Scholle Oliver, Rasmussen Lotte, Reilev Mette, Viebrock Jost, Haug Ulrike
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstrasse 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Infect Dis Ther. 2024 Feb;13(2):299-312. doi: 10.1007/s40121-024-00916-3. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
Comparing antibiotic prescribing between countries can provide important insights into potential needs of improving antibiotic stewardship programs. We aimed to compare outpatient antibiotic prescribing in early life between children born in Denmark and Germany.
Using the Danish nationwide healthcare registries and a German claims database (GePaRD, ~ 20% population coverage), we included children born between 2004 and 2016, and followed them regarding outpatient antibiotic prescriptions until end of enrollment or the end of 2018. We then determined the median time to first antibiotic prescription. Based on all prescriptions in the first 2 years of life, we calculated the rate of antibiotic treatment episodes and for the children's first prescriptions in this period, we determined established quality indicators. All analyses were stratified by birth year and country.
In the 2016 birth cohorts, the median time to first antibiotic prescription was ~ 21 months in Denmark and ~ 28 in Germany; the rate of antibiotic treatment episodes per 1000 person-years was 537 in Denmark and 433 in Germany; the percentage of prescribed antibiotics with higher concerns regarding side effects and/or resistance potential was 6.2% in Denmark and 44.2% in Germany. In the 2016 birth cohorts, the age at first antibiotic prescription was 50-59% higher compared to the 2004 birth cohorts; the rate of antibiotic treatment episodes was 43-44% lower.
Infants in Denmark received antibiotics markedly earlier and more frequently than in Germany, while quality indicators of antibiotic prescribing were more favorable in Denmark. Although both countries experienced positive changes towards more rational antibiotic prescribing in early life, our findings suggest potential for further improvement. This particularly applies to prescribing antibiotics with a lower potential for side effects and/or resistance in Germany.
比较不同国家的抗生素处方情况可以为改善抗生素管理计划的潜在需求提供重要见解。我们旨在比较丹麦和德国出生儿童在生命早期的门诊抗生素处方情况。
利用丹麦全国医疗保健登记系统和德国一个索赔数据库(GePaRD,覆盖约20%的人口),我们纳入了2004年至2016年出生的儿童,并跟踪他们的门诊抗生素处方情况,直至登记结束或2018年底。然后我们确定首次抗生素处方的中位时间。根据生命最初两年的所有处方,我们计算抗生素治疗发作率,对于这一时期儿童的首次处方,我们确定既定的质量指标。所有分析按出生年份和国家进行分层。
在2016年出生队列中,丹麦首次抗生素处方的中位时间约为21个月,德国约为28个月;每1000人年的抗生素治疗发作率丹麦为537,德国为433;副作用和/或耐药潜力方面关注度较高的抗生素处方比例丹麦为6.2%,德国为44.2%。在2016年出生队列中,与2004年出生队列相比,首次抗生素处方的年龄高50 - 59%;抗生素治疗发作率低43 - 44%。
丹麦婴儿接受抗生素治疗的时间明显早于德国且频率更高,而丹麦抗生素处方的质量指标更优。尽管两国在生命早期抗生素处方更趋合理方面都有积极变化,但我们的研究结果表明仍有进一步改善的潜力。这尤其适用于德国降低副作用和/或耐药潜力较低的抗生素的处方情况。