• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

光固化正畸粘接剂临床性能评价——一项研究。

Clinical performance of light-cured orthodontic adhesives for bonding brackets - an study.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.

Department of Public Health Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2023 Nov 7;12:1442. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.141328.1. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.12688/f1000research.141328.1
PMID:38264264
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10804051/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The dental profession is seeing a constant influx of new adhesive systems from manufacturers, each claiming to be more dependable than the last. This study assessed the bond strength and adhesive remnants of different light-cured adhesives used for bonding metal brackets to teeth.

METHODS

80 extracted maxillary premolars with the sound crown structure were acid etched and bonded with brackets on their buccal surfaces utilizing primer and light-cured adhesives into four equal groups, which are Transbond XT, Heliosit, Enlight, and Bracepaste. Shear bond strength (SBS) for de-bonding the brackets were evaluated with Instron- testing machine after 48 hours. The de-bonded samples' adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores were also measured.

RESULTS

The maximum mean SBS was found for Transbond XT (12.91 ± 2.0 MPa), followed by Bracepaste (12.87 ± 1.59 MPa), Enlight (11.77 ± 1.87 MPa), and lowest for Heliosit (10.93 ± 1.71 MPa). According to the four point scale, adhesive remnant index (ARI), Transbond XT has the least adhesive residue left on the tooth, followed by Heliosit. Enlight and Bracepaste have a similar distribution of adhesive, with both having a maximum amount left.

CONCLUSION

It can be inferred that all groups involved demonstrated a satisfactory level of bond strength from a clinical perspective. Transbond XT is the preferred orthodontic adhesive over the other three adhesives due to its superior SBS and ARI properties.

摘要

背景

牙科行业不断有新的制造商推出各种黏接系统,声称其产品比上一代更可靠。本研究评估了用于黏接金属托槽到牙齿的不同光固化黏接剂的黏接强度和黏接残余物。

方法

80 颗上颌前磨牙具有完整的牙冠结构,用酸蚀剂进行酸蚀处理,并在颊面利用底漆和光固化黏接剂黏接托槽,将其分为四组,分别为 Transbond XT、Heliosit、Enlight 和 Bracepaste。48 小时后,使用 In stron 试验机评估用于脱除托槽的剪切黏接强度(SBS)。还测量了脱附样本的黏接残余指数(ARI)评分。

结果

Transbond XT 的最大平均 SBS 最高(12.91 ± 2.0 MPa),其次是 Bracepaste(12.87 ± 1.59 MPa)、Enlight(11.77 ± 1.87 MPa),最低的是 Heliosit(10.93 ± 1.71 MPa)。根据四点量表,黏接残余指数(ARI),Transbond XT 留在牙齿上的黏接残余物最少,其次是 Heliosit。Enlight 和 Bracepaste 具有相似的黏接剂分布,两者都有最大的残留量。

结论

可以推断,从临床角度来看,所有涉及的组都表现出了令人满意的黏接强度水平。Transbond XT 因其具有较高的 SBS 和 ARI 特性,是优于其他三种黏接剂的首选正畸黏接剂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b702/10804051/324d698a10a4/f1000research-12-154763-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b702/10804051/8eae5da77616/f1000research-12-154763-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b702/10804051/554f8a2b2958/f1000research-12-154763-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b702/10804051/e069ace319a4/f1000research-12-154763-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b702/10804051/e262c196b63f/f1000research-12-154763-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b702/10804051/324d698a10a4/f1000research-12-154763-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b702/10804051/8eae5da77616/f1000research-12-154763-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b702/10804051/554f8a2b2958/f1000research-12-154763-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b702/10804051/e069ace319a4/f1000research-12-154763-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b702/10804051/e262c196b63f/f1000research-12-154763-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b702/10804051/324d698a10a4/f1000research-12-154763-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical performance of light-cured orthodontic adhesives for bonding brackets - an study.光固化正畸粘接剂临床性能评价——一项研究。
F1000Res. 2023 Nov 7;12:1442. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.141328.1. eCollection 2023.
2
A Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded With Different Orthodontic Adhesives.不同正畸粘合剂粘结正畸托槽的剪切粘结强度比较
Cureus. 2023 May 16;15(5):e39115. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39115. eCollection 2023 May.
3
Influence of Primer Pre-curing and Co-curing on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Using Three Light-cure Adhesive Systems: An Study.三种光固化粘接系统中预固化和共固化对正畸托槽剪切粘接强度的影响:一项研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022 Sep 1;23(9):900-906. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3409.
4
A comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives.四种不同正畸粘合剂粘结正畸托槽的剪切粘结强度比较。
J Orthod Sci. 2014 Apr;3(2):29-33. doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.132892.
5
An In-Vitro Comparison of Shear Bond Strength and Adhesive Remnant Score Between Two Color Change Adhesives in Orthodontic Bonding With Reduced Curing Time Using Different High-Intensity Light Emitting Diode Units.使用不同高强度发光二极管装置在正畸粘接中缩短固化时间时两种变色粘合剂之间的剪切粘结强度和粘结剂残留分数的体外比较
Cureus. 2023 Jun 25;15(6):e40951. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40951. eCollection 2023 Jun.
6
Comparative evaluation and influence of new Optibond eXTRa self-etch Universal adhesive and conventional Transbond XT on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets-An in vitro study.新型Optibond eXTRa自酸蚀通用粘结剂与传统Transbond XT对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的比较评估及影响——一项体外研究
J Orthod Sci. 2022 Aug 24;11:43. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_22_22. eCollection 2022.
7
Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different self-etching adhesives.使用不同自酸蚀粘接剂粘接的正畸托槽的剪切粘接强度。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Sep;136(3):425-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.024.
8
Shear Bond Strength and Bonding Properties of Orthodontic and nano Adhesives: A Comparative Study.正畸与纳米粘合剂的剪切粘结强度及粘结性能:一项对比研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2019 Oct-Dec;10(4):600-604. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_842_18.
9
Evaluation of the shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index of color change, fluorescent, and conventional orthodontic adhesives: An in vitro study.变色、荧光和传统正畸粘接剂的剪切粘接强度和粘接残留指数评估:一项体外研究。
Int Orthod. 2023 Mar;21(1):100712. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100712. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
10
A Comparative Study of Shear Bond Strength of Direct Bonding System with and without a Liquid Primer: An Study.有液体底涂剂和无液体底涂剂的直接粘结系统剪切粘结强度的比较研究:一项研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019 Nov;11(Suppl 3):S515-S522. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_259_18.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Nanocomposite and Conventional Orthodontic Adhesives: A Prospective Study on Bracket Debonding and Enamel Discoloration.纳米复合正畸粘合剂与传统正畸粘合剂的比较:一项关于托槽脱粘和牙釉质变色的前瞻性研究。
Cureus. 2025 Feb 23;17(2):e79537. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79537. eCollection 2025 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Different Types of Adhesive Agents on Orthodontic Bracket Shear Bond Strength: A Cyclic Loading Study.不同类型黏结剂对正畸托槽剪切黏结强度的影响:一项循环加载研究。
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jan 11;16(2):724. doi: 10.3390/ma16020724.
2
Using UV light for adhesive remnant removal after debonding of orthodontic accessories.正畸附件脱粘后使用紫外线去除粘结剂残余物。
Braz Oral Res. 2018 Sep 21;32:e47. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0047.
3
Adhesives for fixed orthodontic brackets.固定正畸托槽用胶粘剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 9;4(4):CD002282. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002282.pub2.
4
Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type.牙科粘结系统的分类综述:从第四代到通用型
Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017 Jul 3;8(1):1-17. doi: 10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001. eCollection 2017 Jan-Mar.
5
Shear Bond Strength of Three Orthodontic Bonding Systems on Enamel and Restorative Materials.三种正畸粘结系统在牙釉质和修复材料上的剪切粘结强度
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:6307107. doi: 10.1155/2016/6307107. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
6
Comparison of multiple rebond shear strengths of debonded brackets after preparation with sandblasting and CO2 laser.喷砂和二氧化碳激光预处理后脱粘托槽的多次再粘结剪切强度比较
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2016;10(3):148-54. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2016.024. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
7
Shear bond strength of orthodontic color-change adhesives with different light-curing times.不同光固化时间的正畸变色黏合剂的剪切粘结强度
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015 May-Jun;12(3):265-70.
8
The evolution of bonding in orthodontics.正畸学中粘结技术的发展历程。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Apr;147(4 Suppl):S56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.01.011.
9
Comparison of Shear Bond Strength and Estimation of Adhesive Remnant Index between Light-cure Composite and Dual-cure Composite: An in vitro Study.光固化复合树脂与双重固化复合树脂之间的剪切粘结强度比较及粘结剂残留指数评估:一项体外研究
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013 Sep;6(3):166-70. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1212. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
10
Comparative study on direct and indirect bracket bonding techniques regarding time length and bracket detachment.直接和间接托槽粘结技术在时间长度和托槽脱落方面的比较研究
Dental Press J Orthod. 2013 Nov-Dec;18(6):51-7. doi: 10.1590/s2176-94512013000600009.