Periyasamy Sathish, Youssef Pierre, John Sujit, Thara Rangaswamy, Mowry Bryan J
Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, The Park Centre for Mental Health, Wacol, QLD, Australia.
Front Genet. 2024 Jan 8;14:1301150. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1301150. eCollection 2023.
The relationship between genotype and phenotype is governed by numerous genetic interactions (GIs), and the mapping of GI networks is of interest for two main reasons: 1) By modelling biological robustness, GIs provide a powerful opportunity to infer compensatory biological mechanisms via the identification of functional relationships between genes, which is of interest for biological discovery and translational research. Biological systems have evolved to compensate for genetic (i.e., variations and mutations) and environmental (i.e., drug efficacy) perturbations by exploiting compensatory relationships between genes, pathways and biological processes; 2) GI facilitates the identification of the direction (alleviating or aggravating interactions) and magnitude of epistatic interactions that influence the phenotypic outcome. The generation of GIs for human diseases is impossible using experimental biology approaches such as systematic deletion analysis. Moreover, the generation of disease-specific GIs has never been undertaken in humans. We used our Indian schizophrenia case-control (case-816, controls-900) genetic dataset to implement the workflow. Standard GWAS sample quality control procedure was followed. We used the imputed genetic data to increase the SNP coverage to analyse epistatic interactions across the genome comprehensively. Using the odds ratio (OR), we identified the GIs that increase or decrease the risk of a disease phenotype. The SNP-based epistatic results were transformed into gene-based epistatic results. We have developed a novel approach by conducting gene-based statistical epistatic analysis using an Indian schizophrenia case-control genetic dataset and transforming these results to infer GIs that increase the risk of schizophrenia. There were ∼9.5 million GIs with a -value 1 10. Approximately 4.8 million GIs showed an increased risk (OR > 1.0), while ∼4.75 million GIs had a decreased risk (OR <1.0) for schizophrenia. Unlike model organisms, this approach is specifically viable in humans due to the availability of abundant disease-specific genome-wide genotype datasets. The study exclusively identified brain/nervous system-related processes, affirming the findings. This computational approach fills a critical gap by generating practically non-existent heritable disease-specific human GIs from human genetic data. These novel datasets can train innovative deep-learning models, potentially surpassing the limitations of conventional GWAS.
基因型与表型之间的关系由众多基因相互作用(GI)所支配,而GI网络的图谱绘制因两个主要原因而备受关注:1)通过对生物稳健性进行建模,GI通过识别基因之间的功能关系,为推断补偿性生物学机制提供了强大契机,这对于生物学发现和转化研究具有重要意义。生物系统已经进化到通过利用基因、通路和生物过程之间的补偿关系来补偿遗传(即变异和突变)和环境(即药物疗效)扰动;2)GI有助于识别影响表型结果的上位性相互作用的方向(减轻或加重相互作用)和强度。使用诸如系统缺失分析等实验生物学方法,不可能生成人类疾病的GI。此外,从未在人类中进行过疾病特异性GI的生成。我们使用我们的印度精神分裂症病例对照(病例816例,对照900例)遗传数据集来实施该工作流程。遵循了标准的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)样本质量控制程序。我们使用推算的遗传数据来增加单核苷酸多态性(SNP)覆盖范围,以全面分析全基因组的上位性相互作用。使用优势比(OR),我们确定了增加或降低疾病表型风险的GI。基于SNP的上位性结果被转化为基于基因的上位性结果。我们通过使用印度精神分裂症病例对照遗传数据集进行基于基因的统计上位性分析,并将这些结果转化以推断增加精神分裂症风险的GI,开发了一种新方法。有大约950万个GI的p值小于1×10⁻⁵。大约480万个GI显示精神分裂症风险增加(OR>1.0),而大约475万个GI精神分裂症风险降低(OR<1.0)。与模式生物不同,由于有丰富的疾病特异性全基因组基因型数据集,这种方法在人类中特别可行。该研究专门确定了与脑/神经系统相关的过程,证实了这些发现。这种计算方法通过从人类遗传数据中生成实际上不存在的遗传性疾病特异性人类GI,填补了一个关键空白。这些新数据集可以训练创新的深度学习模型,可能超越传统GWAS的局限性。