Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jan 23;25(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07183-w.
The Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (DASH) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for many upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. In patients with severe traumatic conditions, limited evidence exists regarding the equivalence between DASH and its shortened version, QuickDASH, which is more feasible in clinical practice. The rationale of this study was to analyze the concurrent validity of QuickDASH with respect to DASH in patients with traumatic upper extremity amputation.
This study is based on a consecutive cohort of traumatic upper extremity amputation patients treated with replantation or revision (completion) amputation at Tampere University Hospital between 2009 and 2019. We estimated the concurrent validity of QuickDASH with respect to DASH by correlation coefficients, mean score differences, Bland-Altman plots, and distribution density. Additionally, we assessed internal reliability with Cronbach's alpha coefficients and item-total correlations.
We found a very strong linear correlation between DASH and QuickDASH scores (r = 0.97 [CI 95% 0.97-0.98], p < 0.001). The mean difference between DASH and QuickDASH was minor (MD = -1, SD 4 [CI95% from -1 to 0] p = 0.02). The mean sub-score for the activity domain was higher for QuickDASH than DASH (MD = -3 [CI95% from -4 to -3] p < 0.000) and lower for the symptom domain (MD = 7 [CI95% from 6 to 9] p < 0.000). The Bland and Altman plot showed good agreement between DASH and QuickDASH scores, but there was measurement error in QuickDASH with high scores (r = -0.20, [CI95% from -0.31 to -0.09], p = 0.001).
QuickDASH demonstrates higher total scores than the full DASH and emphasizes rating of activity over symptoms. Still, on average the differences in total scores are likely less than the MCID of DASH, and consequently, this study shows that QuickDASH can be recommended instead of the full DASH when assessing a traumatic condition.
Retrospectively registered.
手臂、肩部和手部残疾量表(DASH)是一种经过验证的患者报告结局测量(PROM),适用于许多上肢肌肉骨骼疾病。在患有严重创伤性疾病的患者中,关于 DASH 与其简化版 QuickDASH 之间的等效性的证据有限,而 QuickDASH 在临床实践中更为可行。本研究的原理是分析 QuickDASH 与创伤性上肢截肢患者的 DASH 之间的同时效度。
本研究基于 2009 年至 2019 年在坦佩雷大学医院接受再植或revision(完成)截肢治疗的创伤性上肢截肢患者的连续队列。我们通过相关系数、平均得分差异、Bland-Altman 图和分布密度来估计 QuickDASH 相对于 DASH 的同时效度。此外,我们还使用 Cronbach's alpha 系数和项目总分相关性评估了内部可靠性。
我们发现 DASH 和 QuickDASH 评分之间存在很强的线性相关性(r=0.97 [CI 95% 0.97-0.98],p<0.001)。DASH 和 QuickDASH 之间的平均差异较小(MD=-1,SD 4 [CI95% 从-1 到 0],p=0.02)。活动域的平均亚评分QuickDASH 高于 DASH(MD=-3 [CI95% 从-4 到-3],p<0.000),症状域的平均亚评分 QuickDASH 低于 DASH(MD=7 [CI95% 从 6 到 9],p<0.000)。Bland 和 Altman 图显示 DASH 和 QuickDASH 评分之间具有良好的一致性,但在高得分时 QuickDASH 存在测量误差(r=-0.20,[CI95% 从-0.31 到-0.09],p=0.001)。
QuickDASH 的总评分高于完整的 DASH,并强调对活动的评分而不是对症状的评分。尽管如此,平均而言,总分的差异可能小于 DASH 的 MCID,因此,本研究表明,在评估创伤性疾病时,可以推荐使用 QuickDASH 代替完整的 DASH。
回顾性注册。