来更好的回忆。先前的研究表明,即使字号大小是比项目内关系更具诊断性的线索,但在项目内关系条件下,字号大小仍会产生强烈的 JOL 效应,即词对中提示与目标的相关性。然而,字号大小的 JOL 效应是否在项目间关系条件下(即在单字列表上的项目之间的关系)持续存在,这仍是一个悬而未决的问题。在本研究中,我们通过三个 JOL 回忆实验,在因子上操纵字号大小和项目间关系,检验了字号大小的 JOL 和回忆效应。此外,为了操纵项目间关系的显著性,我们在实验 1 中以块的方式呈现相关和不相关的列表,而在实验 2 和 3 中以混合的方式呈现。我们的结果表明,当同时操纵字号大小和项目间关系时,字号大小的 JOL 效应会受到调节或消除。此外,在所有三个实验中,对于相关列表,较小的字号会导致更好的回忆,但对于不相关列表则并非如此。因此,我们的结果表明,个体线索可能不会以相同的权重进行整合,并且在 JOL 过程中可能存在项目特定处理和关系处理之间的权衡。此外,用较大的字号突出显示关键信息对于相关项目来说可能并不是最佳选择。

相似文献

1
The font size effect depends on inter-item relation.字号大小效应取决于项目间关系。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Oct;51(7):1702-1713. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01419-1. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
2
The effect of emotional valence and font size on metacognition and memory.情绪效价和字体大小对元认知和记忆的影响。
Memory. 2024 Feb;32(2):252-263. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2024.2307919. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
3
Judgments of Learning in Context: Backgrounds Can Both Reduce and Produce Metamemory Illusions.情境学习判断:背景既可以减少也可以产生元记忆错觉。
Mem Cognit. 2020 May;48(4):581-595. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00991-9.
4
Intensifying the intensity illusion in judgments of learning: Modality and cue combinations.增强学习判断中的强度错觉:模态与线索组合
Mem Cognit. 2019 Apr;47(3):412-419. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0875-8.
5
Can very small font size enhance memory?非常小的字体能增强记忆力吗?
Mem Cognit. 2018 Aug;46(6):979-993. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0816-6.
6
Influence of cue word perceptual information on metamemory accuracy in judgement of learning.线索词知觉信息对学习判断中元记忆准确性的影响。
Memory. 2016;24(3):383-98. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1009470. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
7
How font size affects judgments of learning: Simultaneous mediating effect of item-specific beliefs about fluency and moderating effect of beliefs about font size and memory.字号如何影响学习判断:流畅性的项目特定信念的同时中介作用和字号与记忆信念的调节作用。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 20;13(7):e0200888. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200888. eCollection 2018.
8
Do Judgments of Learning Impair Recall When Uninformative Cues Are Salient?当无信息线索显著时,学习判断会影响回忆吗?
J Intell. 2023 Oct 23;11(10):203. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11100203.
9
Perceptual contrast reduces the judgments of learning of small-font words and increases the judgments of learning of large-font words compared with the no-contrast conditions.与无对比条件相比,感知对比会降低小字体单词的学习判断,而增加大字体单词的学习判断。
Psych J. 2023 Oct;12(5):670-679. doi: 10.1002/pchj.679. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
10
Judgments of Learning Reactivity on Item-Specific and Relational Processing.基于项目特定和关系加工的学习反应性判断
J Intell. 2024 Jan 5;12(1):4. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12010004.

引用本文的文献

1
The perceived importance of words in large font guides learning and selective memory.大字呈现的单词的感知重要性指导学习和选择性记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Oct;52(7):1463-1476. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01555-2. Epub 2024 Apr 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Distinctive Sans Forgetica font does not benefit memory accuracy in the DRM paradigm.独特无遗忘字体不会提高 DRM 范式中的记忆准确性。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Dec 9;7(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00448-9.
2
Association and dissociation between judgments of learning and memory: A Meta-analysis of the font size effect.学习判断与记忆之间的关联与分离:字体大小效应的元分析
Metacogn Learn. 2022;17(2):443-476. doi: 10.1007/s11409-021-09287-3. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
3
The contribution of metamemory beliefs to the font size effect on judgments of learning: Is word frequency a moderating factor?
元记忆信念对字体大小效应对学习判断的影响:词频是一个调节因素吗?
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 20;16(9):e0257547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257547. eCollection 2021.
4
Disfluent difficulties are not desirable difficulties: the (lack of) effect of Sans Forgetica on memory.不流畅的困难并不是理想的困难:Sans Forgetica 对记忆的(缺乏)影响。
Memory. 2020 Aug;28(7):850-857. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2020.1758726. Epub 2020 May 4.
5
Metamemory and memory for a wide range of font sizes: What is the contribution of perceptual fluency?元记忆与对多种字体大小的记忆:知觉流畅性有何作用?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Jan;45(1):97-109. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000571. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
6
Perceptual blurring and recognition memory: A desirable difficulty effect revealed.知觉模糊与识别记忆:一种理想的困难效应被揭示。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Sep;160:11-22. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.06.006. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
7
Influence of cue word perceptual information on metamemory accuracy in judgement of learning.线索词知觉信息对学习判断中元记忆准确性的影响。
Memory. 2016;24(3):383-98. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1009470. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
8
Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas.四万常见英语单词词素的具体性等级评定。
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Sep;46(3):904-11. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5.
9
The ease-of-processing heuristic and the stability bias: dissociating memory, memory beliefs, and memory judgments.加工容易性启发式和稳定性偏差:记忆、记忆信念和记忆判断的分离。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jun;22(6):787-94. doi: 10.1177/0956797611407929. Epub 2011 May 6.
10
False recall in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm: The roles of gist and associative strength.在迪斯-罗迪格-麦克德莫特范式中的错误回忆:主旨和联想强度的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Aug;64(8):1515-42. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.560272. Epub 2011 Jun 24.