Kumari Ritu, Saurabh Kumar, Kumar Santosh, Kumari Namrata
Microbiology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND.
Emergency Medicine, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND.
Cureus. 2023 Dec 21;15(12):e50894. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50894. eCollection 2023 Dec.
Background The rise of antibiotic resistance, particularly in Gram-negative bacteria, poses a significant global health threat. Colistin, a last-resort antibiotic, has witnessed renewed use. However, accurate susceptibility testing for colistin is challenging, with various methods available, leading to potential discrepancies. Ensuring reliable testing is crucial for effective patient treatment and antimicrobial stewardship. This study addresses the need to compare different colistin susceptibility testing methods, providing insights into their accuracy and relevance in clinical settings. Methods In this one-year prospective observational cross-sectional study conducted at Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (IGIMS), Bihar, India, a tertiary care hospital from July 2021 to June 2022, we aimed to evaluate the concordance between two widely used methods, VITEK 2 and Disc Diffusion, for antibiotic susceptibility testing in clinical multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial isolates. These isolates, including species like , , , , , and , were isolated from various clinical specimens. After rigorous species-level identification and quality control measures, antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using both methods, and their agreement was assessed through Percentage Agreement analysis. Results In our study, we isolated and identified bacterial isolates from 105 patients, with a mean age of 47.30 years, demonstrating a wide age range. Pus samples were the most common type (25.7%), and was the most prevalent organism (45.7%). Antibiotic resistance patterns revealed significant challenges in treating infections caused by and , with resistance rates exceeding 70% for certain antibiotics. Among the 48 isolates of , the agreement was 93.8%, with 89.6% being sensitive and 6.3% being resistant by Disc Diffusion, while VITEK 2 indicated 0% resistance. isolates (n=21) had an agreement of 90.5%, with 90.5% sensitivity and 9.5% resistance by Disc Diffusion, and no resistance by VITEK 2. Conclusion The comparative analysis of antibiotic susceptibility testing methods reveals the superior performance of the VITEK 2 system, particularly in sensitivity and negative predictive value, emphasizing its potential as a reliable tool for guiding antibiotic therapy decisions.
背景 抗生素耐药性的上升,尤其是革兰氏阴性菌的耐药性,对全球健康构成了重大威胁。黏菌素作为一种最后手段的抗生素,已重新开始使用。然而,对黏菌素进行准确的药敏试验具有挑战性,现有多种方法,这可能导致潜在差异。确保可靠的检测对于有效的患者治疗和抗菌药物管理至关重要。本研究旨在比较不同的黏菌素药敏试验方法,深入了解其在临床环境中的准确性和相关性。方法 在印度比哈尔邦的三级护理医院英迪拉·甘地医学科学研究所(IGIMS)于2021年7月至2022年6月进行的这项为期一年的前瞻性观察性横断面研究中,我们旨在评估两种广泛使用的方法,即VITEK 2和纸片扩散法,在临床多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌分离株抗生素药敏试验中的一致性。这些分离株包括 、 、 、 、 、 等菌种,从各种临床标本中分离得到。经过严格的菌种鉴定和质量控制措施后,使用这两种方法进行抗生素药敏试验,并通过百分比一致性分析评估它们的一致性。结果 在我们的研究中,我们从105名患者中分离并鉴定出细菌分离株,平均年龄为47.30岁,年龄范围广泛。脓液样本是最常见的类型(25.7%), 是最常见的菌种(45.7%)。抗生素耐药模式显示,治疗由 和 引起的感染面临重大挑战,某些抗生素的耐药率超过70%。在48株 分离株中,一致性为93.8%,纸片扩散法显示89.6%敏感,6.3%耐药,而VITEK 2显示0%耐药。 分离株(n = 21)的一致性为90.5%,纸片扩散法显示90.5%敏感,9.5%耐药,VITEK 2显示无耐药。结论 抗生素药敏试验方法的比较分析显示,VITEK 2系统具有更优的性能,尤其是在敏感性和阴性预测值方面,强调了其作为指导抗生素治疗决策的可靠工具的潜力。