Allen Matthew B, Reich Amanda J, Collins Patrick, Chahal Karen, Moustaqim-Barrette Maria, Bernacki Rachelle E, Cooper Zara, Bader Angela M
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Ann Surg. 2025 Mar 1;281(3):438-444. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006214. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
To characterize the perceptions of surgeons, anesthesiologists, and geriatricians regarding perioperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in surgical patients with frailty.
The population of patients undergoing surgery is growing older and more frail. Despite a growing focus on goal-concordant care, frailty assessment, and debate regarding the appropriateness of CPR in patients with frailty, providers' views regarding frailty and perioperative CPR are unknown.
We performed qualitative thematic analysis of transcripts from semistructured interviews of anesthesiologists (8), surgeons (10), and geriatricians (9) who care for high-risk surgical patients at 2 academic medical centers in Boston, MA. The interview guide elicited clinicians' understanding of frailty, approach to decision-making regarding perioperative CPR, and perceptions of perioperative CPR in frail surgical patients.
We identified 5 themes: (1) perceptions of perioperative CPR in patients with frailty vary by provider specialty, (2) judgments regarding the appropriateness of CPR in surgical patients with frailty are typically multifactorial and include patient goals, age, comorbidities, and arrest etiology, (3) resuscitation in patients with frailty is sometimes associated with moral distress, (4) biases, such as ableism and ageism, may skew clinicians' perceptions of the appropriateness of perioperative CPR in patients with frailty, and (5) evidence to guide risk stratification for patients with frailty undergoing perioperative CPR is inadequate.
Anesthesiologists, surgeons, and geriatricians offer different accounts of frailty's relevance to judgments regarding CPR in surgical patients. Divergent views regarding frailty and perioperative CPR may impede efforts to deliver goal-concordant care and suggest a need for research to inform risk stratification, predict patient-centered outcomes, and understand the role of potential biases, such as ageism and ableism.
描述外科医生、麻醉医生和老年病医生对体弱外科患者围手术期心肺复苏(CPR)的看法。
接受手术的患者群体年龄越来越大且身体越来越虚弱。尽管越来越关注目标一致的护理、体弱评估以及关于体弱患者进行心肺复苏的适宜性的争论,但医疗服务提供者对体弱和围手术期心肺复苏的看法尚不清楚。
我们对在马萨诸塞州波士顿的2个学术医疗中心照顾高危外科患者的麻醉医生(8名)、外科医生(10名)和老年病医生(9名)进行半结构化访谈的文字记录进行了定性主题分析。访谈指南引出了临床医生对体弱的理解、围手术期心肺复苏决策方法以及对体弱外科患者围手术期心肺复苏的看法。
我们确定了5个主题:(1)体弱患者围手术期心肺复苏的看法因医疗服务提供者的专业而异;(2)对体弱外科患者进行心肺复苏适宜性的判断通常是多因素的,包括患者目标、年龄、合并症和心脏骤停病因;(3)体弱患者的复苏有时与道德困扰有关;(4)诸如能力主义和年龄歧视等偏见可能会扭曲临床医生对体弱患者围手术期心肺复苏适宜性的看法;(5)指导接受围手术期心肺复苏的体弱患者进行风险分层的证据不足。
麻醉医生、外科医生和老年病医生对体弱与外科患者心肺复苏判断的相关性给出了不同的描述。关于体弱和围手术期心肺复苏的不同观点可能会阻碍提供目标一致护理的努力,并表明需要进行研究以指导风险分层、预测以患者为中心的结果以及理解年龄歧视和能力主义等潜在偏见的作用。