Center for Health Inclusion, Research and Practice (CHIRP), Department of Nutrition and Public Health, Merrimack College, 315 Turnpike Street, North Andover, MA 01845, USA.
Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Nutrients. 2024 Jan 17;16(2):275. doi: 10.3390/nu16020275.
Snacks and beverages are often sold in addition to meals in U.S. schools ("competitive foods"), but their current nutritional quality and compliance with national Smart Snacks standards are unknown. This study assessed competitive foods in a national sample of 90 middle and high schools. Differences in compliance by school characteristics were measured using mixed methods analysis of variance. Overall, 80% of the schools in the sample sold competitive foods; but they were less commonly available in schools with universal free school meal (UFSM) policies. A total of 840 unique products were documented and, on average, 75% were compliant with Smart Snacks standards. A total of 56% aligned with recommended added sugar limits (<10% of calories); and 340 unique products (40%) aligned with both sugar and Smart Snacks standards. Approximately one-fifth of competitive foods contained synthetic dyes, and 31% of beverages contained artificial sweeteners. Smart Snacks standards compliance was greater when competitive foods were overseen by food service departments, in comparison with others (e.g., principals, student organizations, or outside vendors [77% vs. 59% compliance; = 0.003]). Therefore, district wellness policies should consider requiring food service departments to oversee competitive foods. Federal and state policies should limit added sugars, artificial sweeteners, and synthetic dyes. This appears to be highly feasible, given the substantial number of products that meet these criteria. UFSM policies should also be considered to support healthier school meal environments more broadly.
美国学校(“竞争食品”)除正餐外通常还出售零食和饮料,但这些食品的当前营养质量和是否符合国家“明智之选”(Smart Snacks)标准尚不清楚。本研究评估了全国 90 所中学样本中的竞争食品。采用混合方法方差分析来衡量学校特征差异与合规性的关系。总体而言,样本中 80%的学校出售竞争食品;但在普遍提供免费校餐(universal free school meal,UFSM)政策的学校中,这类食品的供应较少。共记录了 840 种独特产品,平均有 75%符合“明智之选”标准。共有 56%的产品符合推荐的添加糖限量(<10%的卡路里);340 种独特产品(40%)既符合添加糖标准,又符合“明智之选”标准。约五分之一的竞争食品含有合成染料,31%的饮料含有人工甜味剂。与其他部门(例如校长、学生组织或外部供应商)相比,由餐饮部门监管的竞争食品符合“明智之选”标准的比例更高(分别为 77%和 59%; = 0.003)。因此,地区健康政策应考虑要求餐饮部门监管竞争食品。联邦和州政策应限制添加糖、人工甜味剂和合成染料。鉴于符合这些标准的产品数量众多,这似乎是非常可行的。此外,还应考虑普遍提供免费校餐政策,以更广泛地支持更健康的学校用餐环境。