Rosenfeld Lindsay E, Cohen Juliana Fw, Gorski Mary T, Lessing Andrés J, Smith Lauren, Rimm Eric B, Hoffman Jessica A
1Institute for Child,Youth,and Family Policy,The Heller School for Social Policy and Management,Brandeis University,415 South Street,MS 035,Waltham,MA 02454,USA.
2Department of Nutrition,Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health,Boston,MA,USA.
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Feb;20(3):556-564. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016002044. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
In autumn 2012, Massachusetts schools implemented comprehensive competitive food and beverage standards similar to the US Department of Agriculture's Smart Snacks in School standards. We explored major themes raised by food-service directors (FSD) regarding their school-district-wide implementation of the standards.
For this qualitative study, part of a larger mixed-methods study, compliance was measured via direct observation of foods and beverages during school site visits in spring 2013 and 2014, calculated to ascertain the percentage of compliant products available to students. Semi-structured interviews with school FSD conducted in each year were analysed for major implementation themes; those raised by more than two-thirds of participating school districts were explored in relationship to compliance.
Massachusetts school districts (2013: n 26; 2014: n 21).
Data collected from FSD.
Seven major themes were raised by more than two-thirds of participating school districts (range 69-100 %): taking measures for successful transition; communicating with vendors/manufacturers; using tools to identify compliant foods and beverages; receiving support from leadership; grappling with issues not covered by the law; anticipating changes in sales of competitive foods and beverages; and anticipating changes in sales of school meals. Each theme was mentioned by the majority of more-compliant school districts (65-81 %), with themes being raised more frequently after the second year of implementation (range increase 4-14 %).
FSD in more-compliant districts were more likely to talk about themes than those in less-compliant districts. Identified themes suggest best-practice recommendations likely useful for school districts implementing the final Smart Snacks in School standards, effective July 2016.
2012年秋季,马萨诸塞州的学校实施了与美国农业部的《学校智能零食》标准类似的全面竞争性食品和饮料标准。我们探讨了食品服务主管(FSD)提出的关于在其学区范围内实施这些标准的主要主题。
在这项定性研究中,作为一项更大的混合方法研究的一部分,通过在2013年春季和2014年学校实地考察期间直接观察食品和饮料来衡量合规情况,计算出可供学生选择的合规产品的百分比。对每年与学校食品服务主管进行的半结构化访谈进行分析,以找出主要的实施主题;对超过三分之二参与学区提出的主题与合规情况进行关联探讨。
马萨诸塞州学区(2013年:n = 26;2014年:n = 21)。
从食品服务主管处收集的数据。
超过三分之二的参与学区(范围为69 - 100%)提出了七个主要主题:采取措施实现成功过渡;与供应商/制造商沟通;使用工具识别合规的食品和饮料;获得领导层的支持;应对法律未涵盖的问题;预测竞争性食品和饮料销售的变化;以及预测学校餐食销售的变化。大多数合规程度较高的学区(65 - 81%)提到了每个主题,并且在实施的第二年之后这些主题被提及的频率更高(范围增加4 - 14%)。
合规程度较高的学区的食品服务主管比合规程度较低的学区的主管更有可能谈论这些主题。确定的主题提出了可能对实施2016年7月生效的最终《学校智能零食》标准的学区有用的最佳实践建议。