Department of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Oct;25(4):2797-2813. doi: 10.1177/15248380241226627. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
The term institutional betrayal (Smith and Freyd, 2014) builds on the conceptual framework of betrayal trauma theory (see Freyd, 1996) to describe the ways that institutions (e.g., universities, workplaces) fail to take appropriate steps to prevent and/or respond appropriately to interpersonal trauma. A nascent literature has begun to describe individual costs associated with institutional betrayal throughout the United States (U.S.), with implications for public policy and institutional practice. A scoping review was conducted to quantify existing study characteristics and key findings to guide research and practice going forward. Multiple academic databases were searched for keywords (i.e., "institutional betrayal" and "organizational betrayal"). Thirty-seven articles met inclusion criteria (i.e., peer-reviewed empirical studies of institutional betrayal) and were included in analyses. Results identified research approaches, populations and settings, and predictor and outcome variables frequently studied in relation to institutional betrayal. This scoping review describes a strong foundation of published studies and provides recommendations for future research, including longitudinal research with diverse individuals across diverse institutional settings. The growing evidence for action has broad implications for research-informed policy and institutional practice.
术语“机构背叛”(Smith 和 Freyd,2014)建立在背叛创伤理论的概念框架之上(参见 Freyd,1996),用于描述机构(例如大学、工作场所)未能采取适当措施预防和/或对人际创伤做出适当反应的方式。在美国,已经开始有初步文献描述与机构背叛相关的个人成本,这对公共政策和机构实践具有影响。进行了范围审查,以量化现有研究特征和主要发现,为未来的研究和实践提供指导。多个学术数据库都搜索了关键词(即“机构背叛”和“组织背叛”)。符合纳入标准(即关于机构背叛的同行评审实证研究)的 37 篇文章被纳入分析。结果确定了与机构背叛相关的研究方法、人群和环境,以及预测和结果变量。本范围审查描述了已发表研究的坚实基础,并为未来的研究提供了建议,包括在不同机构环境中对不同人群进行的纵向研究。针对行动的日益增多的证据对研究驱动的政策和机构实践具有广泛影响。