Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, NY, United States of America.
Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, NY, United States of America; New York University Wagner School of Public Policy, New York, NY, United States of America.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024 Mar 1;256:111088. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.111088. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
The increasing relevance of substance use disorder (SUD) within the Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AA&NH/PI) communities, particularly amidst rising anti-Asian hate incidents and the disproportionate health and economic challenges faced by the NH/PI community during the COVID-19 pandemic, underscores the urgency of understanding substance use patterns, treatment disparities, and outcomes.
Following PRISMA guidelines, 37 out of 231 studies met the search criteria. Study characteristics, study datasets, substance use rates, SUD rates, treatment disparities, treatment quality, completion rates, and analyses disaggregated by the most specific AA&NH/PI ethnic group reported were examined.
Despite increased treatment admissions over the past two decades, AA&NH/PI remain underrepresented in treatment facilities and underutilize SUD care services. Treatment quality and completion rates are also lower among AA&NH/PI. Analyses that did not disaggregate AA and NHPI as distinct groups from each other or that presented aggregate data only within AA or NHPI as a whole were common, but available disaggregated analyses reveal variations in substance use and treatment disparities among ethnic groups. There is also a lack of research in exploring within-group disparities, including specific case of older adults and substance use.
To address disparities in access to substance use treatment and improve outcomes for AA&NH/PI populations, targeted interventions and strategic data collection methods that capture diverse ethnic groups and languages are crucial. Acknowledging data bias and expanding data collection to encompass multiple languages are essential for fostering a more inclusive approach to addressing SUD among AA&NH/PI populations.
物质使用障碍(SUD)在亚裔美国人、夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民(AA&NH/PI)社区中的相关性不断增加,尤其是在反亚裔仇恨事件不断增加和 NH/PI 社区在 COVID-19 大流行期间面临不成比例的健康和经济挑战的情况下,这突显了了解物质使用模式、治疗差异和结果的紧迫性。
根据 PRISMA 指南,从 231 项研究中筛选出 37 项符合搜索标准的研究。检查了研究特征、研究数据集、物质使用率、SUD 率、治疗差异、治疗质量、完成率以及按报告的最具体的 AA&NH/PI 族裔群体进行的分析。
尽管在过去二十年中治疗入院率有所增加,但 AA&NH/PI 在治疗设施中的代表性仍然不足,并且对 SUD 护理服务的利用率较低。AA&NH/PI 的治疗质量和完成率也较低。没有将 AA 和 NHPI 彼此区分开来进行分析,或者仅在 AA 或 NHPI 整体范围内呈现综合数据的分析很常见,但可用的细分分析揭示了不同族裔群体之间物质使用和治疗差异的变化。此外,还缺乏研究来探索群体内的差异,包括老年人和物质使用的具体情况。
为了解决物质使用治疗机会的差异并改善 AA&NH/PI 人群的治疗结果,需要采取针对不同族裔群体和语言的干预措施和战略数据收集方法。承认数据偏差并扩大数据收集范围以涵盖多种语言对于促进解决 AA&NH/PI 人群中 SUD 的更具包容性方法至关重要。