Aoki Masanori, Watanabe Noriyuki, Taji Yoshitada, Ebihara Yasuhiro
Clinical Laboratory, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, JPN.
Laboratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, JPN.
Cureus. 2023 Dec 20;15(12):e50857. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50857. eCollection 2023 Dec.
Background Bloodstream infection (BSI) induces a change in the number and morphology of blood cells. In this study, we compared cell population data (CPD) parameters between cancer patients with or without BSI to determine whether these parameters could serve as biomarkers of BSI. Methods Between April and June 2021, 43 BSI-negative and 22 BSI-positive cancer patients were enrolled in this study. We compared 18 CPD parameters and biomarkers between cancer patients with BSI-positive and BSI-negative. Results There were significant differences in the levels of several CPD parameters, including MO-WZ (p=0.040), MO-X (p<0.01), MO-Y (p=0.012), NE-SFL (p<0.01), and NE-WX (p=0.037), but not C-reactive protein (p=0.347) and procalcitonin (p=0.237) between BSI-positive and BSI-negative patients. The areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were above 0.7 for MO-X (0.762; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.624-0.901), NE-SFL (0.766; 95% CI: 0.625-0.880). And LY-WY (p=0.024) showed a significant difference between gram-negative and gram-positive BSI patients with high AUC (0.883; 95% CI: 0.703-1). Conclusion CPD parameters (MO-X and NE-SFL) provide additional information for discriminating between BSI-negative and BSI-positive BSI. And LY-WY provides useful information for discriminating between cancer patients with gram-negative BSI and gram-positive BSI.
背景 血流感染(BSI)会导致血细胞数量和形态发生变化。在本研究中,我们比较了有或无BSI的癌症患者之间的细胞群体数据(CPD)参数,以确定这些参数是否可作为BSI的生物标志物。方法 2021年4月至6月,本研究纳入了43例BSI阴性和22例BSI阳性的癌症患者。我们比较了BSI阳性和BSI阴性癌症患者之间的18项CPD参数和生物标志物。结果 BSI阳性和BSI阴性患者之间的几个CPD参数水平存在显著差异,包括MO-WZ(p = 0.040)、MO-X(p < 0.01)、MO-Y(p = 0.012)、NE-SFL(p < 0.01)和NE-WX(p = 0.037),但C反应蛋白(p = 0.347)和降钙素原(p = 0.237)无显著差异。MO-X(0.762;95%置信区间(CI):0.624 - 0.901)、NE-SFL(0.766;95%CI:0.625 - 0.880)的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)大于0.7。并且LY-WY(p = 0.024)在革兰氏阴性和革兰氏阳性BSI患者之间显示出显著差异,AUC较高(0.883;95%CI:0.703 - 1)。结论 CPD参数(MO-X和NE-SFL)为区分BSI阴性和BSI阳性BSI提供了额外信息。并且LY-WY为区分革兰氏阴性BSI和革兰氏阳性BSI的癌症患者提供了有用信息。