Abraham Abey S, Elliott Connor W, Abraham Matthew S, Ahuja Sanchit
Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.
School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Dec 30;15(12):7042-7049. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1101. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
Myocardial protection involves limiting the metabolic activity and oxygen consumption of the heart, thus enabling surgery to proceed with minimal blood loss while reducing the level of ischemic injury. It was this concept that allowed for the development of the open-heart surgical technique. We know myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury are both detrimental, thus developing strategies to mitigate this can help reduce peri-operative morbidity and mortality. In this review, we will mainly be addressing the anesthetic considerations for myocardial protection, along with discussing potential future research which can help expand the field.
We searched the PubMed database for relevant studies dating from 2004-2022. In total, 18 studies were deemed suitable for this literature review.
Studies have demonstrated cardioprotective effects with use of the volatile agents and propofol, mainly with respect to lower levels of inflammatory markers such as creatine kinase (CK)-MB and troponin I (TnI)/troponin T (TnT). The data is lacking regarding protective effects of dexmedetomidine and lidocaine, hence we cannot recommend either agent at present.
Myocardial protection with respect to the anesthetic agents have been extensively studied over the past two decades, some routinely used drugs such as the volatile agents, propofol and opiates have demonstrated a cardioprotective role. The ideal dosing regimen and duration are areas of research that can be studied further. The data for the other anesthetic adjuncts such as lidocaine, dexmedetomidine along with use of regional anesthesia is still equivocal. Alongside advances in anesthesia, we believe surgical research looking into optimal cardioplegia solutions will also help improve myocardial protection in the future.
心肌保护包括限制心脏的代谢活动和氧消耗,从而使手术能够在失血最少的情况下进行,同时降低缺血损伤水平。正是这一概念推动了心脏直视手术技术的发展。我们知道心肌缺血和再灌注损伤都是有害的,因此制定减轻这种损伤的策略有助于降低围手术期发病率和死亡率。在本综述中,我们将主要探讨心肌保护的麻醉相关考虑因素,并讨论有助于拓展该领域的潜在未来研究。
我们在PubMed数据库中搜索了2004年至2022年的相关研究。总共18项研究被认为适合本综述。
研究表明,使用挥发性麻醉剂和丙泊酚具有心脏保护作用,主要体现在降低肌酸激酶(CK)-MB和肌钙蛋白I(TnI)/肌钙蛋白T(TnT)等炎症标志物水平方面。关于右美托咪定和利多卡因的保护作用的数据不足,因此我们目前无法推荐使用这两种药物。
在过去二十年中,对麻醉药物的心肌保护作用进行了广泛研究,一些常用药物如挥发性麻醉剂、丙泊酚和阿片类药物已显示出心脏保护作用。理想的给药方案和持续时间是可以进一步研究的领域。其他麻醉辅助药物如利多卡因、右美托咪定以及区域麻醉的使用数据仍不明确。随着麻醉技术的进步,我们相信研究最佳心脏停搏液解决方案的外科研究也将有助于未来改善心肌保护。