• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国糖尿病和非糖尿病严重肢体缺血患者下肢搭桥手术的长期预后

Long-Term Outcome of Lower Extremity Bypass Surgery in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients with Critical Limb-Threatening Ischaemia in Germany.

作者信息

Surmann Johanna, Meyer Philipp, Epple Jasmin, Schmitz-Rixen Thomas, Böckler Dittmar, Grundmann Reinhart T

机构信息

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt am Main, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

出版信息

Biomedicines. 2023 Dec 22;12(1):38. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12010038.

DOI:10.3390/biomedicines12010038
PMID:38255145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10813329/
Abstract

AIM

To present the short- and long-term outcomes of lower extremity bypass (LEB) surgery in patients with critical limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI), comparing diabetic (DM) and non-diabetic (non-DM) patients.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of anonymised data from a nationwide health insurance company (AOK). Data from 22,633 patients (DM: = 7266; non-DM: = 15,367; men: = 14,523; women: = 8110; mean patient age: 72.5 years), who underwent LEB from 2010 to 2015, were analysed. The cut-off date for follow-up was December 31, 2018 (mean follow-up period: 55 months).

RESULTS

Perioperative mortality was 10.0% for DM and 8.2% for non-DM ( < 0.001). Patients with crural/pedal bypasses ( = 8558) had a significantly higher perioperative mortality (10.3%) than those with above-the-knee ( = 7246; 5.8%; < 0.001) and below-the-knee bypasses ( = 6829; 8.9%; = 0.003). The 9-year survival rates in DM patients were significantly worse, at 21.5%, compared to non-DM, at 31.1% ( < 0.001). This applied to both PAD stage III (DM: 34.4%; non-DM: 45.7%; < 0.001) and PAD stage IV (DM: 18.5%; non-DM: 25.0%; < 0.001). Patients with crural/pedal bypasses had a significantly inferior survival rate (25.5%) compared to those with below-the-knee (27.7%; < 0.001) and above-the-knee bypasses (31.7%; < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Perioperative and long-term outcomes regarding survival and major amputation rate for CLTI patients undergoing LEB are consistently worse for DM patients compared to non-DM patients.

摘要

目的

呈现下肢旁路移植术(LEB)治疗严重肢体缺血(CLTI)患者的短期和长期结果,比较糖尿病(DM)患者和非糖尿病(非DM)患者。

方法

对一家全国性健康保险公司(AOK)的匿名数据进行回顾性分析。分析了2010年至2015年期间接受LEB手术的22633例患者的数据(DM患者:7266例;非DM患者:15367例;男性:14523例;女性:8110例;患者平均年龄:72.5岁)。随访截止日期为2018年12月31日(平均随访期:55个月)。

结果

DM患者围手术期死亡率为10.0%,非DM患者为8.2%(P<0.001)。行小腿/足部旁路移植术的患者(8558例)围手术期死亡率(10.3%)显著高于膝上旁路移植术患者(7246例;5.8%;P<0.001)和膝下旁路移植术患者(6829例;8.9%;P=0.003)。DM患者的9年生存率显著低于非DM患者,分别为21.5%和31.1%(P<0.001)。这在下肢动脉硬化闭塞症(PAD)III期(DM患者:34.4%;非DM患者:45.7%;P<0.001)和PAD IV期(DM患者:18.5%;非DM患者:25.0%;P<0.001)均如此。与膝下旁路移植术患者(27.7%;P<0.001)和膝上旁路移植术患者(31.7%;P<0.001)相比,行小腿/足部旁路移植术的患者生存率显著更低(25.5%)。

结论

与非DM患者相比,接受LEB手术的CLTI患者在围手术期及生存和大截肢率方面的长期结果,DM患者始终更差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd41/10813329/5596d6caaa0b/biomedicines-12-00038-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd41/10813329/7ce7eaf46081/biomedicines-12-00038-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd41/10813329/5596d6caaa0b/biomedicines-12-00038-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd41/10813329/7ce7eaf46081/biomedicines-12-00038-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd41/10813329/5596d6caaa0b/biomedicines-12-00038-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-Term Outcome of Lower Extremity Bypass Surgery in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients with Critical Limb-Threatening Ischaemia in Germany.德国糖尿病和非糖尿病严重肢体缺血患者下肢搭桥手术的长期预后
Biomedicines. 2023 Dec 22;12(1):38. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12010038.
2
Critical chronic peripheral arterial disease: does outcome justify crural or pedal bypass surgery in patients with advanced age or with comorbidities?严重慢性外周动脉疾病:对于高龄或患有合并症的患者,小腿或足部搭桥手术的疗效是否合理?
Ann Vasc Surg. 2011 Aug;25(6):783-95. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2011.01.008. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
3
Diabetes does not worsen outcomes following infrageniculate bypass or endovascular intervention for patients with critical limb ischemia.对于严重肢体缺血患者,糖尿病并不会使膝下旁路移植术或血管内介入治疗的预后恶化。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Dec;64(6):1667-1674.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.07.107.
4
Long-term Outcomes of an Endovascular-First Approach for Diabetic Patients With Predominantly Tibial Disease Treated in a Multidisciplinary Setting.多学科背景下主要针对胫部疾病的糖尿病患者采用血管腔内治疗优先策略的长期疗效
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Oct;60:315-326.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
5
Results of peripheral bypass surgery in patients with critical limb ischemia (CRITISCH registry).严重肢体缺血患者的外周血管搭桥手术结果(CRITISCH注册研究)
Gefasschirurgie. 2016;21(Suppl 2):71-79. doi: 10.1007/s00772-016-0166-2. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
6
Interplay of Diabetes Mellitus and End-Stage Renal Disease in Open Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.糖尿病与终末期肾病在慢性肢体威胁性缺血开放血运重建中的相互作用。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Apr;72:552-562. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
7
High-intensity statin therapy reduces risk of amputation and reintervention among patients undergoing lower extremity bypass for chronic limb-threatening ischemia.高强度他汀类药物治疗可降低因慢性肢体威胁性缺血接受下肢搭桥手术患者的截肢和再次干预风险。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Feb;77(2):497-505. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.09.007. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
8
A vein bypass first versus a best endovascular treatment first revascularisation strategy for patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia who required an infra-popliteal, with or without an additional more proximal infra-inguinal revascularisation procedure to restore limb perfusion (BASIL-2): an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial.对于需要进行 below-the-knee(小腿)、伴或不伴额外更近端 below-inguinal(腹股沟下)血运重建以恢复肢体灌注的慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者,静脉旁路优先与最佳血管内治疗优先再血管化策略的比较(BASIL-2):一项开放标签、随机、多中心、3 期试验。
Lancet. 2023 May 27;401(10390):1798-1809. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00462-2. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
9
Comparison of Immediate and Long-term Outcomes in Men and Women Undergoing Revascularisation for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia in the Bypass vs. Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL-1) Trial.在 Bypass vs. Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg(BASIL-1)试验中,比较慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者血管重建治疗中男性和女性的即刻和长期结局。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Aug;58(2):224-228. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
10
Revascularisation of Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia in Patients with no Pedal Arteries Leads to Lower Midterm Limb Salvage.慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者的血运重建导致中期下肢保肢率降低。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Jun;65(6):878-886. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.03.043. Epub 2023 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical outcomes of endovascular treatment in hemodialysis patients with central venous stenosis: A retrospective analysis.血液透析患者中心静脉狭窄血管内治疗的临床结局:一项回顾性分析。
Ther Apher Dial. 2025 Jun;29(3):408-418. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.14249. Epub 2025 Feb 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Frailty in People with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia and Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review.慢性肢体威胁性缺血合并糖尿病相关足部溃疡患者的衰弱:系统评价。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Feb;89:322-337. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.09.057. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
2
Diabetes mellitus was not associated with lower amputation-free survival after open revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia - A nationwide propensity score adjusted analysis.糖尿病与慢性肢体威胁性缺血开放血运重建后的无截肢生存率降低无关 - 全国倾向评分调整分析。
Vasc Med. 2021 Oct;26(5):507-514. doi: 10.1177/1358863X211008249. Epub 2021 May 18.
3
Contemporary Revascularization Strategies and Outcomes Among Patients With Diabetes With Critical Limb Ischemia: Insights From the National Inpatient Sample.
糖尿病合并严重肢体缺血患者的当代血运重建策略及结局:来自全国住院患者样本的见解
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Mar 22;14(6):664-674. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.11.032. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
4
Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes After Revascularization in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: Results From a Prospective National Cohort Study (RIVALUTANDO).慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者血运重建后的临床结局评估:一项前瞻性全国队列研究(RIVALUTANDO)的结果。
Angiology. 2021 May;72(5):480-489. doi: 10.1177/0003319720980619. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
5
Poor glycemic control is associated with significant increase in major limb amputation and adverse events in the 30-day postoperative period after infrainguinal bypass.血糖控制不佳与 30 天内大肢体截肢和不良事件的显著增加相关,且这些事件发生在下肢旁路手术后。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Sep;72(3):987-994. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.11.048. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
6
Preoperative hemoglobin A1c levels and increased risk of adverse limb events in diabetic patients undergoing infrainguinal lower extremity bypass surgery in the Vascular Quality Initiative.血管质量倡议研究中,术前糖化血红蛋白水平与糖尿病患者行下肢动脉旁路术时不良肢体事件风险增加的关系。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Oct;70(4):1225-1234.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.12.041. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
7
Outcomes after first-time lower extremity revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia between patients with and without diabetes.糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者初次下肢血运重建治疗慢性肢体严重缺血的结局。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Apr;67(4):1159-1169. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.06.119. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
8
Effect of diabetes mellitus on the clinical outcome of lower limb arterial bypass surgery: A propensity score analysis.糖尿病对下肢动脉搭桥手术临床结局的影响:一项倾向评分分析。
Vascular. 2017 Aug;25(4):364-371. doi: 10.1177/1708538116682911. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
9
Diabetes does not worsen outcomes following infrageniculate bypass or endovascular intervention for patients with critical limb ischemia.对于严重肢体缺血患者,糖尿病并不会使膝下旁路移植术或血管内介入治疗的预后恶化。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Dec;64(6):1667-1674.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.07.107.
10
Amputations and mortality in in-hospital treated patients with peripheral artery disease and diabetic foot syndrome.住院治疗的外周动脉疾病和糖尿病足综合征患者的截肢情况及死亡率
J Diabetes Complications. 2016 Aug;30(6):1117-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.03.033. Epub 2016 Apr 4.