Gilchrist R, Kholvadia A
Department of Human Movement Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha, South Africa, 6001.
S Afr J Sports Med. 2023 May 9;35(1):v35i1a15260. doi: 10.17159/2078-516X/2023/v35i1a15260. eCollection 2023.
The rehabilitative nature of biokinetics and physiotherapy in osteoarthritis management highlights a complex interaction between different professions to achieve effective outcomes for the patient. The success of a team approach is dependent on key competencies for optimal patient-focused care and appropriate cross-referral systems.
To explore and describe the viewpoints of biokineticists and physiotherapists regarding a team approach to osteoarthritis management in the South African public and private healthcare setting.
A descriptive methodology with a convenience sampling technique was used. The target population consisted of biokineticists (n=47) and physiotherapists (n=165) located within the South African healthcare sectors. A self-administered, online questionnaire surveyed rehabilitative professionals' views of a team approach to osteoarthritis management.
There is no evidence that the biokineticists and physiotherapists differ with respect to how they rate the communication between team members in osteoarthritis management (p=0.68). Communication was viewed as neither of a high nor low quality by biokineticists (43%) and physiotherapists (36%). Biokineticists (54%) and physiotherapists (69%) felt adequately equipped on their understanding of the role of various healthcare professions involved in osteoarthritis management (p=0.22). However, 43% of rehabilitative professionals indicated that they had not been exposed to interprofessional education initiatives (p=0.61).
Both professions were well-versed on the roles of various professions involved in osteoarthritis management, however, communication was not optimal. While this study creates an awareness of the benefits of team-based management for osteoarthritis, the findings could stimulate debate on the optimal implementation of key competencies required for effective teamwork, thereby facilitating patient-focused care and referral systems.
生物动力学和物理治疗在骨关节炎管理中的康复性质凸显了不同专业之间为实现患者有效治疗效果而进行的复杂互动。团队协作方法的成功取决于以患者为中心的最佳护理所需的关键能力以及适当的交叉转诊系统。
探讨并描述生物动力学治疗师和物理治疗师对于南非公共和私立医疗环境中骨关节炎管理团队协作方法的观点。
采用描述性方法和便利抽样技术。目标人群包括南非医疗部门的生物动力学治疗师(n = 47)和物理治疗师(n = 165)。通过一份自我管理的在线问卷,调查康复专业人员对骨关节炎管理团队协作方法的看法。
没有证据表明生物动力学治疗师和物理治疗师在对骨关节炎管理中团队成员间沟通的评价方面存在差异(p = 0.68)。生物动力学治疗师(43%)和物理治疗师(36%)认为沟通质量既不高也不低。生物动力学治疗师(54%)和物理治疗师(69%)觉得自己对参与骨关节炎管理的各种医疗专业的作用有足够的了解(p = 0.22)。然而,43%的康复专业人员表示他们没有参与过跨专业教育项目(p = 0.61)。
两个专业都熟知参与骨关节炎管理的各种专业的角色,然而,沟通并非最佳。虽然本研究提高了对基于团队的骨关节炎管理益处的认识,但研究结果可能引发关于有效团队合作所需关键能力的最佳实施的讨论,从而促进以患者为中心的护理和转诊系统。