Bi Jiarui, Khoshkam Vahid, Hunter Mylea, Cho Christopher, Kar Kian
Department of Endodontics and Periodontics; Center for Craniofacial Molecular Biology, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Center for Craniofacial Molecular Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Oral Implantol. 2023 Dec 1;49(6):616-628. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-23-00114.
Peri-implant diseases have become one of the notable biological complications of postrehabilitation with implant-supported restorations. Effective modalities for decontamination of biofilm deposits around implant surfaces are critical for resolution of the inflammation. Air polishing is one of the recommended clinical methods for treating peri-implant diseases. This systematic review assessed clinical evidence on efficacy of using air polishing technology for the management of peri-implant diseases, including peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Four electronic databases from January 1990 to December 2022 were searched to identify the relative human randomized clinical trials that applied air polishing for nonsurgical and surgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Twelve articles were selected. For treating peri-implant mucositis, air polishing showed a comparable effect to ultrasonic scaling in the reduction of bleeding on probing (BOP) and probing pocket depth (PPD). The nonsurgical approach of air polishing in treating peri-implantitis varied in the reduction of BOP, PPD, and clinical attachment level (CAL) in evaluated studies. Air polishing in the surgical treatment of peri-implantitis was comparable to mechanical cleaning, implantoplasty, and the use of Ti-brush, in regards to the significant reduction of BOP, PPD, and CAL, as well as the improvement of the bone level between baseline and follow-ups. The standardized mean difference with a 95% confidence interval of the studied parameters was estimated using the random effect model; however, statistical differences were not detected between air polishing and comparative modalities in the treatment of peri-implantitis. Within the limitations of this review, the application of air polishing did not result in more favorable outcomes in the treatment of peri-implant diseases compared to other modalities.
种植体周围疾病已成为种植体支持修复体修复后显著的生物学并发症之一。有效清除种植体表面生物膜沉积物的方法对于炎症的消退至关重要。空气抛光是治疗种植体周围疾病推荐的临床方法之一。本系统评价评估了使用空气抛光技术管理种植体周围疾病(包括种植体周围黏膜炎和种植体周围炎)疗效的临床证据。检索了1990年1月至2022年12月的四个电子数据库,以确定应用空气抛光对种植体周围黏膜炎和种植体周围炎进行非手术和手术治疗的相关人类随机临床试验。共筛选出12篇文章。在治疗种植体周围黏膜炎方面,空气抛光在减少探诊出血(BOP)和探诊袋深度(PPD)方面显示出与超声洁治相当的效果。在评估研究中,空气抛光治疗种植体周围炎的非手术方法在减少BOP、PPD和临床附着水平(CAL)方面存在差异。在种植体周围炎的手术治疗中,空气抛光在显著减少BOP、PPD和CAL以及改善基线与随访之间的骨水平方面与机械清洁、种植体成形术和使用钛刷相当。使用随机效应模型估计了研究参数的标准化平均差及其95%置信区间;然而,在种植体周围炎的治疗中,未检测到空气抛光与对照方法之间的统计学差异。在本评价的局限性范围内,与其他方法相比,空气抛光在治疗种植体周围疾病方面并未产生更有利的结果。