J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Dec;118(12):2296-2301. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.07.009. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
In 2012, Massachusetts implemented both the updated national school meal standards and comprehensive competitive food/beverage standards that closely align with current national requirements for school snacks.
This study examines the impact of these combined standards on school meal and snack food selections, as well as food choices outside of school. In addition, this study examines the impact of these standards on nutrients consumed.
The NOURISH (Nutrition Opportunities to Understand Reforms Involving Student Health) Study was an observational cohort study conducted among students from spring 2012 to spring 2013.
PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: One hundred sixty students in 12 middle schools and high schools in Massachusetts completed two 24-hour recalls before (spring 2012) and after implementation (spring 2013) of the updated standards.
Changes in school meals, competitive food, and after-school snack selection, as well as nutrients consumed outside of school were examined.
Logistic regression and mixed-model analysis of variance were used to examine food selection and consumption.
After implementation, 13.6% more students chose a school meal (70.1% vs 56.5%; P=0.02). There were no differences in competitive food purchases but a significant decrease in the number of after-school unhealthy snacks consumed (0.69 [standard error=0.08] vs 1.02 [standard error=0.10]; P=0.009). During the entire day, students consumed, on average, 22 fewer grams of sugar daily after implementation compared with before implementation (86 g vs 108 g; P=0.002).
With the reduction in the number of unhealthy school snacks, significantly more students selected school meals. Students did not compensate for lack of unhealthy snacks in school by increased consumption of unhealthy snacks outside of school. This provides important new evidence that both national school meal and snack policies may improve daily diet quality and should remain strong.
2012 年,马萨诸塞州实施了更新的国家学校膳食标准和全面的竞争食品/饮料标准,这些标准与当前国家对学校零食的要求紧密一致。
本研究旨在考察这些综合标准对学校膳食和零食选择的影响,以及校外食品选择的影响。此外,本研究还考察了这些标准对所摄入营养素的影响。
NOURISH(营养机会理解改革对学生健康的影响)研究是一项观察性队列研究,于 2012 年春季至 2013 年春季在马萨诸塞州的 12 所中学和高中的 160 名学生中进行。
参与者/设置:在更新标准实施前后(2012 年春季和 2013 年春季),12 所中学和高中的 160 名学生完成了两次 24 小时回顾调查。
考察学校膳食、竞争食品和课后零食选择的变化,以及校外所摄入营养素的变化。
使用逻辑回归和混合模型方差分析来考察食物选择和消费情况。
实施后,选择学校膳食的学生比例增加了 13.6%(70.1%比 56.5%;P=0.02)。购买竞争食品的情况没有差异,但课后不健康零食的消费量显著减少(0.69[标准误=0.08]比 1.02[标准误=0.10];P=0.009)。在一整天中,与实施前相比,实施后学生平均每天摄入的糖减少了 22 克(86 克比 108 克;P=0.002)。
随着不健康学校零食数量的减少,选择学校膳食的学生比例显著增加。学生并没有通过在校外增加食用不健康零食来弥补学校内缺乏不健康零食的情况。这提供了重要的新证据,表明国家学校膳食和零食政策可能会改善日常饮食质量,因此应该保持这些政策的强大。