Wu Huina, Sun Lei, Feng Rui, Zhang Huiyue, Tang Ke, Wang Shuo, Nie Jing
Department of Pharmacy, Shandong Second Provincial General Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China.
College of Pharmacy, Linyi University, Linyi, Shandong, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jan 9;14:1269129. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1269129. eCollection 2023.
Rezvilutamide, a novel androgen-receptor inhibitor with limited blood-brain barrier penetration, exhibits significant antitumour activity against highvolume, metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). In this study, we aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of rezvilutamide and bicalutamide as first-line treatments for untreated prostate cancer among Chinese patients, in order to evaluate the efficacy of rezvilutamide. In this study, we utilized partition survival model to assess the cost-effectiveness of rezvilutamide and bicalutamide treatments for highvolume mHSPC. The model was developed using TreeAge Pro 2022 software and relied on clinical data obtained from the CHART trial. Transition probabilities were estimated from the reported survival probabilities in trials using parametric survival modeling. From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, we calculated quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and lifetime cost. A lifetime horizon and an annual discount rate of 5% were employed. To address modeling uncertainties, we conducted one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. The cost of rezvilutamide bicalutamide were $62700 and $13200. Rezvilutamide had an ICER of $41900 per additional QALYs gained compared with bicalutamide. Research indicated that rezvilutamide achieved at least an 28.20% probability of cost-effectiveness at the threshold of $38223.34/QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that the results were sensitive to utility of PD. Scenario analysis showed that rezvilutamide was cost-effectiveness if its price was reduced by more than 10%. Based on the analysis at the current price, rezvilutamide was found to be less cost-effective for patients with highvolume mHSPC compared to bicalutamide in China.
瑞维鲁胺是一种新型雄激素受体抑制剂,血脑屏障穿透性有限,对高负荷、转移性、激素敏感性前列腺癌(mHSPC)具有显著的抗肿瘤活性。在本研究中,我们旨在比较瑞维鲁胺和比卡鲁胺作为中国患者未经治疗的前列腺癌一线治疗的成本效益,以评估瑞维鲁胺的疗效。在本研究中,我们利用分区生存模型评估瑞维鲁胺和比卡鲁胺治疗高负荷mHSPC的成本效益。该模型使用TreeAge Pro 2022软件开发,并依赖于从CHART试验获得的临床数据。使用参数生存模型从试验中报告的生存概率估计转移概率。从中国医疗保健系统的角度,我们计算了质量调整生命年(QALY)、增量成本效益比(ICER)和终身成本。采用终身视角和5%的年贴现率。为了解决模型的不确定性,我们进行了单向敏感性分析和概率敏感性分析。瑞维鲁胺和比卡鲁胺的成本分别为62700美元和13200美元。与比卡鲁胺相比,瑞维鲁胺每增加一个QALY的ICER为41900美元。研究表明,在38223.34美元/QALY的阈值下,瑞维鲁胺实现成本效益的概率至少为28.20%。单向敏感性分析表明,结果对PD的效用敏感。情景分析表明,如果瑞维鲁胺的价格降低超过10%,则具有成本效益。基于当前价格的分析,在中国,与比卡鲁胺相比,瑞维鲁胺对高负荷mHSPC患者的成本效益较低。