The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, China.
Front Immunol. 2024 Jan 9;14:1332213. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1332213. eCollection 2023.
This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitors or PD-L1 inhibitors [PD-(L)1 inhibitors] for muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (MIBC).
Four databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and 21 CENTRAL) were searched for articles studying neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors for MIBC. The search time period was from the establishment of each database to 21 July 2023. Meta-analyses of pCR, pPR, Grade≥ 3 irAEs rate, RFS, and OS were performed.
In total, 22 studies were included for meta-analysis. The overall pooled pCR of neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors was 0.36 (95%CI=0.30-0.42, p=0.00). In subgroup meta-analysis, the pooled PCR of PD-(L)1 inhibitors alone, PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus other ICI, and PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy was 0.27 (95%CI=0.19-0.35, p=0.1), 0.41 (95%CI=0.21-0.62, p=0.01), 0.43 (95%CI=0.35-0.50, p=0.06), respectively. The overall pooled pPR of neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors was 0.53 (95%CI=0.46-0.60, p=0.00). In subgroup meta-analysis, the pooled pPR of PD-(L)1 inhibitors alone, PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus other ICI, and PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy was 0.36 (95%CI=0.22-0.51, p=0.01), 0.51 (95%CI=0.39-0.62, p=0.43), and 0.61 (95%CI=0.53-0.69, p=0.01), respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves for OS and RFS were reconstructed, but there was no significant difference among three groups in terms of OS or RFS. The pooled result of Grade≥ 3 irAEs rate for neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors was 0.15 (95%CI=0.09-0.22, p=0.00%). In subgroup analysis, the pooled result of Grade≥ 3 irAEs rate for PD-(L)1 inhibitors alone, PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus other ICI, and PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy was 0.07 (95%CI=0.04-0.11, p=0.84), 0.31 (95%CI=0.16-0.47, p=0.06), and 0.17 (95%CI=0.06-0.31, I = 71.27%, p=0.01), respectively.
Neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors were feasible and safe for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Compared with PD-(L)1 inhibitors alone, PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus other ICI and PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy were associated with higher pCR and pPR, but higher Grade≥3 irAEs. Kaplan-Meier curves for OS and RFS indicated that neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors had an acceptable long-term prognostic, but it was not possible to discern statistical differences between the three neoadjuvant subgroups.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023452437, identifier PROSPERO (CRD42023452437).
本荟萃分析旨在评估新辅助 PD-1 抑制剂或 PD-L1 抑制剂(PD-(L)1 抑制剂)治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)的疗效和安全性。
在 Medline、Embase、Web of Science 和 21 个 CENTRAL 数据库中搜索研究新辅助 PD-(L)1 抑制剂治疗 MIBC 的文章。搜索时间为每个数据库建立至 2023 年 7 月 21 日。进行了 pCR、pPR、≥3 级免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)发生率、RFS 和 OS 的荟萃分析。
共纳入 22 项研究进行荟萃分析。新辅助 PD-(L)1 抑制剂的总体完全缓解(pCR)率为 0.36(95%CI=0.30-0.42,p=0.00)。在亚组荟萃分析中,PD-(L)1 抑制剂单独、PD-(L)1 抑制剂联合其他免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)和 PD-(L)1 抑制剂联合化疗的聚合 pCR 率分别为 0.27(95%CI=0.19-0.35,p=0.1)、0.41(95%CI=0.21-0.62,p=0.01)和 0.43(95%CI=0.35-0.50,p=0.06)。新辅助 PD-(L)1 抑制剂的总体部分缓解(pPR)率为 0.53(95%CI=0.46-0.60,p=0.00)。在亚组荟萃分析中,PD-(L)1 抑制剂单独、PD-(L)1 抑制剂联合其他 ICI 和 PD-(L)1 抑制剂联合化疗的聚合 pPR 率分别为 0.36(95%CI=0.22-0.51,p=0.01)、0.51(95%CI=0.39-0.62,p=0.43)和 0.61(95%CI=0.53-0.69,p=0.01)。对 OS 和 RFS 的 Kaplan-Meier 曲线进行了重建,但在 OS 或 RFS 方面,三组之间没有显著差异。新辅助 PD-(L)1 抑制剂治疗的≥3 级 irAEs 发生率的汇总结果为 0.15(95%CI=0.09-0.22,p=0.00)。在亚组分析中,PD-(L)1 抑制剂单独、PD-(L)1 抑制剂联合其他 ICI 和 PD-(L)1 抑制剂联合化疗的≥3 级 irAEs 发生率的汇总结果分别为 0.07(95%CI=0.04-0.11,p=0.84)、0.31(95%CI=0.16-0.47,p=0.06)和 0.17(95%CI=0.06-0.31,I=71.27%,p=0.01)。
新辅助 PD-(L)1 抑制剂治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌是可行且安全的。与 PD-(L)1 抑制剂单独使用相比,PD-(L)1 抑制剂联合其他 ICI 和 PD-(L)1 抑制剂联合化疗与更高的 pCR 和 pPR 相关,但与更高的≥3 级 irAEs 相关。OS 和 RFS 的 Kaplan-Meier 曲线表明,新辅助 PD-(L)1 抑制剂具有可接受的长期预后,但在三个新辅助亚组之间无法辨别出统计学差异。
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023452437,标识符 PROSPERO(CRD42023452437)。