Institute of Immunology, Department of Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Platform for Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Front Immunol. 2024 Jan 9;14:1327776. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1327776. eCollection 2023.
Considering the similarities between swine and humans, it is a logical consequence to use swine as a translational model in research and drug development, including non-clinical safety. Here, we compared the reactivity of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from humans and minipigs under the influence of different compounds . We conducted a flow cytometry-based proliferation assay that focused on the T-cell response to three different stimuli: concanavalin A (ConA), phytohemagglutinin-L (PHA-L), and staphylococcal Enterotoxin B (SEB). Furthermore, four approved immunosuppressive drugs-abatacept, belatacept, rapamycin, and tofacitinib-which are used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis or rejection in transplant recipients, were combined with the different stimuli. This allowed us to study the effect of suppressive drugs in comparison with the different stimuli in both species. We examined proliferating T cells (CD3) and investigated the presence of TCR-αβ and TCR-γδ T cells. Differences in the response of T cells of the two species under these various conditions were evident. CD4 T cells were more activated within humans, whereas CD8 T cells were generally more abundant in swine. The effectiveness of the used humanized antibodies is most likely related to the conserved structure of CTLA-4 as abatacept induced a much stronger reduction in swine compared with belatacept. The reduction of proliferation of rapamycin and tofacitinib was highly dependent on the used stimuli. We further investigated the effect of the immunosuppressive compounds on antigen-specific restimulation of pigs immunized against porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2). Treatment with all four compounds resulted in a clear reduction of the proliferative response, with rapamycin showing the strongest effect. In conclusion, our findings indicate that the effectiveness of suppressive compounds is highly dependent on the stimuli used and must be carefully selected to ensure accurate results. The results highlight the importance of considering the response of T cells in different species when evaluating the potential of an immunomodulatory drug.
考虑到猪和人类之间的相似性,将猪用作研究和药物开发(包括非临床安全性)的翻译模型是合乎逻辑的结果。在这里,我们比较了人类和小型猪的外周血单核细胞(PBMC)在不同化合物影响下的反应性。我们进行了基于流式细胞术的增殖测定,该测定侧重于针对三种不同刺激物的 T 细胞反应:刀豆蛋白 A(ConA)、植物血球凝集素-L(PHA-L)和葡萄球菌肠毒素 B(SEB)。此外,还将四种已批准用于治疗类风湿关节炎或移植受者排斥反应的免疫抑制药物(abatacept、belatacept、rapamycin 和 tofacitinib)与不同的刺激物结合使用。这使我们能够在两种物种中比较抑制药物与不同刺激物的作用。我们检查了增殖的 T 细胞(CD3),并研究了 TCR-αβ和 TCR-γδ T 细胞的存在。两种物种在这些不同条件下 T 细胞反应的差异是明显的。CD4 T 细胞在人类中更活跃,而 CD8 T 细胞在猪中通常更为丰富。所用的人源化抗体的有效性很可能与 CTLA-4 的保守结构有关,因为与 belatacept 相比,abatacept 可使猪的增殖减少得多。rapamycin 和 tofacitinib 的增殖减少高度依赖于所用的刺激物。我们进一步研究了免疫抑制化合物对针对猪圆环病毒 2(PCV2)免疫接种的猪的抗原特异性再刺激的影响。所有四种化合物的治疗均导致增殖反应明显降低,其中 rapamycin 的作用最强。总之,我们的研究结果表明,抑制化合物的有效性高度依赖于所用的刺激物,必须仔细选择以确保获得准确的结果。这些结果强调了在评估免疫调节剂药物的潜力时考虑不同物种 T 细胞反应的重要性。